YU55 evidence mounting that it will hit. FEMA test transmission now coincides with a Tsunami alert t

page: 15
31
<< 12  13  14    16  17 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 12:19 AM
link   
YU55 gives us a fly by at the same time as the Mayan Crystal Scull Ceremonies and Journy from Sedona to Los Angeles.
Good Vibes




posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 02:06 AM
link   
reply to post by TheSameAsYou
 


It was an OK example...... until you brought up your dreams of the moon falling. What is it with people thinking they`re psychic.



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 02:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by mockrock
 



Pressure is such: If we actually manage to predict one of these staged events before it happens.. Then the penny will drop for the rest of the population! This stuff stays in cyber space.. The internet was seen as a great tool for globalization but is causing problems for them. That's why forums such as this are useful to them... we heard ourselves into a group identified as a conspiracy forum.. away from the mainstream and easy to keep an eye on as its impossible to close your account!

You do not need all the power in the universe to nudge an asteroid, just the budget.. and a fracking plant is incredibly simple.. Earthquakes are not difficult to cause.


The only person who seems to be feeling any pressure is you. Do I understand you correctly? You are hammering away at this because if, contrary to the odds, YU55 does impact the Earth, you will be able to use this thread to "prove" that it was all a staged event? Then, because you have been predicting that it is a staged event, this will somehow cause everyone on Earth to believe that some conspiracy was responsible for it and rise up against the perpetrators? You need to ask yourself: "What if nothing happens? Won't that ruin my credibility? Will I ever be able to open anyone's eyes once I've made such a spectacularly bad prediction?"

As for your belief that an asteroid is easy to nudge: I hope that when the time really does come, your belief is well founded. [/quote



I think you should do some research into conspiracies that turned out to be true.. This not as wild as it may seem.



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 02:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by mockrock

Originally posted by jeichelberg
States that YU55 will not strike Earth...there is more here, including a diagram of the projected path...it will pass within .0022 AU, roughly 300Km from Earth...

neo.jpl.nasa.gov...


NASA not the most trustworthy source ! It's a propaganda machine !


A propaganda machine is someone who spreads lies and does fear mongering by distorting the truth.
In other words: You.



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 02:36 AM
link   
Sooo he we have another.. "disaster".

Lets say just for instance that everything you're saying is true. The governments and space scientist of the world are covering it up. Preparing "drills" like 9-11 and 7-7. I understand this concept and I understand the pain of being lied to....... but.. If there is a 100% chance the asteroid is going to hit Earth... what does it really matter if they tell or not? It's going to hit anyways. Lets say people die, well people die every day because of natural disasters. Lets say it was about 200 years ago this event was to take place with the lack of technology, there would be no way to really tell of an incoming.

Thing is.. We are apart of a cycle. Everything happens for a reason. People are supposed to live then die. It's the circle of life. Get used to it. Let nature work. Stop being so fearful. Just live.



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 05:22 AM
link   
reply to post by mockrock
 



I think you should do some research into conspiracies that turned out to be true.. This not as wild as it may seem.


Please provide one example of a "true" conspiracy that involved deliberately crashing a celestial body into the Earth.



posted on Nov, 4 2011 @ 07:33 AM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


I heard we should get more news on the 4th..does anyone know about this..



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 02:58 AM
link   
reply to post by br0ker
 


I don't claim to be superhuman, but my dream was extremely vivid and a pretty scary sight. I remember the scene like I actually saw it with my own eyes. I felt so small looking up and being at the mercy of another planetary body colliding with our own planet. If you had those dreams and a situation like this one came up, I'm sure you would tell somebody. We all come here to collaborate thoughts, ideas and experiences. I chose to share. No special powers here.



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 03:48 AM
link   
Does anyone know if YU55 will be visible to the naked eye?
edit on 5-11-2011 by reject because: youtube


Computer models showing the asteroid's path for the next 100 years show there is no chance it will hit Earth during that time, added Yeomans.

"We do not think that it will ever impact the Earth or moon (but) we only have its orbit calculated for the next 100 years," he said.

Previous studies show the asteroid, which is blacker than charcoal, is what is called a C-type asteroid that is likely made of carbon-based materials and some silicate rock
reuters
edit on 5-11-2011 by reject because: reuters


It will be too dim to be seen with the naked eye, however, and it will be moving too fast for viewing by the Hubble Space Telescope.

