It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheRedneck
reply to post by Annee
I was responding to another post that said there was no contact info on the One Million Mom's website.
Again, it seems OK for you to do a thing that you denigrate others for doing. Yes, you can protest, go to sponsors, boycott... but so can others. That's equality.
We already agreed the constitution gives everyone the right of protest.
I was not aware you had agreed with that concept.
Homosexuals don't have any less rights than anyone else. The 'rights' that are being fought for are nothing more than special privilege.
If homosexuality itself is so valid, then why must it be touted as 'equal' to heterosexuality?
I personally don't care if people are homosexual, but to shove it down people's throats with methods such as forcing homosexual propaganda into schools is not acceptable.
Schools are for teaching, not preaching....and not for brainwashing or political agendas of sexually abnormal adults or anyone else.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by TheRedneck
reply to post by Annee
I was responding to another post that said there was no contact info on the One Million Mom's website.
Again, it seems OK for you to do a thing that you denigrate others for doing. Yes, you can protest, go to sponsors, boycott... but so can others. That's equality.
I didn't do anything - - other then offer an answer to a question. The site had no contact info. It did show sponsors if someone wanted to go that far.
I did find contact info on the main site American Family - - and posted that in the next post.
We already agreed the constitution gives everyone the right of protest.
I was not aware you had agreed with that concept.
Yes - a couple of times. But that's OK - - I don't think anyone goes back and reads every post after they come back into a thread.edit on 5-2-2012 by Annee because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by suspicious22
These million moms are just voicing their displeasure with a company who chose to hire a controversial individual for their spokes person. They did not have any common interests or values with this spokes person and in their opinion it was a bad choice by J.C. Penny Company. They have the right to voice their opinion no matter what you or I think.
One Million Moms/One Million Dads project One of AFA's (American Family Assc) creations is One Million Moms and One Million Dads, two websites with the goal mobilizing parents to "stop the exploitation of children" by the media. It organizes boycotts and urges activists to send emails to mainstream companies employing advertising, selling products, or advertising on television shows they find offensive. The "One Million" in the titles of the projects appears to be a completely arbitrary number, as it is not based on any actual survey of group members, let alone how many members might be mothers or fathers. en.wikipedia.org...
Labeled a hate group Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), in a 2005 report, stated that the AFA, along with other groups, engaged in hate speech to "help drive the religious right's anti-gay crusade." Mark Potok of the SPLC determined that the turning point was 2003's Lawrence v. Texas, in which the Supreme Court struck down Texas's anti-sodomy laws. After that, the Christian right spent millions on advertisements, and on pastor briefings organized by activists such as born-again Christian David Lane. Lane helped AFA put constitutional opposite-sex marriage amendments on the ballots of 13 states. In November 2010, the SPLC changed their listing of AFA from a group that used hate speech to the more serious one of being designated a hate group. Potok said that the AFA's "propagation of known falsehoods and demonizing propaganda" was the basis for the change. The AFA was greatly displeased with the designation as a hate group, calling the list "slanderous". In response to the SPLC's announcement, some members of the Christian right "call[ed] on Congress to cut off their funding." J. Matt Barber of The Washington Times said that the SPLC was "marginalizing" themselves by giving the AFA the same hate group designation shared by the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis. en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
are same sex couples allowed to be married?
are they allowed the same benefits and privileges married couples enjoy?
how would giving them these rights be considered a special privilege?
if people of color are so equal - why did they have to fight so hard simply to be considered human?
describe this homosexual propaganda that's being forced on children in school - go ahead - let's see what you've got
please try to remember you just said this
Originally posted by Charmed707
Marriage is not a right.
Originally posted by Charmed707
What about young children having to read such non-sense as 'Heather Has Two Mommies'?
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
You know what I find interesting is that counterculture in the 60's was that free love meant that people should be able to live together without that darned piece of paper that chained you to someone legally like a ball and chain. It was counterculture practice to attack the traditional institution of marriage. This had it's part in the attempt by leftists to destroy our culture and part of the communist subversion. Now, today, since traditional values were altered and nobody cares anymore if you get married or have children out of wedlock, the next step in destroying the natural family is to demand that gays have a right to marry, and in doing so, redefine what marriage is, thus destroying the traditional archetype of the family even further.
So we've gone from "who needs that piece of paper to be happy" to "why can't gays have that piece of paper too".
Interesting transition.
You cannot have it both ways, stop trying.
You attack others and groups you disagree with, thats all.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
You know what I find interesting is that counterculture in the 60's was that free love meant that people should be able to live together without that darned piece of paper that chained you to someone legally like a ball and chain. .
Could it be that the counterculture was against the state's involvement of marriage?
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
So we've gone from "who needs that piece of paper to be happy" to "why can't gays have that piece of paper too".
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
You know what I find interesting is that counterculture in the 60's was that free love meant that people should be able to live together without that darned piece of paper that chained you to someone legally like a ball and chain. .
Open and understanding - - yep that's you
The 60s was about anti-establishment - - all of it.
It wasn't an attack on marriage.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Once again you are attacking my personal character, par for the course Annee.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
You know what I find interesting is that counterculture in the 60's was that free love meant that people should be able to live together without that darned piece of paper that chained you to someone legally like a ball and chain. .
Open and understanding - - yep that's you
The 60s was about anti-establishment - - all of it.
It wasn't an attack on marriage.