It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pointr97
reply to post by AzureSky
I understand completely how ispdsl which may or may not be what he is using operate...As a tech, I have seen a lot of weird issues working calls, but I have not seen too many where the end user saw the network but unable to browse....it was your off-handed dismissal of his concern that bothers me....describe one scenario in which the end user cpu saw an active network connection but could not browse?
Originally posted by ludshed
reply to post by AzureSky
You are right. You should have further explained what the "customer" doesn't know, that the whole communications industry works the same way. Doesn't matter if its TW, comcast, att, cox, brighthouse, direct, dish. After 15 years I came to the conclusion greed and quarterly numbers trump logic every time. Not to mention all the equipment we use is made by the cheapest bidder; motorola, scientific atlanta, texas instruments, 2wire, just to name the few majors for the hardware that is in the customers property. Ask the next phone/cable installer you meet how many extra boxes/modems/mtas he carries everyday. If he has to install 12 dvrs in a day he will take 16 with him. Brand new that is the fail rate. And as stated, you can have lock/sync without being able to surf for a large number of reasons. Also as stated, you could call but I wouldn't because you will never get a hold of anybody that knows why it wasn't working. That is the other thing I learned; all communications companies suck at communicating even with each other, let alone the customers.edit on 18-12-2011 by ludshed because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by pointr97
Now we have gotten to responses that the OP actually could use to better his own knowledge of the situation....I re-read the thread to make sure I wasn't doing what I accused others of. The responses before my initial post were mostly off-handed comments that didn't help. The last couple actually explained to the OP some of the sources of his problem.....However, I will say it again, "I have yet to see a scenario in which the computer sees sync but unable to browse.".....Seriously, in all the years of working tech side, if a cpu saw a sync, it was able to browse, minus a firewall or end user issue, but those were generally known issues....Meaning, the end user knew they added it etc. But for a scenario, ie, it was working fine yestarday, today though I see sync but no browse....and I haven't changed anything on my end.....I have never seen one of those.....thanks azuresky for offering clarification, others can take an example from that. That was my point, we post here because we have concerns, and NO ONE wants those concerns just dismissed out of hand....If you have a point to dismissal, great, lets hear it, and you might sway us to your point of view......However, some are not taking the time to sway, just saying, 'your an idiot'...follow?
Originally posted by ludshed
reply to post by pointr97
I concur. But without hearing any details from op it's pointless. If he'd told us I'm on a cable companies dhcp or I'm on an old pots system we could narrow it down. But there is no point in speculating otherwise.
If my aunt had a penis, she'd be my uncle. She doesn't so it's not worth debating over.
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
reply to post by princeguy
My friend works for a major internet provider in Europe. His job basically is to monitor usage over a large urban area. The provider he works for has some large corporate clients, they pay a lot of money to be guaranteed that their internet access will never drop bellow certain speeds. At certain peak times, when a lot of people are online in the area he monitors, the overall usage draws the speed down toward the lines that the provider has guaranteed to its high paying clients it won't go below. My friends job is to watch when this is going to happen, and when it does he cuts off certain sectors in his area for periods of time, these sectors obviously contain just normal household clients. This ensures that the overall internet speed never reaches critical levels. He cuts off internet access to areas for periods ranging from 30 mins to 3hrs or more.
Originally posted by pointr97
reply to post by AzureSky
nice way of responding, but if the DSLAM went down, they wouldn't have had connectivity, the RG would have been unable to sync. You trivialized it that it is a common issue....You know though, I have never had connectivity on my system and not been able to browse. Meaning, I have never looked at my system, seen green but not able to pull a single webpage....If the gateway was receiving signal, and my systems are registering that signal, then I was able to browse...
He is saying, that he saw that signal, it was registered by his computer, but nothing was there.......and yet no one actually asked any probing questions.....sad.....fine conspiracy theorist you all are......what, if it isn't your theory it isn't worth it....
The issue descibed is actually of some concern to me, and would have liked to know more during the issue......He had sync down the line, but there was no content......doesn't scream out to anyone else?edit on 18-12-2011 by pointr97 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by princeguy
Originally posted by unworldly
You feel this is a conspiracy... why, exactly?
No one's internet connection has 100% uptime. Momentary hiccups in connectivity are normal--regardless of your connection type or particular ISP.
Dont be *icks! I am a smart guy, I know that people have internet problems from time to time.
Let me repeat. My internet connections was just fine!
The internet was not available.
I have Never experienced this.
I am just looking to see if it was a widespread thing or something local.