It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Truth4Thought
reply to post by Zander2533
Interesting theory, I have always wondered about this region.
Thank you for sharing
Originally posted by ManjushriPrajna
The Buddha's Dharma and Laozhu's Tao share many similarities, but Laozhu came much time after Buddha, and his Tao also has many differences from the teachings of the Buddha. But any serious student of Eastern philosophy and thought systems should look at all of them, even Hindu, Confucius, and Shinto.
Originally posted by ManjushriPrajna
Sorry then, I was mistaken. Also, I meant taking your own time to look at all sides. Buddhism compliments Christianity, just as Hindu compliments Islam and Islam compliments Judaism, so on and so forth. No path is greater, as long as you follow truth.
Originally posted by coredrill
reply to post by Zander2533
This is the first time i have heard about Buddha being born out of his mother's arm pit.
Buddha never went anywhere but roamed around northern part of the indian sub continent.
Originally posted by coredrill
reply to post by Zander2533
I dont know.
I have read many books on Buddha, have been to Bodhgaya (during the time i worked in Bihar, in India), have had buddhist friends in Kolkatta (in West Bengal, India), discussed with them and of course his life has been taught in school, but i never have heard about this aspect of Buddha's birth.
Could you provide me some links pertaining to this Birth from Arm pit stuff? its quite intriguing.
Originally posted by ancientthunder
reply to post by Zander2533
Nice idea, but they may have both been awakened ones, but the birth origin (arm pit) is not true. None the less, we can never be sure about history. What we can do is read there teachings and from them realize that someone very special was on earth and gifted us with their experience and that's meaningful. Their approaches to teaching were very different, more than likely because of the culture where they taught.As I looked deeper in to any persons life, I found that the time that they were born , was less and less relevant. Only their teachings really remain and even they are updated.
Originally posted by arpgme
Lao Tzu and Buddha lived in different times, and the only thing we know about Lao Tzu is what he written in the Tao Te Ching. It's just a Myth that he was born that way.
Also, the teachings are different...
Buddha taught to get rid of desire to free oneself to get to enlightenment and die and go to nirvana so that you won't have to keep getting born and dying again and again.
Lao Tzu taught to go with the flow of nature. Going with the flow, simplicity, and living in moderation is what is best, and going against nature will result in difficulty/complexity.
They both taught Compassion (Love) which is apparent in all religions.
Originally posted by arpgme
That's an interesting theory that he may have come back as The Buddha. That is possible, I guess.
But Buddha taught to gain enlightenment but having compassion and letting go of desire.
Lao Tzu said that going with the Flow/Tao IS enlightenment. The wise-men are wise because they understand the way...
However...
Lao Tzu said that being with desire and being without desire comes from the same source. Without desire you see the mysteries and with desire you see its boundaries/manifestations.
He was not teaching to give up desire, just to go with the flow and to even accept desire when it comes. He did not see it as "unenlightening" or "wrong" to have desire. Just different.
Originally posted by luciddream
I don't know if Buddha and Lao Tzu could be the same person...
Buddha is from Indian sub continent
Lao Tzu is Chinese
Buddha traveled East/South East (within Asia)
Lao Tzu traveled west?
There is also Bodhi Dharma, he was around 5-6 AD, also the inventor of Shaolin Kung Fu and heis from Indian Sub Continent, he also travled to East.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
I hope more may share their knowledge. It's always good to understand perspectives.
Rather than to rely on myths, mankind do have historical facts to rely on.
Buddha was an actual mortal that lived during the time of 400BC in India. His name was Siddhārtha Gautama, born into a royal family, shielded from the harshness of life till he ventured out on his own for years in search for the truth on existential conditions of humans.
He finally went into deep meditation for a number of days, and 'somehow' found enlightenment. Many present day humans would simply claimed that he must have lost his mind after such deep meditations. However, when he began his teachings, it made so much sense to many, with advices that actually worked even today, such claims of insanity are misplaced or even misinformed.
What he taught was basically A WAY OF LIFE. He promoted no religion, but only how mankind can live and co-exist, and progress within a civilised society. He never claimed that there was no Creator or the divine, but only that there are no intermediaries between man and Creator, similar in this manner to what the Islamic prophet Muhammad had taught.
When he died, he reminded his disciples that there should be no leader, just as the Messiah and the prophet Muhammad had done, each human to simply follow the teachings taught. He, like many divine teachers sent to Earth, knew the greed and corruption of humanity, espacially the greed of power that corrupts absolutely, thus such reminders.
Lao Zi came from China during the time of 500BC. China's historical records showed that it was already a flourishing society, but still at the evolutionary stage just like India then with the enslaving caste system being the central pillar.
What he taught was similar in many ways to Buddha's teachings - a way of life and freedom for the masses needing no leader but only one's self cultivation of conscience to contribute to society.
Did every one of those divine teachers succeed in changing mankind? Caste system Monarchy has ended, tyrannies such as USSR had fallen,etc. The influence is there, but the end result of a better society and civilisation is yet to come, and with an internet wired to a better informed and educated world, that day will arrive soon.edit on 12-1-2012 by SeekerofTruth101 because: (no reason given)