reply to post by soficrow
All very pertinent points you have made, thank you for bringing sound logic
to the thread. I appreciate your wits, thanks for sharing them.
To what end these plans may go, its uncertain. Some people in the industry
have stepped forward and have tried to sound an alarm. Perhaps
they have been involved, and at this point are now convinced themselves
that there is a grave danger to the well being of humanity, and they realize
to what poliotical end this may have been used for, and see the cliffs ahead.
One more very illuminating comment was made by Matt Andersson, an aerospace veteran.
He published his comments:
The Economist.
The Co-Option of Global Warming
Comments by Matt Andersson
.www.economist.com...
Ever since the late Edward Teller co-authored the 1997 paper, “Global Warming and Ice Ages: Prospects for Physics-Based Modulation of Global
Change,” the global warming industry has been on a global cooling agenda. Or at least that’s what they think.
Teller advocated for a massive application of metal particulates, among other materials, into the atmosphere to create a reflective “metallic sun
screen” that results in lowered UV radiation and assumed cooling. But this metallic screen was also discovered to possess the inherent capability to
act as a transmission or amplification “web” for various military directed energy weapons and for tactical weather modification, as well as a
potential suspension and delivery medium for bio-warfare purposes, including depopulation. Together, these three agendas have become fused into
a new self-reinforcing “iron triangle.” Every day across the US, Canada and many parts of Europe, high-altitude mission-specific tanker, civil and
other aircraft are spraying hundreds of metric tons of polymerised and ionised sub-micron barium, thorium, uranium and aluminum, among other materials
(including mercury and arsenic), under the ambiguity and abstraction of a benign UN public-private atmospheric and geo-engineering program directed at
countering “global warming.”
Warming and "climate change" is the lead retail rationale, but it is a ruse. It can be easily rationalised and integrated into large established
scientific, academic, government and industrial professional, political and social networks. It positions well into public communication and
messaging, and is subsumed into humanitarian and emotional social management themes with low or relatively isolated and unorganised public resistance.
Institutionalisation and abstraction is central to achieving passive cooperation. Psychological management of the program actors (like the abstraction
of concentration camp “doctors” or “medicalised” experiments) uses a traditional blend of diffusion, targeted power motivation, deception and
abstraction and Aesopian language and ambiguity routines, for enablers. The material suppliers are merely embedded in normalised commercial and
military purchasing routines and formatting. The reality of the "Globe Warming and Climate Change" agenda is that climate is being manipulated to warm
and modify parts of the globe in service to resource manipulation and extraction.
The earth may or may not be naturally warming, and industrial human activity may or may not be causal. But one thing appears rather clear: the
atmospheric domain is under human institutional influence if not increasingly direct technical manipulation and control. That power is not in service
to society or under open accountability: it serves special interests in the pursuit of power, profit and control. And you’re in the way.
I am fairly certain he has hit the nail on the head. He covered all of the bases.
Kudos to him for sharing.
edit on 8-2-2012 by burntheships because: (no reason given)
