Originally posted by miniatus
Question is, who funds Citizens for Ethics?
These kinds of groups spring up quite a bit and are often funded by the supporters of a rival candidate, I'm not saying this is the case.. I'm not a
fan of Santorum, I'm just saying that you should all be critical thinkers and not absorb everything you read without doing some background
investigation ..
Please take off your partisan glasses. What rival do you think is funding it since it covers EVERY SINGLE member regardless of party. How does that
even make sense? Did you read the report?
This is not an opinion hit piece. This is a compilation of violations on record committed by people we pay a lot of money to do good things for us.
Are people just looking to defend Santorum this much that they refuse to look at the facts. A congressman gets arrested, it is a fact and on record.
Making a list of times that sort of thing happens is still factual and cannot be skewed no matter who pays for it
Maybe you can explain to me how a corporation can make police records appear or dissapear?
Usually goes like this.. I'm a corporation, I know that candidate A will do things I want him to do that will help my business, my lobbyists
will succeed there, but Candidate B won't ... so I'm going to fund an organization called Citizens for All Things Awesome and we'll conduct a study
that makes Candidate B look bad.
But this did not go anything like that and anyone that read the report would see that.
Edit:
I tried looking up who owns the domain name but they have a private registration, their about us makes them seem legit and they HAVE apparently been
around for a number of years.. so they may very well be reputable =) .. I don't really know ..
edit on 1/2/2012 by miniatus because: (no reason given)
You are worried about the domain name when the violations listed are recorded facts you actually can look up.
You guys crack me up.
What do you suppose might happen if you get the domain owner? If it turns out they work for some nefarious billionaire, how exactly does he alter the
FACTUAL LIST OF VIOLATIONS?
just something I wonder.
