It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
By god, the mans right.
We are being fought to a stalemate in iraq after 3-4 years..but russia.. pfft... we'll have them in 12 months
Out of interest though, how does an invading army who has to SHIP and FLY all its supplies from home, have an advatge over the DEFENDING country in food?
pull the other one mate!
[edit on 18-10-2006 by Agit8dChop]
Princeofpeace
Umm..if youve been reading, i think the board has gone to the premise of a conventional war between the 2 because we all know nuclear is a moot point. Ok?
en.wikipedia.org...
The doctrine assumes that each side has enough weaponry to destroy the other side and that either side, if attacked FOR ANY REASON by the other, would retaliate with equal or greater force. The expected result is an immediate escalation resulting in both combatants' total and assured destruction. It is now generally assumed that the nuclear fallout or nuclear winter resulting from a large scale nuclear war would bring about worldwide devastation, though this was not a critical assumption to the theory of MAD.
Originally posted by princeofpeace
Hmmm...Russia left Afghanistan with its tail between its legs...we have done a LOT more there than Russia ever did in that country. And Iraq is not Chechnya. Russia cant even squash an extremely poor break away republic like Chechnya yet you are going to say because we havent changed the minds of the insurgents in Iraq then Russia could beat the US? Unbelievable. Flawed logic my friend...very flawed.
Originally posted by Shamanator
Russias teeth are rusty and have fallen out lets face it Russia is practicly still using world war 2 technology In a real war against any western country not just America they would lose and lose fast.
Originally posted by Shamanator
Certainly America would defeat Russia with ease the Russian threat is gone. I understand Russians are bitter about the third world country they have become trying to keep up with American technologicly and failing so utterly. They now resort to making up weapons (scalar, plasma stealth, etc) but it won't change reality.
Originally posted by Shamanator
As for Russia's Nuclear threat would those badly kept missiles even leave their silos I for one have my doubts. If they even did given russian electronics would they even hit the right continent ? Maybe more than likely they wouldn't. If they did would they detonate after so long again doubtfull given Russian engineering.
Originally posted by Shamanator
The fact Russia's Army are mere conscripts and still using battered old ak47's when nearly every other country has a Professional well trained army with the latest equipment.
Originally posted by Shamanator
All in all Russia's huge that is perhaps the only advantage and protection they have it's really no contest America would win and win big.
Originally posted by princeofpeace
Yeah but being armed with a million rifles isnt the same as being armed with one hundred thousand machine guns.
While Russia's technology may not be WW2, it is much farther behind than the US which is using its military hardware constantly and it is always being tweaked to be the best possible........state of the art. And this is what they let us see.
Originally posted by magicmushroom
Prince and Sham, You are both absolutely clueless and one wonders where you get your imformation from, maybe you should do some real unbiased research before you post. Towards the end of ww2 leaders in the west were genuinly concerened that Stalin might not stop in Germany but might continue right on to the Atlantic. Russia at this time had 12.5 Million men and women under arms, thats why the bombs were dropped on Japan, the Japs were already beaten, but the object of the bomb was does it work and to send a clear message to Stalin that any attempts to move westward would be met with a similar fate. Their current force numbers are not far behind the US and they have 20million in reserve, also Russia hads the benefit of not having its forces spread all over the world as America does.
Shamanator
Russias teeth are rusty and have fallen out lets face it Russia is practicly still using world war 2 technology In a real war against any western country not just America they would lose and lose fast.
Originally posted by princeofpeace
Exactly as i have been saying all along...people read!!! The war between Russia and the US (if nukes are used) would produce NO WINNER!!! So why even have this thread in the first place??????
Originally posted by princeofpeace
There is nothing to debate unless you want to theorize a CONVENTIONAL war between the 2. Russia has outdated equipment and they cannot even afford to put fuel into everything they do have. How long would they fight before running out of gas? How are they going to get all their equipment over here to fight us anyway? They do not have the resources to launch any type of conventional attack on the US.
If however you put the nuclear issue aside and look at who would win in a conventional war, then you have a thread worthy of debate. Comprende?