Pakistan says U.S. drones in its air space will be shot down

page: 20
41
<< 17  18  19   >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 24 2011 @ 11:01 AM
link   
reply to post by gladtobehere
 


David Headley was an INFORMANT. Not a "secret agent".

Good god. PLEASE do you research.




posted on Dec, 24 2011 @ 11:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by gladtobehere
 


David Headley was an INFORMANT. Not a "secret agent".

Good god. PLEASE do you research.



It seems you may have neglected to do your own research, some Indian analysts have speculated that David Headley was a CIA Double agent within LeT.

I'm not claiming this to be fact, but you seem so confident of your statement that I'm curious how you came to this conclusion. I'm not trying to cause trouble, I'm only looking for a clarification.

Thanks in advance


BTW I take no offense in being proven wrong, so if you can enlighten me on this, it would be much appreciated.



posted on Dec, 24 2011 @ 05:19 PM
link   
reply to post by projectvxn
 

Yes of-course.

Would also like to add that the US Government never lies and everything they say should be believed unconditionally.



posted on Dec, 24 2011 @ 05:57 PM
link   
Here is a very interesting video on David Colman Headley;



Apparently Headley is classified as a harlequin because he has one perfect brown eye and one perfect blue. Usually people have unmatched eyes apparently have a slight blemish in colour according to his uncle,

Furthermore, Headley was at one time a major drug dealer but was let off with a small jail sentence when finally caught.



posted on Dec, 25 2011 @ 10:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
 


They "speculated" and people here take it as "fact".

I don't.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 05:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by RARARAsputin
reply to post by buster2010
 


They knowingly harbor our enemy and will not allow us to engage our enemy


Our enemy? Are you really sure of this? Why is it when these countries ask us of proof of our allegations we fail to do so.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 05:24 PM
link   
Things are going so fast right now. Things are definitely heating up



posted on Dec, 29 2011 @ 05:08 PM
link   
reply to post by buster2010
 


Well personally I am against the evil work of religious extremists, so yea I call them an enemy. Are globalist governments any better? No but there is a time and a place to fight every enemy



posted on Dec, 29 2011 @ 08:02 PM
link   
reply to post by projectvxn
 


I don't blame you for questioning their speculations.

Can it factually be proven that he wasn't an operative?



posted on Dec, 29 2011 @ 08:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by RARARAsputin
reply to post by buster2010
 


Well personally I am against the evil work of religious extremists, so yea I call them an enemy. Are globalist governments any better? No but there is a time and a place to fight every enemy


If there is no proof then how do you know they are our enemy? So just because someone says they are our enemy so that gives us the right to invade nations? That's just crazy.



posted on Dec, 29 2011 @ 09:47 PM
link   
reply to post by buster2010
 


Well who's to say the world isnt made of pudding?



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 06:30 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 06:35 AM
link   
edit on 11-5-2012 by Unaccountable because: repeat



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 06:38 AM
link   
reply to post by milkyway12
 


By god, I hope the military doesn't take advice from you because nothing you say here makes sense to me. I respect that you have your opinion but you should think about this a little more.

We, the U.S, have no right to be in Pakistan and our involvement there is only aggravating the "terrorist" threat. We need to bring our troops home and if that means electing Ron Paul, then so be it. It has to be done. Period.





top topics
 
41
<< 17  18  19   >>

log in

join