It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A group of Pakistanis met in Islamabad late last month to discuss the impact of U.S. drone strikes in their communities. One of the attendees was a 16-year-old boy named Tariq Aziz, who had volunteered to learn photography to begin documenting drone strikes near his home. Within 72 hours of the meeting, Aziz was killed in a U.S. drone strike. His 12-year-old cousin was also killed in the Oct. 31 attack.
But more than that, the very fact that I personally was able to meet them in an open, public meeting in Islamabad, I question as to whether the CIA is really attempting to identify people before they kill them, because if this person was a militant, they could well have met them in Islamabad, as did hundreds of other people. And at the press conference, there were—I counted 23 cameras. At the jirga, there were a dozen cameras. There are thousands of people in the streets of Islamabad. It would have been so easy for the CIA, the ISI, to come question these kids, to have taken them aside, even put them in jail or interrogated them, send them to Guantánamo. But instead they chose to kill them.
I can't imagine how disturbing it would be living in an area with regular drone strikes.
The next day, the jirga lasted several hours. I had a translator, but the gist of each man’s speech was clear. American drones would circle their homes all day before unleashing Hellfire missiles, often in the dark hours between midnight and dawn. Death lurked everywhere around them.
www.nytimes.com...
The pilots of these drones never get to see the mangled bodies of the children they kill.
Originally posted by pthena
There is a strong implication that this was an intentional targeted killing by the CIA of Tariq Aziz and his 12 year old cousin while traveling. Notice "while traveling", that means in the open, easily identifiable by cameras on the drone. Not "collateral damage" of a bystander in a militant compound.
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
Originally posted by pthena
There is a strong implication that this was an intentional targeted killing by the CIA of Tariq Aziz and his 12 year old cousin while traveling. Notice "while traveling", that means in the open, easily identifiable by cameras on the drone. Not "collateral damage" of a bystander in a militant compound.
Individuals are not easily identifiable from altitude. They are very hard to identify, especially if they are traveling in a closed vehicle. If the attack takes place "in the dark hours between midnight and dawn," the target is just a man-shaped blob.
Originally posted by Expat888
when they can read a newspaper at night from spy satellites they damn sure can i.d people walking on the ground in the open from a drone.
All the little humans are being breed to be mindless killers if they are so inclined to video games .
Military propaganda video game Halo 3 dominates marketOct. 23 2009
Halo 3 is a dream recruiting tool for the military, a perfect amalgam of propaganda and entertainment that highlights all of the unrealistic, hyper-machismo badassery of Hollywood-style war, while completely whitewashing the moral relativism of real-world conflicts.
. . .
Microsoft made $170 million on the first day of Halo 3’s release. It estimated 1 million players were online within 20 hours of the release, and Halo 3 has now sold more copies than the Harry Potter video game series. The Army has spent over a million dollars to sponsor the game precisely because they want access to that huge pool of bodies just waiting to be tossed into conflict zones.