 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 02:03 PM by American Mad Man
|
In nuclear war both sides are destroyed.
In a conventional war, the US has the advantage.
First off, the US, as was stated before, basically has Russia surrounded.
The US would have the initiative, and would be on the offensive, so Russias industrial system would be much more devastated then the USs - if they
were even touched at all.
The US also has THE MOST IMPORTANT ADVANTAGE IN WAR. That my friends, is LOGISTICS. The US can get what it wants where it wants faster and on a larger
scale then anyone else. We can support forward fighting better then anyone else.
As far as comparing the forces....
NAVY - Clear advantage to the US. Supercarrier battle groups, the quitest subs and more of them, the best surface fleet. That would be the greatest US
advantage.
Air War - slight advantage to the US. The US fighter fleet is a bit long in the tooth but has much better avionics and is much better maintained.
Ground war - slight advantage to the Russians. They outnumber the US and would be fighting for their own soil - a clear psychological edge. The US has
better tanks, but the Russians have more to throw at the US. I do believe though that their advantage on the ground would be cancelled by the US
advantage in the air.
OUTCOME:
Stalemate. The US could probably force the Russians boarders back a bit, but at great cost. The overall outtcome would be lots of death and little
gain for either side.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 02:13 PM by Hellraiser
|
Originally posted by American Mad Man
In nuclear war both sides are destroyed.
In a conventional war, the US has the advantage.
First off, the US, as was stated before, basically has Russia surrounded.
o no few crappy bases with 4 f16's
The US would have the initiative, and would be on the offensive, so Russias industrial system would be much more devastated then the USs - if they
were even touched at all.
russia has a good force of cruise missile/long range missile carrier forces to cripple you
The US also has THE MOST IMPORTANT ADVANTAGE IN WAR. That my friends, is LOGISTICS. The US can get what it wants where it wants faster and on a larger
scale then anyone else. We can support forward fighting better then anyone else.
not on russian soil you dont, you will end up like hitler and napoleon
As far as comparing the forces....
NAVY - Clear advantage to the US. Supercarrier battle groups, the quitest subs and more of them, the best surface fleet. That would be the greatest US
advantage.
russia will destroy these poor battle groups with their anti-shipping forces, ie the subs and naval aviation like tu-22m3 etc.., us battle groups
would sink pretty fast, just expensive toys for invading undefended #holes
Air War - slight advantage to the US. The US fighter fleet is a bit long in the tooth but has much better avionics and is much better maintained.
air war over russia is impossible, it is the most heavily defended nation with interceptors and actual AD network, you would be shot out from the
skies
The US has better tanks, but the Russians have more to throw at the US. I do believe though that their advantage on the ground would be cancelled by
the US advantage in the air.
BS, better tanks my ass, t80 series have better protection then your incumbered tractor tank which can get destroyed by simple 40 year old rpgs on
the sides, also air advantage my ass, your awacs would dissapear from the earth by long range anti-awac missiles and aircraft like mig-31, and without
awacs amer aircraft are pretty useless, migs-31 and other russian aircraft can even act without ground control, can also be uplinked..
