It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sniper068
Eddie999
How old are you 12 ? Have you read any history ? europe exists because of the US. We have bailed you out of 2 world wars, is that your idea of doing just find? Dont hold your breathe, The US is here to stay.
Look at how many poor souls have perished in europe, look at the wars, loss of life, all the barbaric murdering leaders your nations have produced.
Ungrateful Hipocrits
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Judging by Eddys avatar, I think i understand why hed love to see the US collapse.
Eddy, seriously. Even minus the collapse of the USSR and eastern Europe, anyone with an ounce of reality knows the communism is a pipe dream that simply cannot work effectively. It runs counter to human nature, the laws of nature, and such.
Id seriously consider some other political philosphy. I personaly favor total and complete anarchy (also a pipe dream, but alot more productive one as far as Im concerned.)
Originally posted by taibunsuu
Originally posted by looking4clues
Originally posted by taibunsuu
Yes but how to define terrorist.
Terrorist = Angry Muslim
How about the Unabomber? He was a terrorist.
Those Irish army fellows? Seem pretty terrorist to me. Sure they're not Muslim, but they seem to have a penchant for blowing up innocents.
What about angry Christians setting off bombs at abortion clinics? Are those guys terrorists too?
Terrorist is an underdog fighting an establishment, usually by blowing up innocent people to make their case noticed. Whether his actions are right or wrong is defined by your alignment and whether you think his case is valid enough for people to be murdered.
Originally posted by sniper068
Eddie999
How old are you 12 ? Have you read any history ? Europe exists because of the US. We have bailed you out of 2 world wars, is that your idea of doing just find? Don't hold your breathe, The US is here to stay.
Look at how many poor souls have perished in Europe, look at the wars, loss of life, all the barbaric murdering leaders your nations have produced.
Ungrateful Hypocrites
Originally posted by looking4clues
Originally posted by taibunsuu
Originally posted by looking4clues
Originally posted by taibunsuu
Yes but how to define terrorist.
Terrorist = Angry Muslim
How about the Unabomber? He was a terrorist.
Those Irish army fellows? Seem pretty terrorist to me. Sure they're not Muslim, but they seem to have a penchant for blowing up innocents.
What about angry Christians setting off bombs at abortion clinics? Are those guys terrorists too?
Terrorist is an underdog fighting an establishment, usually by blowing up innocent people to make their case noticed. Whether his actions are right or wrong is defined by your alignment and whether you think his case is valid enough for people to be murdered.
LOL Ted Kaczinski? Irrevelant today!
LOL IRA, Irrevelant Today!
LOL Abortion Clinic bomber. Irrevelant Today!
Yet Today, the time you cannot face directly, Islame is the purveyor or World Wide Terror, with a lack of moral character, and intentionally targeting and murdering innocent children. You fight for their right to kill. and you use anceint history as your justification. You are no better than Osama Bin Laden.
If the Arab world is so great and Islamic rule is too, then why are millions of Muslims fleeing the Middle East? Perhaps building their forces for world domination? haha... Passive Invasion!!!
Originally posted by Eddie999
Originally posted by sniper068
Eddie999
How old are you 12 ? Have you read any history ? Europe exists because of the US. We have bailed you out of 2 world wars, is that your idea of doing just find? Don't hold your breathe, The US is here to stay.
Look at how many poor souls have perished in Europe, look at the wars, loss of life, all the barbaric murdering leaders your nations have produced.
Ungrateful Hypocrites
Funny how when most historians debate whether the US had any real impact on the outcome of WW1 you are so certain that they did. As for WW2, the Soviet Union was the nation that won that war, and at a cost of over 20 000 000 lives.
As for barbaric murdering leaders, how many Native Americans, Mexicans and other indigenous peoples did you Americans wipe out with your fascist Christian concept of manifest destiny? How many innocents died in Hiroshima and Nagaski? How many millions has the US army killed in Central and South America and South Est Asia since the end of WW2.
I think America has been ruled by some of the most barbaric and murdering people in history actually.
(I corrected your multitude of spelling errors as well)
Originally posted by Eddie999
Originally posted by sniper068
Eddie999
How old are you 12 ? Have you read any history ? Europe exists because of the US. We have bailed you out of 2 world wars, is that your idea of doing just find? Don't hold your breathe, The US is here to stay.
