It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
reply to post by phishyblankwaters
Your reporter is funny.
Ethnic cleansing
Ethnic cleansing is a purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove by violent and terror-inspiring means the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group from certain geographic areas.
Now then, on to some facts.
Populations:
West Bank -
(1970)
Arabs - 677k
Jews - >1k
(2003)
Arabs - 2.3m
Jews - 219k
Gaza -
(1970)
Arabs - 368k
Jews - >1k
(2003)
Arabs - 1.33m
Jews - 243k
Jerusalem -
(1970)
Arabs - 1.04m
Jews - 2.58m
(2003)
Arabs - 5.13m
Jews - 5.27m
Israel is doing the ethnic cleansing thing, but hiding it so well that the Arab population doubles every 20 years, I guess.
Palestinians know they will never get all of Palestine back. They just want the right to exist and function as a country. Sanctions, blockades, settlement expansion are not what they want. They know violence will only bring forward more oppression. They even try the peaceful approach and look what Israel doeskin return. They try and annex the West Bank. Tell me who is moving backwards here.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by Humanity4Ever
I agree, Israel is an Apartheid state for certain.
. . .
Crime of Apartheid is crimes against humanity "committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime."
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
Crime of Apartheid is crimes against humanity "committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime."
Bingo!
That sums up Israel pretty well. Thank you for helping prove my point. It's funny how you help contradict your side of the debate while trying trying to disprove mine. Nothing else to say about that, you said it all for me.
Star for you
Originally posted by hdutton
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
I can't help but wonder if there is not something "a little on the wrong side" of annexing a part of an established state into another country.
I have a feeling such actions may be frowned upon by others in the international community.
Would this not be much like the U S annexing a part, or all, of Canada into the U S ?
Now please use examples based in fact that applies this definition to Israel.
Crime of Apartheid is crimes against humanity "committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime."
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
Now please use examples based in fact that applies this definition to Israel.
Sure, lets use the definition you provided.
Crime of Apartheid is crimes against humanity "committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime."
That whole definition explains modern day Israel so well that I could not define it any better. Thanks again by the way
I have answered all your questions and yet you have managed to avoid all of mine and not provide any answers at all. Let me step it up a notch. How about you tell me how your own definition of Apartheid does not apply to Israel. The post that provided the definition of examples that did not exclude Israel from being an Apartheid state, in fact it strengthens my argument. You are doing all the work for me. I really appreciate it. How about you give me a factual reason why Israel should not be considered an Apartheid state. I have already provided multiple reasons why they are to another member. Please reread your definition before you answer.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
How about you give me a factual reason why Israel should not be considered an Apartheid state.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
Now please use examples based in fact that applies this definition to Israel.
Sure, lets use the definition you provided.
Crime of Apartheid is crimes against humanity "committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime."
. . . How about you give me a factual reason why Israel should not be considered an Apartheid state. . . .
You have been provided with ample factual evidence to disprove your false assumptions by myself and others.