It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Like so many other pseudoscientific beliefs, RV goes away from proper controls are applied to experiments.
Therefore all science is experimentation
the rest is the history of experiments... much different...
In the case of the tornado viewing only 1/6 might have to do with tornadoes. This is being quite generous. None of the words suggesting location match up with Arkansas.
There is a motion at the target which is; Aggressive and fluid, free in its movement. This builds to a crescendo and then dissipates downwards. The movement feels penetrating as it interacts with the location and structures. The flow/movement is against the structures in a wild, uncontrolled manner. The motion builds to a release then it trails away. As it builds its motion is spikey with aggressive movements then it recedes with a release of energy ‐ much like an orgasm.
That's another huge miss.
There has been a repeated claim that RV is science based. What makes any fo this science based? What are the facts? What are the theories? What experiments are being done to test RV? How is RV falsifiable? What is it that makes any of this science?
So you think that science is just about having a protocol? Not at all. There is no science here as far as I can see. Science is not about following a particular procedure. That's just widow dressing to mkae this appear to be some legitimate line of research. What makes this scientific? The defense seems to be that you distance yourself from some clown with a long list of failures. Brown too has a long list of failures.
All I want to see is some reason that RV is called science based. There are 2 reasons I have been offered in the past: 1. use of a strict protocol 2. multiple levels of blinding Town meetings use a strict protocol. Does that make town meetings science based? Does blinding make the process science-based? No. Blinding is a part of the protocol.
Originally posted by one4all
reply to post by rebellender
In the bible they talk about humans as if they are gods,and angels,but the reality to me is that at some time in the past a meteor hit earth and caused a global flood of biblical proportions,i think this was a direct hit with a weaponised rock,that was directed at us for a specifiec reason,to wipe most of us out.
Doesn't describe a tornado - its just plain ludicrous to say this is a faliure - if you were tasked as part of the english language to describe a tornado without saying the word tornado - then you'd come up with something similar,
How can you claim my data is a miss - you'd have to examine the entire target are and not find a shiny, smooth object? Dont get me wrong Im not claiming this part was a hit - its an unknown - its not a miss.
But OK - clearly you dont like this target, so lets not dwell I have thousands of exmaple done BLIND so how about these:
Again I did in scientific protocol being BLIND to the target amongst others.
Like a location where land and structures meet a vast amount of liquid which is water.
The water feels choppy and deep and part of the structures do feel integrated and under the
water. The overall target feels grey and mild in temperature and grey/overcast.
Which is hard, solid, grey, linear and man made.
This has structures which are also man made and of varying sizes and. shapes – there are
many structures. There is an area which is both land/structures and the water meet.
One of the structures close to the water feels very linear. Flat and stepped.
Which is deep, wide and as far as the eye can see.
The water is cold, blue/grey feels choppy with waves or a wave‐like motion.
The water feels very active – motion wise or rough/choppy.
Road, Lake, sand, sea, Port, Sydney harbour.
do you realise how crazy you come across.
You cant say to a remote viewer - i want you to remote view a target.
The target turns out to be a yellow golf ball.
The remote viewer says:
its a ball, its yellow.
you then say - sorry your not on target because the target could have been a melon ball, or the sun, or a snooker ball???????
you DONT ask yourself - does his data match anything else in the world?????
That makes no sense other than to bolster your plain crazy reasoning.
RV - when done properly IS science based. Some practitioners (admittedly) aren't doing it scientifically.
RV history is ALL science. Remote viewing was created in a science lab, for and by scinetisats.
Its was (when in official use) tested in science labs year on year from 1972 - 1995. Twenty three continuous years.
In these papers - scientist form multiple labs describe RV working under proper scientific controls - under millions of repeated trials.
Whats NOT scientific about it?
When done correctly RV is done within the protocols as created by science - this removes all possibilities of information coming form anything but psychic means.
Well I covered this for you previously .
Yes its partly due to a strict scientifically created protocol
Also the 23 continuous years of study in multiple labs to create this protocols, the massive amount of science papers and in protocol trial which now amount to over 1 million.
The scientist involved, and more.
Originally posted by ripcontrol
The second argument, the accuracy of Remote Viewing...
debates are easy to have and I will finish them later I do look forward to this discussion on it---
Originally posted by ripcontrol
Third the prediction being referenced here
Originally posted by hudsonhawk69
Last time I checked remote viewing and foretelling the future were two very different things.
Originally posted by one4all
reply to post by Malcher
Can you come up with a less labor and resource intensive method to disarm an entire planet that is armed to the teeth with nukes?Then just roll in and pick out all of the billions of tonnes of mined and processed materials you require from whereever they lay.
Better yet enslave those left to collect it for you.It cant be that hard to calculate how big of and what composition of rock would be needed to splash down hard enough to cause a global tidal wave or at least a serious one that kills hundreds of millions of people.
Maybe not an ELE sized rock maybe just one big enough to say inundate the west coast of North America?
I mean who could be blamed for that??Just mother nature herself,and somehow I doubt she will ever issue a denial of guilt.
I mean a country could have sent out probes to enslave a rock and direct it onto say China and obliterate the country with not one shred of evidence of human interaction,40 years ago!!Planning ahead usually pays off.
Not saying this is tru just sayin its a possibility.