Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Fake Earth illusion - footage from Apollo 11, 1969

page: 12
105
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 02:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by onewithall
reply to post by Sensi
 


Thanks!

I found it on this website: www.chrisroubis.com/2012/01/fake-man-on-the-moon-footage-1969-ap ollo-11-mission/


Yea anybody who watches this and still believes the official story is going to feel pretty dumb once the truth is told to the public.

People's ego's have been trained so they always think "they" are right.....it's hard to except you've been tricked.




posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 02:54 PM
link   


So, Russia, the Soviet Union, had probes all over the moon for years. They should be kind enough to provide the clear evidence of the landing sites, as observed by their rovers and orbital missions.


Why would they need to be kind enough to provide evidence anyway? The Soviets NEVER doubted that we went to the moon.

As it comes down to camera systems of the various international lunar probes, they were not designed to image objects of very small scale.



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 03:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by NuminousCosmos


So, Russia, the Soviet Union, had probes all over the moon for years. They should be kind enough to provide the clear evidence of the landing sites, as observed by their rovers and orbital missions.


Why would they need to be kind enough to provide evidence anyway? The Soviets NEVER doubted that we went to the moon.

As it comes down to camera systems of the various international lunar probes, they were not designed to image objects of very small scale.



Lets not be naive. The Soviets had 2 rovers on the moon. They had 20 successful missions to the moon. Are you suggesting there would be no scientific value for them to observe or photograph landing sites?
Thats absurd. Studying those sites would provide invaluable information for future landing missions.

They would have studied them completely and have very clear video and photographs of all the landing sites.

I know I should not show you this. It will break your heart.
www.sciencedaily.com...

So then we can see the Soviet lunar rover, we can see the tracks, but not the Apollo Missions?
tsk tsk Someone open a window, it smells fishy in here.



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 03:28 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 03:30 PM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 

Unless I've missed the glaringly obvious,how can this be identified as any type of lunar rover,especially a Russian lunar rover?

edit on 11-1-2012 by Imagewerx because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 03:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by PaulProteus
If you want to see all of the hoax believers "evidence" of not landing to the moon completely shattered, go here:
www.badastronomy.com...

Beware, hoax believers, and prepare to be educated in physics.


excellent site P! answers every question put forth by the moon landing hoax believers. The answers are simple to read and undertstand. you and phage are the voice of reason, but some people will not listen to reason and will never "get it".



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 03:40 PM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


Perhaps this link will give you an idea that there are pictures of the Apollo landing sites.

Recent Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Views Of Apollo 12

There are many others. A simple web search of Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter will bring them up.



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 03:45 PM
link   
I watched the video as well as the video with Buzz knocking that guy in the face -HELL YEA- lol that jackass deserved it. I believe we made it to the moon hell there were soo many people monitoring their transmissions "like the Soviets" etc... I truly believe if it was fake the second world power at the time would tell the entire world!!! I mean look at how much technology has jumped up in such a fast an alarming way.

However I wouldn't be surprised if he wasnt the first man on the moon or we or "they" already had a colony over there and that we blacked out and heavily censored their footage. These men were pioneers with balls of steel and would never have deceived us about the moon landing... however what they saw when they went "exploring" might have jilted their views but since they're patriots and devout men they would perform their duty and "forget" anything they were told to forget for America's sake since we were in a Cold War. Even now all the moon landing astronauts seems extremely knowledgable and give non-waivering accounts of their trips which I believe, but I also believe they've left out certain important details as well...



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 04:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Gibborium
 


They'll just claim that NASA faked the images. Always an excuse when the facts don't support their lunatic theories.



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 04:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


How come the picture of Earth as seen in the video, matches up exactly with the NOOA satellite picture of the same date featuring the portion showing hurricane Bernice, and also the photographic asa image.



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 04:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rocketman7

Lets not be naive. The Soviets had 2 rovers on the moon. They had 20 successful missions to the moon. Are you suggesting there would be no scientific value for them to observe or photograph landing sites?


Oh please, do link us to the 22 successful Soviet missions to the moon. I understand the Lunokhod 1 (renamed because the first Lunokhod blew up on the launchpad) took 14 close up pictures of the Moon and 12 panoramic views, during 10 communication sessions, over a year after the Americans walked on the moon. So I'm a bit under informed of the 21 other successes.


And how disingenuous you are since we have better images of the Apollo landing sites than the short lived Lunokhod rovers. I'd be ashamed to present that in such a way you did. You seem to have such hate inside.

To me, it doesn't matter where extraterrestrial data comes from, so long as we have it to study. Apparently it is other things to other people, that probably have no interest in the studies, that have some burr up their crack, and have to voice it on the internet clogging true information searches because that's how information search engines work, by volume. Congrats, I'm now stupider after wasting my time reading and replying to that.



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 04:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gibborium
reply to post by Rocketman7
 


Perhaps this link will give you an idea that there are pictures of the Apollo landing sites.

