It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
reply to post by hawk123
Freemasons:
So the answer is not "divide and average" math of ratios like 9/8 or 5/4 -- the reason is this is from Archytas as my research exposes.
The answer is the complementary opposite resonance of the Perfect Fifth and Perfect Fourth with the Octave.
The theorem attributed to Thales is illustrated by the figure of problem 53 of the Rhind Papyrus, written thirteen hundred years before the birth of Thales...The anecdote claiming that Thales discovered "his" theorem by making the end of the shadow cast by a stick, planted vertically, meet exactly the end of the shadow cast by the Great Pyramid, in order to have a figure materialize identically to that of problem 53, would only prove that Thales actually spent time in Egypt, that he was truly a pupil of Egyptian priests and that he could not be the inventor of the theorem attributed to him.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
reply to post by hawk123
So when iron took over silver in value this meant the containment of infinity through geometric technology and this spread of Egypt when Egypt was invaded by the Hittites around 1200 BCE. But really this "divide and average" process started with the "symbolic revolution" around 9,000 BCE which was before agriculture as monoculture rectilinear development. So there were megalith religious structures built before agriculture and these megaliths had the first anthropocentric art work called the "symbolic revolution" as the attempt to "contain" infinity through geometry.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
reply to post by petrus4
The New Age CIA Freemasonic mind control runs deep.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
So the lunar energy as electrochemical energy is actually Earth energy as the Moon controls the life cycles on Earth
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
The true self is actually a coherent electromagnetic form
can also travel into the future and also can transform into other forms around it
So consciousness is actually this eternal vortex of spacetime
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
The foundation of physics is not based on amplitude which is a classical measurement but instead on frequency as quantum energy.
So energy intensity is measured by quantum frequency
Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by buddhasystem
Care to explain, rather than simply talk trash?
I'd like to hear what you find so offensively inaccurate.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Never do you actually show your intentions so why should I have to answer your questions.
Frequency is a number. It's not "energy".
just one of those New Age constructs
Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by buddhasystem
Frequency is a number. It's not "energy".
Frequency is how we measure energy.
The word "frequency" always acts like a red flag to me, as it is for some reason a word woo-woos like a lot, and throw about in absurd ways despite its having a rigid, and not especially thrilling, definition in the scientific world (three others are "energy," "vibration," and "field"). So I read the article, and found ample fodder for faceplanting right in the first paragraph
Now you're just annoying me.
You don't know anything about New Age whatever, so stop pretending to be better than other users.
the Josephson effect provides an exactly reproducible conversion between frequency and voltage. Since the frequency is already defined precisely and practically by the caesium standard, the Josephson effect is used, for most practical purposes, to give the definition of a volt (although, as of July 2007, this is not the official BIPM definition[9]).
In a unit system adapted to atomic scales, the electronvolt is the appropriate unit of energy and the Petahertz the appropriate unit of frequency.
This kinetic energy (for each photoelectron) is independent of the intensity of the light,[12] but depends linearly on the frequency;[14] and if the frequency is too low (corresponding to a kinetic energy for the photoelectrons of zero or less), no photoelectrons are emitted at all, unless a plurality of photons, whose energetic sum is greater than the energy of the photoelectrons, acts virtually simultaneously (multiphoton effect) [15] Assuming the frequency is high enough to cause the photoelectric effect, a rise in intensity of the light source causes more photoelectrons to be emitted with the same kinetic energy, rather than the same number of photoelectrons to be emitted with higher kinetic energy.[12]
Realization of the volt in the SI system rests on experiments comparing an electrostatic force with a mechanical force, but the uncertainties obtained by this method are much too great to meet the requirements of modern instrumentation. Conversely, the stability of voltage references based on the Josephson effect depends solely on frequency stability, which can easily reach 10-12.
The value for Planck's Constant is 6.6260755 x 10¯34 Joule second. Please note that the unit is Joule MULTIPLIED BY second. It is not a division, both Joule and second are in the numerator. 3) ν is the frequency of the particular photon being studied. The discussion about frequency above applies here. Before going on, I want to discuss one little issue (heh, heh, heh). Frequency is a wave-based idea. What is it doing in a particle-based idea like the quantum? Good question. So much so that the term "wave packet" is often used in discussing these ideas. Indeed, modern science now speaks of "wave-particle duality" rather than "Light is a wave" or "Light is a particle." This whole area is profound and can lead to years of probing discussion. Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr (who were great friends) discussed these issues (and more) often over a period of many years, especially in the late 1920's and early 1930's. Their discussions are still important enough to merit historical study today. Every year, several books are published which delve into one or more of the implications of "wave-particle duality."
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
De Broglie admitted he didn't know what "frequency" meant in quantum physics -- frequency of what?
This is a good discussion of de Broglie and the quantum wavefunction -- what is the wave?
So one person says that considering the graviton -- trying to unit quantum mechanics and relativity -- that indeed it is spacetime that is the wave.
David Bohm considers consciousness to be the wave
So quantum mechanics doesn't agree with itself. Physics is not unified.