posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 04:09 PM
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by FlyingSpaghettiMonster
Yes its minimun damgage... I got a the tube in London every day for nearly 10 years and I am telling you it makes not sense. The trains are almost
empty that time.. Half an hour before and they would have been packed.. So why go to all the trouble and only kill 60 peeps when it could have been
Same on 911 the buildings were not fully occupied.. If you are going to fly planes into buidling you want the buildings full of peeps..
This an exercise in damage restriction not compassionate terrorists
Once again, what's the point? What I think is that perhaps the terrorists were a bit...thick? You assume there's some great intelligence behind this,
but really, they're just fanatical idiots. The WTC attacks were late - they ought to have happened earlier, but the plan was delayed. You also
misunderstand the point of the attacks on 11/9/01. Killing was a desired aim, but the most important thing, and the reason for the targets, was
publicity. It was a stunt, and it succeeded far better than even Osama himself could have hoped for.
As for the London bombings, these were just average UK Muslim Joes - watch their 'martyrdom' videos and it's plain they're trying to act up to the
image of the jihadist, but not quite managing it. You never consider the role of Murphy's Law in life. Plans go wrong, people cock up. The Tavistock
Square bomb was one such unplanned event.
And besides, this all ignores the fact that raising a few scattered questions about a few minute details does not a coherent theory make. Nor does
shifting the goal posts when those small crumbs of supposed evidence are swept away. The 'official' version of events makes more sense, because it's
the simplest, easiest way for the terrorists to get what they want, given the circumstances. On the other hand, it's the most complicated, awkward,
unlikely way for sinister goverment to achieve....what exactly? People on this forum can't even agree on a self-consistent alternate chain of events
and motives, so why should you be credited with respect for such a half-arsed bit of kite-flying?
edit on 8-11-2011 by FlyingSpaghettiMonster