"The best time to observe it would be in the early evening on November 8 from the East Coast of the United States," Yeomans said. "It is going to be very faint, even at its closest approach. You will need a decent-sized telescope to be able to actually see the object as it flies by."
edit on 5-11-2011 by reject because: naked eye visibility info



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 09:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by flexy123

Originally posted by mockrock

Originally posted by jeichelberg
States that YU55 will not strike Earth...there is more here, including a diagram of the projected path...it will pass within .0022 AU, roughly 300Km from Earth...

neo.jpl.nasa.gov...


NASA not the most trustworthy source ! It's a propaganda machine !


A propaganda machine is someone who spreads lies and does fear mongering by distorting the truth.
In other words: You.



The world is waking up.. I have never said a single lie in any of my posts.

Ask me to prove anything I have said and I will, beyond doubt.. Is it a lie that NASA lied about the size of YU55 from the start..? and that if they based the trajectory on an object 175M diameter then (as trajectory was not adjusted with the increase in size to 400M) then that data is incorrect.

How can the size increase have no effect on the projected trajectory? Impossible.

Do you want to see the NASA NEO fact sheet from 2006 (after discovery of YU55) that doesn't even list the 2011 close pass? Yet mentions the one 80 years in the future?



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 09:18 AM
link   
Here is 2005 YU55 Animation made from photographs in 2010

C-14 @ f/5.5, ST-10XME, -10° & binned 3x3. Mounted on a Paramount ME which tracked the target. 54-30" exposures through a clear filter shot between 0749 and 0814 UT. FOV is 18' x 26'. At the time the images were taken 2005 YU55 was about 2,700,000 km away. The file is fairly large so it may take a few moments to load before the animation starts running.


www.slas.us...

for an object so dim.. they managed to capture it pretty well last year.



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 04:16 PM
link   
reply to post by mockrock
 



The world is waking up.. I have never said a single lie in any of my posts.


Perhaps not, but that is about to change:


Ask me to prove anything I have said and I will, beyond doubt.. Is it a lie that NASA lied about the size of YU55 from the start..? and that if they based the trajectory on an object 175M diameter then (as trajectory was not adjusted with the increase in size to 400M) then that data is incorrect.


Yes, it is a complete lie that NASA lied about the size of 2005 YU 55 from the start. When it was discovered, they estimated a range of sizes based on its possible albedo (reflectivity). If it was dark, it was large, if it was shiny, it would be small. This has been explained to you before; an educated guess is not a lie, to characterize it as such is. Subsequent radar measurements have established a better estimate for its size; apparently it is darker than the earlier assumptions. Its size has nothing to do with its trajectory; it is in orbit around the Sun; any object irrespective of size or mass will follow that same "trajectory." This has also been explained to you several times before, so repeating the claim is, in effect, another lie.


How can the size increase have no effect on the projected trajectory? Impossible.


Simply wrong. I suggest you read up on celestial mechanics before declaring something every High School student knows to be "impossible":

en.wikipedia.org...


Do you want to see the NASA NEO fact sheet from 2006 (after discovery of YU55) that doesn't even list the 2011 close pass? Yet mentions the one 80 years in the future?


Why should they have? This is not the closest pass it will make; that will be in another 80 years. We will discuss this topic again at that time.



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 08:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by mockrock
 



The world is waking up.. I have never said a single lie in any of my posts.


Perhaps not, but that is about to change:


Ask me to prove anything I have said and I will, beyond doubt.. Is it a lie that NASA lied about the size of YU55 from the start..? and that if they based the trajectory on an object 175M diameter then (as trajectory was not adjusted with the increase in size to 400M) then that data is incorrect.


Yes, it is a complete lie that NASA lied about the size of 2005 YU 55 from the start. When it was discovered, they estimated a range of sizes based on its possible albedo (reflectivity). If it was dark, it was large, if it was shiny, it would be small. This has been explained to you before; an educated guess is not a lie, to characterize it as such is. Subsequent radar measurements have established a better estimate for its size; apparently it is darker than the earlier assumptions. Its size has nothing to do with its trajectory; it is in orbit around the Sun; any object irrespective of size or mass will follow that same "trajectory." This has also been explained to you several times before, so repeating the claim is, in effect, another lie.


