It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I never accused Mitchell of lying.
Originally posted by JimOberg
Nobody's accusing Cooper or Mitchell of lying.
Originally posted by eroutt
well the only thing we can do is take there word for it! whether you believe or not is up to you.
it seems to me that there just giving what is ordered of them! don't give to much just a nudge and let there imagination go crazy! i could be wrong?
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by Human_Alien
If this is what you mean and meant, let me ask you, what advantage would Cooper have to make up these stories? And since when would a qualified astronauts need a witness to verify his word?
So you've swallowed the NASA codswollop about the super-human space heroes and their olympian perfection? Who are you accusing of being a dupe of 'NASA propaganda'? Seems like YOU'RE the brainwashed one.
How about this 'since when' -- anybody making an extraordinary claim must be checked up on, especially those whose stories fit existing belief systems apparently so perfectly.
Can you use the internet to find information about the cost to hundreds of space workers and space community organizations who in the 1980s invested millions of dollars in aerospace industry investment schemes endorsed by Cooper? They all lost all their money.
They, like you, took Cooper's word as the sole source of reliable information. Are you saying they were prudent to have done so?
Cooper claims in his autobiography to have saved the space shuttle program from a lethal design flaw by relaying a telepathic message from apparent space aliens. Would you object to anyone seeking corroborative evidence for this, or do you advocate that your audience believe the story and avoid checking on it?
Just asking.
I don't get it.
But more so, I don't understand what's it to you (all the time) unless you're on NASA payroll. Are you?
Is that your only excuse -- that any evidence that threatens your feel-good belief system must be fabricated by paid liars? Grow up.
Too bad you weren't around to invest your money in the Cooper-promoted bunko schemes. You might have received a costly lesson.
Originally posted by JimOberg
OK, the consensus seems to be gelling:
1. Everything an astronaut says should be accepted at face value and never doubted.
Originally posted by JimOberg
So you've swallowed the NASA codswollop about the super-human space heroes and their olympian perfection? Who are you accusing of being a dupe of 'NASA propaganda'? Seems like YOU'RE the brainwashed one.
Originally posted by JimOberg
But if you believe NASA hero-worship propaganda I guess all those sad events -- including his being denied promotion from backup to prime crew for an Apollo lunar landing based on inadequate competence in training, leading to his angry resignation from the space program -- never happened, or if they did happen, you want them covered up. Just asking.
Originally posted by Idonthaveabeard
Sorry for bringing up 'pics or it didnt happen' thing, but imo there is only so much that words can do to convince people these days. Im not saying I dont believe the astronauts, they are very credible witnesses and I believe they did see something. But what we really need is a clear undeniable video, was there not one of these astronauts who took a video and it then got confiscated by the government?
An alien body dead or alive would be proof, but the alien autopsy video, along with every other photo or video of aliens I've ever seen all look fake.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
What we need is a captured UFO that bears the insignia "Made in Andromeda" with some sort of metal that's foreign to us because everything else (as far as proof) has been experienced and exhausted.
We have photos
We have videos
We have trace evidence
We have material
We have testimony
We have people passing lie-detector tests
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Originally posted by JimOberg
OK, the consensus seems to be gelling:
1. Everything an astronaut says should be accepted at face value and never doubted.
We were to believe them when they were reporting back to Mission Control whilst on the Moon so, "yes!" We are to believe them until proven otherwise. Their WHOLE mission and purpose was to be the eyes for the people and go where no (modern) man has gone before and report back to us. They were explorers! So their word is and was EVERYTHING Mr Oberg!
. It's almost disrespectful which I realize.... is your profession after all. You are paid to debunk everything paranormal. Who thinks like that? You set out to write for a magazine; Skeptical Inquirer, and challenge everyone who claims something, unusual and paranormal (mostly UFO-related). Pardon me but now I have to challenge YOUR motives!!
Why didn't you interview Cooper while he was alive? In fact, why don't you conduct an interview with one of the remaining UFO-seeing astronauts?
Seems you're picking on the only one who can't defend himself. That's not only being a bully that's also being an opportunist!