stoneskull
theron dunn , you are so confused i think you are psychotic.
You are making things up in your head based on preconceived notions. You went off on this trip about nothing and are still tripping. I wasn't
slandering Albert Pike
I was, wasn't I? I am confused now-
Oh, I just read the deffinition- nope. No one has slandered
Bro. Pike except the pro-masons.
“”#2 A false and malicious statement or report about someone “”
The pro-masons do this all the time about
Pike. Most of what they post about him is
false. Malicious? Probably not- the rest
of masonry has discounted or discredited him already. His supporters are like the Ostrich with his head in the sand- wondering what that pain in his
tail feathers is. They don't want to look for fear it might be a lion. Who knows, probably just a strange Ostrich?
theron
The post has been deleted, as have the offending images that started the discussion in the first place.
Images? What images?
Way to go THERON! Don't deny- just delete!! Classic masonry at its insidious best
theron
Or, more accurately, a ROUGH AND RUGGED ROAD, maintaining his honor and integrity, courage and strength, Justice and Charity throughout his life.
Hardly the demon you tried to conjure. Often when you do the right thing you will be criticized by small minds... as a mason, I see this constantly.
About Sam Houston- get real. Three wives, two abandoned H-E-L l o
theron
Persecution complex personified? Poor guy,
theron, I know” the road less traveled,” am I right?
LTD
“John Fowles's celebrated cult novel “
“reality and fantasy are deliberately confused by staged deaths, erotic encounters, and terrifying violence “
“exploration of love, betrayal and accountability”
From what you've been posting this seems appropriate. I have been wrong-
Probably read it in the early 70's along with the
French Lt's/ Woman.
I liked him O.K., not terribly inspirational unless you seek justification for cults and things like that- to each their own I guess.
After you become a mason, not before, you might want to read “
The Story of O.” This is the ultimate denigration of woman as an object. I read
it, threw it in the trash, burned it and took a shower. I still felt dirty. It is considered a classic.
Quote by others:
“this work is worthy to stand beside the best writings of the Marquis de Sade “
At that time I was given
One Dimensional
Man by an educator I much admired.
I hated the book. I read it again after at least a year and still hated it.
This is the main reason I so seldom use “quotes” and those superb “sayings” others like so well. I got rid of me
quotable quotes and all
similar books after reading this the first time. The seond time- (I hated it)
Want to get really deep? Look into this book. You will not like it. (i am not wrong about this)