Ron Paul Shocker, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 33 times


reply posted on 16-12-2011 @ 07:59 AM by kellynap43
reply to post by haarvik



Then he chased off any chance of winning with his “wacky” rant on foreign policy.

Don’t get me wrong. If he is the GOP nominee, I will support him. However, he needs to move a little more to the right. Isolationism and singing kumbaya is all fun and swell, but with today, US interests are not just in the western hemisphere, but every where around the globe. It would do him well to understand that.


reply posted on 16-12-2011 @ 08:07 AM by MegaMind
reply to post by kellynap43



Paul knows what anyone who has been paying attention knows. WAR is coming!

Specifically war with Syria and Iran. What do you think our economy will be like when gas is $6.00 a gallon?

Paul is right we simply CANNOT AFFORD to keep going to war and colonizing the middle east and the rest of the planet.

Our foreign policy is anything but in the best interest of the America. It may be in the interest of defense contractors and major oil companies but it is not in OUR best interest.

This idea that we need a "hawkish" foreign policy is a scam. Do you know who sets our foreign policy agenda?

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) that's who

Read their quarterly publication - I have - I assure you they SET OUR AGENDA!

This is our current Secretary of State ....



I would like Ron Paul to be elected so he can tell the CFR to stuff it!
edit on 16-12-2011 by MegaMind because: (no reason given)
edit on 16-12-2011 by MegaMind because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-12-2011 @ 08:58 AM by kellynap43
reply to post by MegaMind



And if Iran builds a nuclear weapon, and bombs Israel, (like they said they would) do you not think that will raise Gas prices to 9 dollars a gallon? And lose a country, millions of people, and allie, and stability for the long term in the middle east?

There is enough oil in the Gulf, Alaska, Canada and North Dakota for this country to be less dependent on what the Middle East provides.

I will quote Alfred from Batman.lol

Alfred Pennyworth: "Well, because he thought it was good sport. Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn. "

Please note, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, cannot be reasoned with. It would do Ron Paul and his supports well to remember that.



reply posted on 16-12-2011 @ 09:42 AM by Battleline
reply to post by haarvik

Question:why after Ron Paul said he would not run on the third party ticket did he change his mind here recently and say the option is open or something to that effect?


reply posted on 16-12-2011 @ 10:26 AM by haarvik
reply to post by Battleline



I never heard him say he would never run that way. I heard him say it's not likely.
Personally, I think he is running under the Repub ticket to garner support that he would never get as an independent. Losing the primary would open the door for him to run independent and be able to capture the vote from all sides.

That of course is purely speculation on my part, but it does make sense.


reply posted on 16-12-2011 @ 10:36 AM by Battleline
reply to post by haarvik

When asked by a reporter," would Paul consider a third party run " he answered "no",when asked why,Paul said "because I don't want to and I think that is enough",sorry, I wish i had a source to refer you to.Any way my point is if Paul or Newt go to the independant party that would split the vote makeing it easy for Obama.In knowing this, why would either consider doing this knowing the out come?


reply posted on 16-12-2011 @ 10:45 AM by MegaMind
Originally posted by DocEmrick
reply to
post by MegaMind



You need a new Sarcasm Detector.


Sarcasm is hard to detect when there is no audio. If I knew you better I might have known. But for all I knew you were a looney.




reply posted on 16-12-2011 @ 10:51 AM by MegaMind
reply to post by kellynap43



Neither can the little gargoyle in North Korea be reasoned with - should we start a war with him too?

Also I think there is a significant deterrent to keep Iran from attacking Israel with nukes - about 80 to 200 deterrents according to this wiki ...

nations with nukes

Pakistan has nukes maybe we should start a war with them as well .... oh wait!




edit on 16-12-2011 by MegaMind because: (no reason given)
edit on 16-12-2011 by MegaMind because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-12-2011 @ 11:07 AM by KingArthur
Ron Pauls Life from his wife.



So the American Dream came true for a boy who delivered newspapers, a teen-ager who mowed lawns, delivered milk, delivered furniture, delivered laundry, and delivered mail, and for a man who then delivered babies. Now that dream continues with a man who is trying to deliver the message that freedom works and that true patriotism must not grow weak in the hearts of Americans, so that we can hang on to our Republic, for which the Founders gave their last, full measure of devotion.





reply posted on 16-12-2011 @ 12:04 PM by kellynap43
reply to post by MegaMind



The gargoyle doesnt hold on the most importand trade routes in the world or one of the largest oil reserves. FYI

Not sure where Pakistan came from .
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^