Look at how many poor souls have perished in Europe, look at the wars, loss of life, all the barbaric murdering leaders your nations have produced.
Ungrateful Hypocrites
Funny how when most historians debate whether the US had any real impact on the outcome of WW1 you are so certain that they did. As for WW2, the Soviet Union was the nation that won that war, and at a cost of over 20 000 000 lives.
As for barbaric murdering leaders, how many Native Americans, Mexicans and other indigenous peoples did you Americans wipe out with your fascist Christian concept of manifest destiny? How many innocents died in Hiroshima and Nagaski? How many millions has the US army killed in Central and South America and South Est Asia since the end of WW2.
I think America has been ruled by some of the most barbaric and murdering people in history actually.
(I corrected your multitude of spelling errors as well)
Originally posted by taibunsuu
Terrorist is an underdog fighting an establishment, usually by blowing up innocent people to make their case noticed. Whether his actions are right or wrong is defined by your alignment and whether you think his case is valid enough for people to be murdered.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Originally posted by taibunsuu
Terrorist is an underdog fighting an establishment, usually by blowing up innocent people to make their case noticed. Whether his actions are right or wrong is defined by your alignment and whether you think his case is valid enough for people to be murdered.
A terrorist is someone who uses acts of terror to terrorize people into getting what they want. People that justify attacks on civilians.
Someone the is "fighting an establishment" and is the underdog does not always resort to such inhuman tactics. Many people have fought as underdogs in a conflict without attacking women and children.
There has been many a freedom fighter that never used acts of terror. But there has never been a terrorist that did not use terror.
blowing up innocent people to make their case noticed does not make you a freedom fighter it makes you a terrorist plain and simple. If they were real freedom fighters they would attack military targets.
Originally posted by taibunsuu
I'm not justifying terrorism.
Everything you see happening in Iraq happened nearly identically in Afghanistan.
If you don't believe that read the books on this site:
www.sovietsdefeatinafghanistan.com...
They are free and written by the ISI officer in charge of supplying and providing US-provided Intel to the Arabs fighting in Afghanistan agains the Soviets, including UBL.
Jihadis in Iraq are now terrorists. Jihadis in Afghanistan were admired for their tenacity and called freedom fighters by the President of the US.
This is fact that cannot by altered by emotion. Stating this fact is not displaying approval of terrorism.
Originally posted by taibunsuu
The way people are conditioned to the point where they can kill children is similiar to the way people are conditioned to the point where they can kill, period.
1. They are convinced the 'enemy' is inhuman.
2. The killer is mentally enabled to relieve themselves of responsibility for their actions. "Under orders." "For the greater good."
Social and cultural conditions in which the legitimization of murder exist to some degree in all societies. Look at the psychological disassociation of guilt and responsibility between the actions of a group and the members of the group. That's where the conditions for legitimization of murder start.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Originally posted by taibunsuu
Majority of German soldiers died fighting the Russians. German defeats at Stalingrad and Kursk were the biggest German defeats until Berlin fell. Eastern front was Hitler's biggest mistake ever. Many Germans felt that the Western front was purposefully weaker than the Eastern. Once it was obvious they were losing the war they wanted the Allies to have as much as Germany as possible. If you read about what happened to Berlin after it was captured you'll know why.
Not to argue with Russias effect on WW2 but Germany didnt exactly roll out the red carpet for the allies on the western front.
What countires did Russia Liberate besides here own from German rule? I think if America wasnt there Russia would not have stopped at Germany but they would have keep rolling through the rest of Europe and they wouldnt have been liberating anyone.
Hitler and Stalin had already sliced up all the pieces of the pie of Europe during their Non-Aggression Pact
Germany was giving the Soviets the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania). Poland was also to be divided between the two - along the Narew, Vistula, and San rivers
[edit on 5-9-2004 by ShadowXIX]
Originally posted by verfed
And once war comes to American shores EVERYONE will support the war even if heads are falling in their front yard. When war gets closer Americans won't want to stop the war just because they can finally see it with their own eyes. When war is that close you have to fight or you die.