It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Did ya ever think we might have some tech we were holding on to just for a occasion like this?
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Subjective Truth
If they struck mainland USA. You would see huge contracts for getting out oil in contaminated areas. Because Iran and it's people would be glass.
Iran has no desire to strike the mainland USA as much as you would like to see it to appease yourself. Have they stated that they would like to strike the mainland?
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Subjective Truth
Did ya ever think we might have some tech we were holding on to just for a occasion like this?
Did ya ever think that Iran might have some tech they were holding on to just ofr an occasion like this? I bet you were suprised when Iran took out the drone didnt you?
If you go back to my original thread I stated that they may be able to take out a ship, not the entire group.
Then how do you know what they want or what they will do when pushed
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
reply to post by Maxatoria
If there is another carrier coming that makes the magic number 3. If they have 3 in the area something is coming and coming very soon.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Subjective Truth
Then how do you know what they want or what they will do when pushed
Oh so you want to push them and when they defend themselves you want to say, see I was right they would attack?
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
reply to post by Maxatoria
If there is another carrier coming that makes the magic number 3. If they have 3 in the area something is coming and coming very soon.
In this case, probably not. Three ACTIVE carriers in place does, indeed, trigger alarm bells. But as sirric said, if the Lincoln is simply to relieve the Stennis, then we aren't really talking three carriers. Carrier deployments to that area are usually five to seven months, including transit time. The Stennis is coming up on five months, so they're running out of Diet Coke. Normally on the way back they'll visit a port of call. the Stennis is a west coast carrier, so it will head back to the Pacific.
This will be the Lincoln's last deployment for several years because after this it will head, probably through the Med, to the east coast for refueling starting the summer of 2012.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Subjective Truth
Technology matters a lot, no denying it, but skill strategy and the desire to defend the homeland matter more. If China invaded the USA, i would defend the USA as best I could not matter what tech China had.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by Subjective Truth
Technology matters a lot, no denying it, but skill strategy and the desire to defend the homeland matter more. If China invaded the USA, i would defend the USA as best I could not matter what tech China had.
Originally posted by Dachende
ahh the joy of reading ignorant patriotic americans blabber.
This won't be another "Iraq"
Even your own defence advisors are saying it will take alot more than a ground and pound campaign to take down iran.
I find it laughable when people say if iran took out a carrier, they'd be glass.
is that all it would take for you trigger happy war mongers to drop a nuke ? 10k people ?
Around the world, the amount of people that die directly as a result of your global agenda per couple of months and that's all it would take to drop a nuke ? .
YEEHAW !
This place always reminds me of that southpark episode where cartman is trying to get himself stupid and poor enough to drive nascar. Let's face it, you're all qualified.
edit on 11/1/2012 by Dachende because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by michael1983l
I dont hate the USA, I hate the leaders who are running it.