OUTCOME:
us navy battle groups sinked, russia nukes nato on the first week, world is wasteland 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 03:32 PM by American Mad Man
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 04:49 PM by Asia Minor
|
Why do you pro-americans and (You can call them zionists can you) Zionist people keep speaking foolish. If the U.S. and USSR went at it the whole
world not just both nations would be uninhabitable. I
[edit on 11-3-2005 by Asia Minor]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 04:53 PM by Hellraiser
|
No, if usa tries to invade russia usa is dead, same goes with russia, its impossible to invade these nations..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 05:06 PM by SiberianTiger
|
MiG 29SMT's can take on F-16 blk 60 40 have been built, then theres the MiG 29 M2 which is even more advanced than the SMT it can clearly take on F16
blk 60 AND F-15's of ANY class, so far as I know only 1 MiG 29 has been upgraded/built to M2 standard and 40 MiG 29 SMT's have been built, but if
Rus sees that a war with U.S. will happen we will build 2000 MiG 29 M2's in a matter of 3-4 months. P.S. I believe we have already built our 5th GEN
warplanes but Rus will not announce it until ww3 is just about to start, Russian T-72's have scince 1989 had ERA, Nightvision and thermal imaging
systems plus DU Rounds, this is what Iraq T-55's T-62's and T-72's didn't have thats the main reason why M1A1's won the war. T-80's -T-90 Tank
oh man M1A1,A2 andA3 will be destroyed and we're about to come out with T-95 which will not be the "Black Eagle" as many have speculated but will
be a RADICALY new different tank, soilders SUBS U.S. has more but our AKULA classes are the most quietsts and have WAY more weapons and can go deeper,
thats why U.S. came up with the "SEAWOLF" but don't worry we got somethin coming out towards the end of this (2005) year
[edit on 11-3-2005 by SiberianTiger]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 05:11 PM by Hellraiser
|
Originally posted by SiberianTiger
moronic crap 
all please do not pay attention to this lunatic i saw his posts on ats and he just embarras russians..  , his posts are even too dumb for ats.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 05:15 PM by SiberianTiger
|
Please provide the PROOF what I just posted is a LIE and if ya can't I'm gonna try to do every thing to have you banned FOR YOUR LYING remark
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 05:28 PM by Mr Carburetor
|
As an American I give you great credit for this statement. No matter how the world is viewed at this time............The US and Russia are still the
big boys. IT would be impossible for homeland invasion on either side.
Lets set aside a large piece of land somewhere in the middle and let them duke it out there.
 Carburetor
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 05:28 PM by Hellraiser
|
No, it's just that you live in a delusional world.. look up your posts on ats and read them carefully you biggot, i bet you dont even know
russian  , also i don't care about being banned
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 05:30 PM by Hellraiser
|
Originally posted by Mr Carburetor
As an American I give you great credit for this statement. No matter how the world is viewed at this time............The US and Russia are still the
big boys. IT would be impossible for homeland invasion on either side.

ok, lets agree and close our "conflict" at this statement
[edit on 11-3-2005 by Hellraiser]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 05:39 PM by Mr Carburetor
|
But honestly,.......The US government and the Russian government know the ramifications of war between these two military Super powers and i highly
doubt that they will do anything more than scuffle over a few backing of nations here and there. If the US and Russia went to war, they might as well
put a load of nukes in the planet core, kiss our butts goodbye, and watch the entire planet blow.
Lets just do a rematch of Rocky vs Drago and call it good.
 Carburetor
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 06:58 PM by roflcopter
|
UNITED
STATES
FOR
TEH
WIN!
[edit on 11-3-2005 by roflcopter]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 07:00 PM by Hellraiser
|
thanks for your contribution script kiddie, also you have misspelled "THE" in your attempt at posting.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 07:05 PM by roflcopter
|
DIE U COMMIE BASTARD LOL!
[edit on 11-3-2005 by roflcopter]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 09:17 PM by SiberianTiger
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 09:33 PM by HaroldBlower
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 10:26 PM by Raphael
|
* Current Russian fighters are already on par with America’s best fighter, the F-15. Europe's and Russia's newest class of fighters will surpass
the F-15; they are set to roll off production lines by 2005
* At least three foreign aircraft threaten to surpass the F-15’s performance in the near future: the French Rafale, the Eurofighter 2000 and the
Russian Su-35. Some foreign aircraft are already at parity with the F-15
* Nations are already denying America access to airspace around the globe by obtaining low-cost, but sophisticated, surface-to-air missile
systems
* Highly capable surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems pose a formidable challenge to the F-15’s survivability. Advanced SAM systems, because of
their relatively low cost, are a quick and easy way for countries to modernize their air defense systems
It's a good thing the US already has a fighter which makes the F15, F16, and even F117's look like childs play.. What do they call this vehicle of
the future?