Recent Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Views Of Apollo 12

There are many others. A simple web search of Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter will bring them up.
It's amazing what you can do with Photoshop these days....



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 04:17 PM
link   
So many flat out ignoring any evidence except that which agrees with their skewed view of things. They'll believe some random idiot for little reason other than they say something that 'goes against the grain'.

I see people talking about cardboard in the window and what not, yet I never once saw anything to show me there was anything artificial in the _..therefore I especially didn't see something so specific I could say it was a cardboard cutout. Also, as many have said many times over...there is absolutely no way to make the Earth look that far away from LEO....I don't care how good you are with cardboard and scissors or what you do with the zoom. Taking something that literally would fill your entire view out the window and only show you a fraction of the planets surface from that side doesn't simply change into seeing the distinct entire view of the side of the planet by arts and crafts.

There's simply too much to just dismiss out of hand and little to no reason for other countries to waste their time on proving it to the uneducated US population that our country did what the rest of the world has accepted for some 40 years now. The moon is a big place and there's much more benefit to going somewhere new than constantly surveying the same sites because some kids keep saying it's all a lie.

As far as the Buzz thing with that harassing punk. You walk up to any grown man and start harassing him as that guy did, and you're likely to get far worse than a single punch. I would dare anyone to walk up to a member of the military that was deployed and fought in Iraq and start calling them names like that and you'll be lucky if even a trip to the hospital is the least of your worries.

To the Bible part of it...the guy ambushed and started harassing him...there's absolutely no reason to indulge an idiot and I can't imagine any single person who would give that jerk the time of day let alone swear anything on the Bible in that situation. Besides, if he had sworn on the Bible, then you'd all be decrying him for lying on the Bible because it would literally prove nothing. A book doesn't somehow magically cause a person to be truthful. I got a copy of Tolkien somewhere I could swear something on, doesn't make it anymore likely to be true than putting my hand on any other book and doing the same.

This is a flame topic plain and simple because that's usually all it ends up causing....we went and that's all there is to it. There's more than enough evidence to support that we did. Why anyone would be willing to just reject it out of hand is beyond me, but I truly don't believe that there aren't those that stir this up just to cause arguments about it even if they don't believe what they say.

If anyone thinks that NASA is getting some crazy funding that they're just blowing down the toilet, they seriously need to do some research as to how much money NASA gets.



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 04:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by jtap66
reply to post by Gibborium
 


They'll just claim that NASA faked the images. Always an excuse when the facts don't support their lunatic theories.
Hmm, now who else uses that to explain away images that don't fit into their world view?

Did they fake all the NASA UFO footage too? Or was that Lunacognita? Or conspiracy junkies? Or is it real?
edit on 11/1/12 by Pimander because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 04:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Dashdragon
 

Can anyone on this site tell the difference between a joke and a serious point? I'm not sure whether I'm allowed to have fun here any more or not sometimes.

edit on 11/1/12 by Pimander because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 04:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by onewithall
 

This is an excerpt from A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon. Its quite an apic docu, as they go.
Expect debunkers in 5....4.....3....


You don't want de-bunkers ?

That seems like a very close minded attitude



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 04:21 PM
link   
reply to post by Pimander
 




Did they fake all the NASA UFO footage too? Or was that Lunacognita? Or conspiracy junkies. Or is it real?

It's real. And subject to gross misinterpretation of what is seen in it. Similar to what Sibrel did with the Apollo footage.
edit on 1/11/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 04:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by NuminousCosmos


So, Russia, the Soviet Union, had probes all over the moon for years. They should be kind enough to provide the clear evidence of the landing sites, as observed by their rovers and orbital missions.


Why would they need to be kind enough to provide evidence anyway? The Soviets NEVER doubted that we went to the moon.

As it comes down to camera systems of the various international lunar probes, they were not designed to image objects of very small scale.


This made me laugh so hard, the footage i have seen of a general from the KGB sat at a desk with NASA images of the moon saying to the interviewer.
"Within two hours our specialists had categorically stated, and proven, that the photos were faked in a studio".
Certainly the russians were not applauding american honesty with this kind of statement.


link 1

link 2

The russians regarded the NASA apollo missions as a propaganda stunt.
edit on 11-1-2012 by The X because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 04:42 PM
link   
I just don’t understand why other countries aren’t making it to the moon? Is our tech today not as advanced as it was back then? Am I missing something? You would think by now that the Russians, Chinese, Japan, UK, etc... would have landing missions on the moon for the entire world to see. Can someone explain why that is not possible?



posted on Jan, 11 2012 @ 04:43 PM
link   
Why is our goverment so fragile to a revolution by risking such huge illusions like this? & thats without mentioning thousands of other obviously staged events in our history.
edit on 11-1-2012 by henryjonesjr because: (no reason given)





new topics

top topics



 
105
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join