It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by casenately
I think it is important to note that an "enemy" still within his borders cannot be in an aggressive stance. If international waters are just that, international domain, they can send their entire armada and still be in their legal right to be there. It is a precarious situation but it is not illegal, much like it is not illegal for the US to send its forces. The question is whether it is indicative of war or not. The US leadership has already made it clear that it would not mind having a war with Iran. The American people on the other hand do not want it.
It is sad as Americans that our will is deaf to leadership and that our congress is there as a side note to history. The very notion of due process could prevent this war if congress would be asked, as it is supposed to be, what do the people want you to vote for. What do the American people think is best for the American people.
The military is there to serve as our defense, not as our moral guide. The president is there to see the needs and propose to congress means to solve those problems. Congress is in theory the representation of the people and listen to the will of the people. The whole system has been circumvented and is being exploited with a loophole.
It is like the Cuban missile crisis. Kennedy didn't want to send in spy planes because he knew they would be shot at, as did the military. That would have been the spark to light the flame. We are all better for those brave pilots lying about being shot at so as to prolong negotiations and keep the peace. Eventually Cuba disarmed and the Russians went home. The story would have been different if war had broken out. We all see that.
Originally posted by princeofpeace
Where is the charles de gaulle? Now that thing is bad@ss too.....Is it coming to Iran?
Originally posted by princeofpeace
The real question is will this carrier pass through the straight of Hormuz and call Iran's bluff?
Originally posted by princeofpeace
How long has the De Gaulle been there?
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Originally posted by princeofpeace
How long has the De Gaulle been there?
I think it arrived today. So who knows how long it'll be there.
Originally posted by Patriotsrevenge
reply to post by thelastlineofwhat
Our Carriers can take multiple hits from them. The only thing that can sink one is a nuclear weapon right on her deck or from under by torpedo. Iran simply has no chance of sinking one.
Originally posted by Dachende
ahh the joy of reading ignorant patriotic americans blabber.
This won't be another "Iraq"
Even your own defence advisors are saying it will take alot more than a ground and pound campaign to take down iran.
I find it laughable when people say if iran took out a carrier, they'd be glass.
is that all it would take for you trigger happy war mongers to drop a nuke ? 10k people ?
Around the world, the amount of people that die directly as a result of your global agenda per couple of months and that's all it would take to drop a nuke ? .
YEEHAW !
This place always reminds me of that southpark episode where cartman is trying to get himself stupid and poor enough to drive nascar. Let's face it, you're all qualified.
edit on 11/1/2012 by Dachende because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Dachende
ahh the joy of reading ignorant patriotic americans blabber.
This won't be another "Iraq"
Even your own defence advisors are saying it will take alot more than a ground and pound campaign to take down iran.
I find it laughable when people say if iran took out a carrier, they'd be glass.
is that all it would take for you trigger happy war mongers to drop a nuke ? 10k people ?
Around the world, the amount of people that die directly as a result of your global agenda per couple of months and that's all it would take to drop a nuke ? .
YEEHAW !
This place always reminds me of that southpark episode where cartman is trying to get himself stupid and poor enough to drive nascar. Let's face it, you're all qualified.
Originally posted by Patriotsrevenge
reply to post by thelastlineofwhat
Our Carriers can take multiple hits from them. The only thing that can sink one is a nuclear weapon right on her deck or from under by torpedo. Iran simply has no chance of sinking one.
The only thing that can sink one is a nuclear weapon right on her deck
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
They wont last long if WW3 breaks out. Iran has home base advantage. Shooting 500 missiles at one CBG is sure to take it out. This will only happen if they do war in the strait.
USA only has the advantage if they are out in the open, then Iran has no chance.edit on 11-1-2012 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)
If they do manage to sink a carrier they would seal not only there fate but Syria's as well. And I would venture to say Pakistan also.
If the people have something to rally behind this will get really ugly and fast.
Nobody wants to nuke Iran and it will not happen. There will be no need. The U.S. military is quite capable of using conventional weapons and taking out every military site in the country before any American or NATO boots hit the on the ground. However, if Iran uses any nuclear power against U.S. Forces I would think the global warming thing would be over with Iran reflecting all their sunlight back into space.
Originally posted by superman2012
reply to post by Nite_wing
Yes, the US military is great at conventional weapons and warfare, however, they have not won one "war" when it wasn't two opponents on an open battlefield.
Originally posted by thelastlineofwhat
Iran only needs 1 per ship with these babies, Russian-made 3M-82 Moskit anti-ship cruise missiles (NATO designation: SS-N-22 Sunburn. Maybe lauch 2-3 / ship and its a sure hit.
Originally posted by snowcrash911
Originally posted by superman2012
reply to post by Nite_wing
Yes, the US military is great at conventional weapons and warfare, however, they have not won one "war" when it wasn't two opponents on an open battlefield.
What do you mean? In WW II, the US fought Germany, Japan and Italy simultaneously.
Originally posted by jerico65
Originally posted by thelastlineofwhat
Iran only needs 1 per ship with these babies, Russian-made 3M-82 Moskit anti-ship cruise missiles (NATO designation: SS-N-22 Sunburn. Maybe lauch 2-3 / ship and its a sure hit.
Holy schmokes, not the Sunburn! *gasp*
Hmmm....how long have they been around. Think that maybe, just maybe, the US Navy figured out some TTPs to counter them by now?