FA/22 Raptor
external image
external image
The F/A-22 provides America with an asymmetric advantage in the air as well as on the ground. These are the primary attributes of America’s premier
21st-century transformational system.
The F/A-22 will not just serve the Air Force; it will serve all surface forces as well. It has been almost 50 years since U.S. ground forces have been
threatened by enemy air attacks; the F/A-22 is the best aircraft available to extend that timeline indefinitely.
Then of course to ensure American air superiority there is the X-35. This aircraft has the manuverabiluty in the air like the FA/22 but it also has
verticle take off and landing capabilities, making it the most versitile and lethal aircraft in the world today. Carrier class ships can hold more
aircraft since they do not need a runway to take off or land. Small areas on the ground can be used as bases since a runway is not necessary. Ground
support is ever more lethal as these aircraft can hover in support of any ground based assault like a helicopter.
X-35
external image
external image
external image
[edit on 11-3-2005 by Raphael]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-3-2005 @ 10:43 PM by Hellraiser
|
Originally posted by Raphael
* Current Russian fighters are already on par with America’s best fighter, the F-15. Europe's and Russia's newest class of fighters will
surpass the F-15; they are set to roll off production lines by 2005
what ,thats why su-27 series were made.. and still surpass all european aircraft along with jsf, only the f15 are on par with it, and f22
outclasses it in many areas like lo tech and computer technology..
* At least three foreign aircraft threaten to surpass the F-15’s performance in the near future: the French Rafale, the Eurofighter 2000 and the
Russian Su-35.
was done lone time ago already, su-35 capability actually surpass above mentioned aircraft and close up there with f22  Some foreign aircraft
are already at parity with the F-15 you got to be kidding me
* Nations are already denying America access to airspace around the globe by obtaining low-cost, but sophisticated, surface-to-air missile
systems
you mean defending themselves from american hegemony
* Highly capable surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems pose a formidable challenge to the F-15’s survivability. Advanced SAM systems, because of
their relatively low cost, are a quick and easy way for countries to modernize their air defense systems well no sh
It's a good thing the US already has a fighter which makes the F15, F16, and even F117's look like childs play.. What do they call this vehicle of
the future?
f15/16 are not childs play and are one of the best aircraft still in the world..
FA/22 Raptor
many equivelents are coming out, we shall see how they will compare with it, i suspect russians will come up with something on par of f22 with the
indians financing and software

[edit on 11-3-2005 by Hellraiser]
edit: also to add, f22 is HEAVELY overrated, with the advances in radar technology its lo-pro tech will be declining in a very short time.. it's
ATG capability is very low too..not to mention it's over the top price
[edit on 11-3-2005 by Hellraiser]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-3-2005 @ 05:39 AM by Black Flag
|
Without placing the conflict in context, it is almost impossible to answer in any meaningful way. It is like asking "how long is a piece of
string?".
Also, unless you exclude nuclear weapons, the answer is bleak and short:
No winners - only losers.
A short answer would be the country being invaded would likely end up the victor. They have more to fight for. Invaders are just "doing
their jobs".
Soldiers follow orders. They utilize their training and weaponry to the best effect. But a man or woman defending their home, their family will
gladly do ANYTHING to win. To survive. No matter how poor the odds.
If America were invaded the initial loses would be huge. But the "ordinary" citizens would fight and resist with anything and everything and in the
end, the invaders would be repelled. The loses would be huge - 10's of millions.
The same would (AND HAS!! More than once!) happen if Russia were invaded.
However....
This doesnt take into account the simple fact that two huge countries seperated by vast oceans cannot conceivably effectively invade each other.
Besides...
For the less than the cost of such a huge and expensive military undertaking, either country could just BUY UP vast areas of undeveloped property as
well as residential, commercial and industrial real estate.
In fact it is going on right now!
Much more effective, if not as exciting.
...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |