It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Sen. Claire McCaskill, a democratic representative from the state of Missouri, has asked the Department of Health and Human Services to look into the White House’s recent deal inked between the Obama administration and Siga Technologies Inc, the manufacturer of a smallpox pill that is coincidently owned by a major campaign donor and crony of the commander-in-chief.
The president’s relationship with controlling shareholder Ronald O Perelman has raised eyebrows, but it has also been divulged that
When Siga complained that contracting specialists at the Department of Health and Human Services were resisting the company's financial demands, senior officials replaced the government's lead negotiator for the deal, interviews and documents show.
When Siga was in danger of losing its grip on the contract a year ago, the officials blocked other firms from competing.
Siga was awarded the final contract in May through a "sole-source" procurement in which it was the only company asked to submit a proposal. The contract calls for Siga to deliver 1.7 million doses of the drug for the nation's biodefense stockpile. The price of approximately $255 per dose is well above what the government's specialists had earlier said was reasonable, according to internal documents and interviews.
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
RT is really reaching for everything they can to attack the office of the US president.
If this is the best they can do, all I can say is
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman
Yeah, I think the Russians are afraid that the US may have an effective treatment/vaccine for their weaponized smallpox.
I think there is far more going here than what you are reading on the surface.
Whether there was financial manipulation, corruption or scandal here or not will be sorted out eventually.
But in a war, biodefenses could be critical to our survival.
Can you really put a price tag on that?
Food for thought.
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman
Scandal and corruption are the norm in our government, so it wouldn't surprise me, the deeper elements of this story and the actual implications, and urgency are far more alarming and compelling to me.
Deterrent is one thing, making your enemy's weapons ineffective is another.
Originally posted by -W1LL
the U.s was the first to weaponize smallpox just ask the native Americans!
one more brick in the wall for the dirty corrupt 1% but I am sure its all in our best interest for the Gov. to spend our tax dollars this way,,, after all its for our protection...right...
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman
Effective defenses against ICBM attacks, and effective biodefenses can give an amazing advantage to one side.
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
We don't know if it will work, but apparently someone does.
Siga's drug, an antiviral pill called ST-246, would be used to treat people who were diagnosed with smallpox too late for the vaccine to help. Yet the new drug cannot be tested for effectiveness in people because of ethical constraints — and no one knows whether animal testing could prove it would work in humans.
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman
No one in the private sector could possibly know.