It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How come some of the chemtrials starts and stops and make broken lines in the sy? If they are 'normal contrails' did they switch of the engine in mid flight?????
Originally posted by pavelivanov22
reply to post by PlausibleDeniability
Only thing is i don't live near a airpot. and there are rarely any planes.
Not many could keep that secret knowing they are poisoning thier own family and friends (not possible)
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by pavelivanov22
Living near an airport (or not near an airport) is irrelevant.
Only thing is i don't live near a airpot. and there are rarely any planes.
Contrails form at high altitudes only. Airplanes are at low altitudes when departing or arriving.
And fog is only "poisonous" in bad Hollywood movies.
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by pavelivanov22
Not again......
Hey, here's a novel idea! Why not take a bit of time and review this Forum, and just a couple of the threads??
Or, how about spending a few hours and self-educating here:
Contrail Science
Contrails, on Wikipedia. Of course, some don't "like" Wiki, but here it is anyway
ATS thread from 2008: "Real Contrail Science, why they persist and why they spread out and why they are not chemtrails"
(PS...the iPhone 4, huh? Looks like it takes decent photos, for a telephone! LOL)
edit on Wed 16 November 2011 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by juleol
reply to post by pavelivanov22
One thing i find interesting is how 90% of those "chemtrail" pictures are when sun is close to horizon.
Originally posted by Gmoneycricket
Tick Tock
No Contrail Pictures from Air Force One yet!
Contrails from Presidential Planes must be fantasy.
not all contrails you see are contrails....
...actually watch this, and learn....
....That’s quite straightforward right? Barium found at 68.8 µg/L. That’s 68.8 parts per billion. Now listen to the audio at that precise point (also transcribed on the KSLA web site):
“The results: a high level of barium, 6.8 parts per million (ppm), more than three times the toxic level set by the EPA”.
Immediately you can see something is wrong here. it’s 68.8, not 6.8, and it’s not parts per million, it’s parts per billion. So it’s actually 0.0688 parts per million.
And what of “three times the toxic level set by the EPA”? They are referring to the EPA Limits, as quoted by the CDC:
“The EPA has set a limit of 2.0 milligrams of barium per liter of drinking water (2.0 mg/L), which is the same as 2 ppm [parts per million].”
So the EPA limit is 2 ppm (2000 µg/L), and the tests actually found 0.0688 ppm (68.8 µg/L), just 3.4% of the allowable limit.
ETA: here is some more stuff for your simple mind to chew on:
www.worldaffairsbrief.com...
www.wanttoknow.info...
www.detailshere.com...
answers.yahoo.com...
globalskywatch.com...
www.willthomas.net...