It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mugger
Coca Cola, Pepsi, the lists can go on.
Yes, the government has created some technology from the space program, but it still goes back to the individual that created it.
Without sycophanting or parasiting the thread, comes down to you are a country that is attacked by another country. Do you feel safer trusting McDonald's or Coke to save you from getting bombed or putting trust in the government (of your country)? What do you believe tax dollars and your citizenry and voting supports?
For the majority of its history, space exploration in America has been funded privately. The trend of wealthy individuals, such as Paul Allen, Jeff Bezos, Robert Bigelow, and Elon Musk, devoting some of their resources to the exploration of space is not an emerging one, it is the long-run, dominant trend which is now re-emerging.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by madhatr137
Private industry did not wait for government to build roads, streets and highways and freeways before they invented and developed automobiles, and private industry did not wait for government to create regulatory agencies regulating flight before airplanes were invented and developed, nor did private industry wait for government to pave the way for them in space. Indeed, the United States had no interest in space, or satellites until the Soviet Union launched Sputnik. Once Sputnik was launched, the arrogance of government claimed space as their domain, and in doing so slowed down space exploration, not sped it up.
For the majority of its history, space exploration in America has been funded privately. The trend of wealthy individuals, such as Paul Allen, Jeff Bezos, Robert Bigelow, and Elon Musk, devoting some of their resources to the exploration of space is not an emerging one, it is the long-run, dominant trend which is now re-emerging.
~Alex MacDonald~ quoted here.
Originally posted by heyitsphil
What?
The only reason government GOT the human race to space is because the commercial and private industry simply was not ready for it yet, technology had not advanced far enough, and private industries weren't confident in putting men in to at that time an untested environement, and they especially weren't keen on butting in on the U.S Russia Space race. I understand your point that often profit does not bring the great visions of Armstrong jumping off the lunar lander and stuff, but you are not realizing that PRIVATE and GOVERNMENT space agencies are seperate. You cannot tell me it would NOT be beneficial to society to let the two work hand in hand, it would benefit fiscally as well as exploratory, not to mention the technology that would be introduced in to society.
Show me NASA or ESA's starship vessel? Seriously?
**BY ALL MEANS BUTT IN!! Should one believe that?!
Jeff Bezos and Robert Bigelow are proof that space was slowed down because Government claimed space as their own domain based on arogance?
There is a world of difference between flying To space (and to be truthful, even the vaunted X-15 only made it to the "Edge" of space), and actually flying IN Space.
At their barest minimum, Governments exist to provide for the welfare of their citizens: to protect, preserve, defend, and nurture the individuals who formed and maintain that self-same body we call a government.
At their Best, governments also represent and effect the hopes, dreams, and aspirations of the citizens they serve.
Because if we are too cheap to spend for the Future, we likely wont have much of a future to spend. Businesses don't work like that.
Top R&D Spenders Of The S&P Company Ticker R&D Expense (Last 12 Months)
Merck & Co Inc MRK 10,808.50
Pfizer Inc. PFE 9,264.00
Microsoft Corp. MSFT 9,043.00
Johnson & Johnson JNJ 7,259.00
Intel Corp. INTC 7,248.00
International Business Machines Corp. IBM 6,198.00
Cisco Systems Inc. CSCO 5,730.00
Eli Lilly & Co. LLY 5,042.50
Oracle Corp. ORCL 4,519.00
Google Inc. Cl A GOOG 4,505.00
Originally posted by Vardoger
Depends on which government.....
As was discussed in the Chinese space program thread not to long ago I think China would have a much easier time than say the US in space exploration. China would have less regulations and therefor could take more risks, for cheaper (due to basically slave labor). Human life wouldn't mean as much and if accidents happened there would not be the legal wall to slog through that would be built up if it were in a "western" country.
Of course that is just speculation/opinion.
Also if helium 3 becomes a legitimate fuel source I think you may see a lot more private sector businesses trying to mine the moon because there would be a ton of $$$$$$ in it.
These programs were nothing more than capsules placed on top of rockets and the astronauts that manned them were given tasks that monkeys did before them. Conversely, the North American X-15 (a direct result of the Bell X-1 series) has, to date, made two officially qualified space flights. The difference is that the X-15 can handle aerodynamics and fly in Earths atmosphere. Given that the X-1 series predated the space race and given their evolution has shown us that they certainly can fly into space, then it is logically argued that the 21.5 billion spent on Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo was nothing more than a very expensive dog and pony show and the money was better spent developing the X-class series jets.
NASA administrator Michael D. Griffin argued in a 2007 paper that the Saturn program, if continued, could have provided six manned launches per year — two of them to the moon — at the same cost as the Shuttle program, with an additional ability to loft infrastructure for further missions:
If we had done all this, we would be on Mars today, not writing about it as a subject for “the next 50 years.” We would have decades of experience operating long-duration space systems in Earth orbit, and similar decades of experience in exploring and learning to utilize the Moon.[27]
No.. Just stop. You seem to know nothing about spaceflight and orbital mechanics. X-15 was a glorified plane, and had no potential to achieve real orbit with 60s technology. It was also not the goal of the program. From the point of manned spaceflight (in its real definition - stable orbit, not simple hops) it was a waste of money. We cant even make SSTO now!
The X-15 was a research scientist's dream. The experimental, rocket-boosted aircraft flew 199 flights with 12 different pilots at the controls from 1959 through 1968. It captured vital data on the effects of hypersonic flight on man and machine that proved invaluable to the nation's aeronautics researchers, including NASA and developers of the space shuttle. "That first powered flight was a real milestone in a program that we still benefit from today," said Engle.