It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by mockrock
Pressure is such: If we actually manage to predict one of these staged events before it happens.. Then the penny will drop for the rest of the population! This stuff stays in cyber space.. The internet was seen as a great tool for globalization but is causing problems for them. That's why forums such as this are useful to them... we heard ourselves into a group identified as a conspiracy forum.. away from the mainstream and easy to keep an eye on as its impossible to close your account!
You do not need all the power in the universe to nudge an asteroid, just the budget.. and a fracking plant is incredibly simple.. Earthquakes are not difficult to cause.
The only person who seems to be feeling any pressure is you. Do I understand you correctly? You are hammering away at this because if, contrary to the odds, YU55 does impact the Earth, you will be able to use this thread to "prove" that it was all a staged event? Then, because you have been predicting that it is a staged event, this will somehow cause everyone on Earth to believe that some conspiracy was responsible for it and rise up against the perpetrators? You need to ask yourself: "What if nothing happens? Won't that ruin my credibility? Will I ever be able to open anyone's eyes once I've made such a spectacularly bad prediction?"
As for your belief that an asteroid is easy to nudge: I hope that when the time really does come, your belief is well founded. [/quote
I think you should do some research into conspiracies that turned out to be true.. This not as wild as it may seem.
Originally posted by mockrock
Originally posted by jeichelberg
States that YU55 will not strike Earth...there is more here, including a diagram of the projected path...it will pass within .0022 AU, roughly 300Km from Earth...
neo.jpl.nasa.gov...
NASA not the most trustworthy source ! It's a propaganda machine !
I think you should do some research into conspiracies that turned out to be true.. This not as wild as it may seem.
reuters
Computer models showing the asteroid's path for the next 100 years show there is no chance it will hit Earth during that time, added Yeomans.
"We do not think that it will ever impact the Earth or moon (but) we only have its orbit calculated for the next 100 years," he said.
Previous studies show the asteroid, which is blacker than charcoal, is what is called a C-type asteroid that is likely made of carbon-based materials and some silicate rock
It will be too dim to be seen with the naked eye, however, and it will be moving too fast for viewing by the Hubble Space Telescope.
"The best time to observe it would be in the early evening on November 8 from the East Coast of the United States," Yeomans said. "It is going to be very faint, even at its closest approach. You will need a decent-sized telescope to be able to actually see the object as it flies by."
Originally posted by flexy123
Originally posted by mockrock
Originally posted by jeichelberg
States that YU55 will not strike Earth...there is more here, including a diagram of the projected path...it will pass within .0022 AU, roughly 300Km from Earth...
neo.jpl.nasa.gov...
NASA not the most trustworthy source ! It's a propaganda machine !
A propaganda machine is someone who spreads lies and does fear mongering by distorting the truth.
In other words: You.
The world is waking up.. I have never said a single lie in any of my posts.
Ask me to prove anything I have said and I will, beyond doubt.. Is it a lie that NASA lied about the size of YU55 from the start..? and that if they based the trajectory on an object 175M diameter then (as trajectory was not adjusted with the increase in size to 400M) then that data is incorrect.
How can the size increase have no effect on the projected trajectory? Impossible.
Do you want to see the NASA NEO fact sheet from 2006 (after discovery of YU55) that doesn't even list the 2011 close pass? Yet mentions the one 80 years in the future?
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by mockrock
The world is waking up.. I have never said a single lie in any of my posts.
Perhaps not, but that is about to change:
Ask me to prove anything I have said and I will, beyond doubt.. Is it a lie that NASA lied about the size of YU55 from the start..? and that if they based the trajectory on an object 175M diameter then (as trajectory was not adjusted with the increase in size to 400M) then that data is incorrect.
Yes, it is a complete lie that NASA lied about the size of 2005 YU 55 from the start. When it was discovered, they estimated a range of sizes based on its possible albedo (reflectivity). If it was dark, it was large, if it was shiny, it would be small. This has been explained to you before; an educated guess is not a lie, to characterize it as such is. Subsequent radar measurements have established a better estimate for its size; apparently it is darker than the earlier assumptions. Its size has nothing to do with its trajectory; it is in orbit around the Sun; any object irrespective of size or mass will follow that same "trajectory." This has also been explained to you several times before, so repeating the claim is, in effect, another lie.
How can the size increase have no effect on the projected trajectory? Impossible.
Simply wrong. I suggest you read up on celestial mechanics before declaring something every High School student knows to be "impossible":
en.wikipedia.org...
Do you want to see the NASA NEO fact sheet from 2006 (after discovery of YU55) that doesn't even list the 2011 close pass? Yet mentions the one 80 years in the future?
Why should they have? This is not the closest pass it will make; that will be in another 80 years. We will discuss this topic again at that time.
Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
reply to post by randyvs
It would seem that it takes some new members a while till they separate
fact from fiction..
Since ATS opened the gates to facebook,. Ive noticed a greater number of posters just looking for attention rather than facts..of course it could be just coincidence.
The OP title was the first red flag