How can the size increase have no effect on the projected trajectory? Impossible.


Simply wrong. I suggest you read up on celestial mechanics before declaring something every High School student knows to be "impossible":

en.wikipedia.org...


Do you want to see the NASA NEO fact sheet from 2006 (after discovery of YU55) that doesn't even list the 2011 close pass? Yet mentions the one 80 years in the future?


Why should they have? This is not the closest pass it will make; that will be in another 80 years. We will discuss this topic again at that time.



Will deal with this tomorrow.. The Italians were more accurate in their original size estimate so maybe they were also right in their figure of 95 000 miles near miss figure..



posted on Nov, 5 2011 @ 08:31 PM
link   
NASA the american dream...

The von braun shame.. do some research guys..



posted on Nov, 6 2011 @ 07:06 PM
link   
November 3, 2011

Soldiers “End Of The World” Email Sends US Into Panic

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
www.whatdoesitmean.com...

An interesting Federal Security Services (FSB) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that the United States was thrown into a “panic” last week after one of its soldiers emailed his mother warning her to “prepare for the end of the world.”

According to this report, American Army Specialist William Millay [photo 2nd left], a 22-year-old military policeman from Owensboro, Kentucky, stationed at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska had “growing concerns” over the massive military buildup by the US Northern Command (NORTHCOM) of troops and equipment being secreted through his base from Afghanistan, Japan and South Korea headed towards “staging areas” throughout America.

The US Northern Command is a Unified Combatant Command of the United States military. Created on 1 October 2002 in the aftermath of the 11 September 2001 attacks whose mission is to protect the United States homeland and support local, state, and federal authorities. The support that NORTHCOM provides to civil authorities is limited by the Posse Comitatus Act which limits the role of the US Military in civil law enforcement.

However, in the case of national emergencies, natural or man-made, the US Air Forces Northern National Security Emergency Preparedness Directorate (AFNORTH) would take charge of the situation or event.

US military, intelligence and political “flash traffic” intercepted by the FSB relating to this event show, according to this report, that Specialist Millay believed that the redeployment of these tens of thousands of US troops to the American Homeland was “somehow” related to the 9 November nationwide testing of the United States Emergency Alert System (EAS) that is occurring “coincidentally” with a vast number of disaster drills and exercises being planned for the same time period."



posted on Nov, 6 2011 @ 07:32 PM
link   
reply to post by mockrock
 


That's it for you. Posting Sorcha Faal should be a capitol offense if not at the least undeniable evidence of fear mongering. You go stud.



posted on Nov, 6 2011 @ 07:40 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 
It would seem that it takes some new members a while till they separate
fact from fiction..
Since ATS opened the gates to facebook,. Ive noticed a greater number of posters just looking for attention rather than facts..of course it could be just coincidence.
The OP title was the first red flag



posted on Nov, 6 2011 @ 07:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
reply to post by randyvs
 
It would seem that it takes some new members a while till they separate
fact from fiction..
Since ATS opened the gates to facebook,. Ive noticed a greater number of posters just looking for attention rather than facts..of course it could be just coincidence.
The OP title was the first red flag



I easily forget that in the 90's I to thought that if it was on the web ? Well then it must be true !


Good to see you Drummer.



posted on Nov, 6 2011 @ 10:11 PM
link   
reply to post by mockrock
 


At this point I think you need to take a step back from all of this. You're clearly at the point where you've stopped vetting your sources. Sorcha Faal is the Queen of Hoaxes.
edit on 11/6/2011 by Xcalibur254 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2011 @ 10:21 PM
link   
I don't mean to knock on Phage, but I am going to knock on Phage...I noticed lately people have been asking questions, and they always mention, where's Phage?...Well where is Phage? Why is it Phage only comes around when its more of a debunking scenario, yet when people want truthful answers he is never around? I don't really get it...Do the research yourself, and don't rely on someone who you don't know personally! Just because they have status on ATS doesn't mean jack squat!...For all we know he could be working for NASA






top topics



 
31
<< 12  13  14    16  17 >>

log in

join