It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by arpgme
Oh, right. You want a specific answer.
Latin, obviously. We fought two world wars to avoid having to learn German. Have you forgotten?
But our language comes from German not Latin.
Anyway I think English above Latin I don't want to walk around sounding like I'm naming plants or something.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by steveknows
But our language comes from German not Latin.
Not really. The Teutonic roots of English are also the roots of modern German. English is not descended from German any more than humans are descended from chimps; in both cases, the related modern forms are drawn from extinct common ancestors.
I believe English borrows more from Latin than from any other language. Latin entered the English language twice: first with the Roman conquest, when it mingled with the Celtic tongues of the early Britons, then with the Norman conquest, when it mixed with Anglo-Saxon, which had already absorbed much from its Celtic precursors.
Besides, I think the OP is trying to impose an either/or. Latin or German is the choice. He doesn’t want any other suggestions.
Anyway I think English above Latin I don't want to walk around sounding like I'm naming plants or something.
De gustibus non est disputandum.
edit on 6/12/11 by Astyanax because: of illiteracy.
Suppose a one world language was made, would it be best to use Latin or German for such a language?