It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
....virginia emt and he said that he was at the pentagon 3 hours after it was attacked. he told me that he found body parts and had photos of the 757 wreckage (i have not, to date have seen these photos).
i believe that a missile hit the pentagon
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by cydonia19.5
And yet, there was the DNA of passengers and crew, the Flight Recorder, the eyewitnesses......the damage path, the airplane specific parts and debris......the Radar tracking, etc.......all thoroughly explained countless times.
I think flight 93 is what you would be interested in.
Although he did not personally travel to the U.S. for his research and does not claim to be an expert, Meyssan bases his theory -- and now a follow up book defending his theory -- on his own analysis of official documents.
He also uses photographs which he says do not show much that looks like an airplane and do show a hole in the Pentagon which is too small, he claims, to be caused by a jumbo jet.
But photographs Meyssan left out, including some by CNN's Pentagon Correspondent Jamie McIntyre, picture debris that clearly came from the hijacked plane.
A Pentagon spokesperson, Victoria Clarke, called the book disgusting.
Originally posted by cydonia19.5
have been out of the loop for about a year or so but would like to say that i know a member of the fairfax, virginia emt and he said that he was at the pentagon 3 hours after it was attacked. he told me that he found body parts and had photos of the 757 wreckage (i have not, to date have seen these photos). i believe that a missile hit the pentagon, not an airplane. will keep all posted and will forward his photos if they should arrive.
Originally posted by freedom12
reply to post by grey580
Except that the thread you used as a "debunking" thread, can't explain why investigators can't come up with any parts, with stamped part numbers, from the plane it says impacted the Pentagon.
It doesn't explain why the windows are intact above the hole were the plane "supposedly went into.
And that's just a few things!!!
.....can't explain why investigators can't come up with any parts, with stamped part numbers, from the plane it says impacted the Pentagon.
It doesn't explain why the windows are intact above the hole were the plane "supposedly went into.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by pocketsando
This one?
"NO PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON" only once aired report
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by Reheat
It's in the first few seconds, the very first question in fact. The order to shoot it down would, I assume, be more or less immediately obeyed. "That's an order soldier!" kind of thing, no?
Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by freedom12
I wish I could find it. But there was a great show on the discovery channel I believe on how the pentagon was built.
Since its a military installation. Everything in there was reinforced.
Originally posted by grey580
Probably why the windows weren't damaged. Probably hurricane / high wind impact rated glass.