It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Patriotsrevenge
Tracking is different than engaging with 100% success. Sure I can see 100 deer on a field, does that mean I can use my gun to take them all out while they are charging me?
Originally posted by Patriotsrevenge
reply to post by Doom and Gloom
I don't think they will send a Carrier through until A destroyer or two goes through without harassment. Carriers normally stand off and strike at will so the enemy can only guess where they are.
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
Originally posted by TheMindWar
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
I heard an article today by a couple of individuals who work at the pentagon who state many in the pentagon believe or "know" that Iran does have at least three nukes. I understand it may just be propaganda, but they went on to say that the problem Iran has is the delivery system. Its easy to build nukes but its difficult to place them on warheads (which they are close to achieving within 12 months). Personally I have no problem with iran having nukes, afterall Isreal has them.
As for a delivery system, iran has the capability to deliver such nukes by hand. It would not suprise me at all if the US mainland and isreal was struck if iran is attacked.
If they struck mainland USA. You would see huge contracts for getting out oil in contaminated areas. Because Iran and it's people would be glass.
This is the simple truth.
Originally posted by AnonymousCitizen
Originally posted by Patriotsrevenge
reply to post by Doom and Gloom
I don't think they will send a Carrier through until A destroyer or two goes through without harassment. Carriers normally stand off and strike at will so the enemy can only guess where they are.
Carriers are sort of hard to hide, no?
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by thelastlineofwhat
I think the SeaRAM + CIWS was specficially designed to handle the sunburn, but maybe not in a salvo attack. I could be wrong, as USA does tend to hype up systems and they fail miserably, case in point: the patriot missile defense in the Iraq war Part 1.
I am wondering if the SM-3 would be able to handle it well, once again in a salvo attack the carrier is dead no matter how good the missile is.
Lets say the combination system is 99% good (highly exaggerating), it will only take 200 missiles to get two to get through.edit on 11-1-2012 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
reply to post by Maxatoria
If there is another carrier coming that makes the magic number 3. If they have 3 in the area something is coming and coming very soon.
Originally posted by Patriotsrevenge
Originally posted by AnonymousCitizen
Originally posted by Patriotsrevenge
reply to post by Doom and Gloom
I don't think they will send a Carrier through until A destroyer or two goes through without harassment. Carriers normally stand off and strike at will so the enemy can only guess where they are.
Carriers are sort of hard to hide, no?
They keep them up to a thousand miles away at times and the air ops constantly jam the enemies radars so no they are easily hid. Our carriers are way to deadly for Iran and they simply don't stand a chance.
Originally posted by schuyler
This is completely consistent with standard Navy policy for over a year. 75% of the time there are two CVN Carrier Strike Groups in the area. A carrier Strike Group has ABOUT (it's a fluid kind of thing) ten ships altogether, including a squadron of destroyers, a cruiser, some frigates, and a supply ship in addition to at least one attack sub.
We go through this every time a Strike Group shows up. This is completely normal in all respects. It does NOT show an "escalation" of tensions. It is NOT a prelude to WW III. It does NOT represent an invasion force against Iran.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
They wont last long if WW3 breaks out. Iran has home base advantage. Shooting 500 missiles at one CBG is sure to take it out. This will only happen if they do war in the strait.
USA only has the advantage if they are out in the open, then Iran has no chance.
Originally posted by AnonymousCitizen
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
reply to post by Maxatoria
If there is another carrier coming that makes the magic number 3. If they have 3 in the area something is coming and coming very soon.
This reply seems to indicate a third is on the way.