It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Patriotsrevenge
So you want to start a nuke war just cause you lost a carrier?
Wait a minute, I thought we were telling Iran that they cant have nukes and we go and use it on them??
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Patriotsrevenge
Tracking is different than engaging with 100% success. Sure I can see 100 deer on a field, does that mean I can use my gun to take them all out while they are charging me?
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Subjective Truth
If they sunk a carrier because the USA started a war, tough luck, we shouldn't be there trying to stir up trouble
Originally posted by DankKing420
reply to post by seabag
maybe because its not a WEAPONS program?
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Subjective Truth
If they sunk a carrier because the USA started a war, tough luck, we shouldn't be there trying to stir up trouble
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Patriotsrevenge
So you want to start a nuke war just cause you lost a carrier?
Wait a minute, I thought we were telling Iran that they cant have nukes and we go and use it on them??
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Acid_Burn2009
Have they tried to launch 100 missiles at it in a real live test simulation where it succeeded? If each missile was launched at the same range and time, each target will have the same priority. The computer classifies the target according to speed, angle, range etc...if each target has the same priority then the computer has a difficult time deciding which one to shoot first because it wont matter. Conclusion = dead carrier.
Originally posted by Mister_Bit
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Patriotsrevenge
So you want to start a nuke war just cause you lost a carrier?
Wait a minute, I thought we were telling Iran that they cant have nukes and we go and use it on them??
The double standards are amazing aren't they..
Hey, we can't let Iran have a nuclear bomb because they may start WW3....
But hey, if they sink one of our ships, we'll use a nuclear bomb and start WW3
Originally posted by DankKing420
reply to post by seabag
maybe because its not a WEAPONS program?
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Acid_Burn2009
Have they tried to launch 100 missiles at it in a real live test simulation where it succeeded? If each missile was launched at the same range and time, each target will have the same priority. The computer classifies the target according to speed, angle, range etc...if each target has the same priority then the computer has a difficult time deciding which one to shoot first because it wont matter. Conclusion = dead carrier.
If they struck mainland USA. You would see huge contracts for getting out oil in contaminated areas. Because Iran and it's people would be glass.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Acid_Burn2009
Have they tried to launch 100 missiles at it in a real live test simulation where it succeeded? If each missile was launched at the same range and time, each target will have the same priority. The computer classifies the target according to speed, angle, range etc...if each target has the same priority then the computer has a difficult time deciding which one to shoot first because it wont matter. Conclusion = dead carrier.