It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What you need reminding again? I have quoted this list at least twice already. I suggest you learn how to navigate through this thread and do your own leg work for a change. Are you keeping score of how many hoops you succeded in making people jump through, hoops of your construction?
Remind me which list, I'll bet I have. It's not my fault your kicking the ball crooked.
Ok that promise you made was also not lived up too. You asked:
Ok and you believe that the wolf would die without our existance? Or we would die without theres?
Now you maintain that it is whether the wolf or we would die without the others existance. So like everything else you say. Even your word that you will not change the goalposts cannot be trusted at all.
I'm still looking for anything that has a natural bond out of necessety with man. From birth to death, not something that many invokes like a dog.
No the key word here is 'DUMB'. We became reliant on walking upright, we wasnt always. Modern society has become reliant on electricity, it wasnt always. The house sparrow was not always a house sparrow and the evidence of that has also been explained to you. As always though your argument never holds any water and is from a point of purposeful ignorance.
The key word here is "become" he became reliant on humans, in other words, he wasn't always reliant. So man did something to cause this. He was a non fitting example for what I'm looking for.
What you need reminding again? I have quoted this list at least twice already. I suggest you learn how to navigate through this thread and do your own leg work for a change. Are you keeping score of how many hoops you succeded in making people jump through, hoops of your construction?
I assure you I'm not moving the goal post. Dying might be an extreme but it does get the point across.
Now you maintain that it is whether the wolf or we would die without the others existance. So like everything else you say. Even your word that you will not change the goalposts cannot be trusted at all.
You rule out dogs because, WHY? You maintain a dog remains a dog no matter how we selectively breed them. I have news for you. A dog remains a WOLF no matter how we select the qualities that we value.
So in answer to your question 'I'm still looking for anything that has a natural bond out of necessety with man. From birth to death' I give you the WOLF.
So in answer to your question 'I'm still looking for anything that has a natural bond out of necessety with man. From birth to death' I give you the WOLF.
The house sparrow has already shown it is dependant on man for its nesting sites and would not survive without us.
No the key word here is 'DUMB'. We became reliant on walking upright, we wasnt always. Modern society has become reliant on electricity, it wasnt always. The house sparrow was not always a house sparrow and the evidence of that has also been explained to you. As always though your argument never holds any water and is from a point of purposeful ignorance.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by colin42
So in answer to your question 'I'm still looking for anything that has a natural bond out of necessety with man. From birth to death' I give you the WOLF.
WTF. You did not just say that. They would die without us and we would die without them ???? What movie are you watching?
Still avoiding the difficult questions are you? No you should have addressed the answers I gave you immediately, I already had yours. That is the way a debate works. You did not but this forum like all others offers the function to go back. So your cowering away from the question is just more of your typically dishonest behaviour.
Those are things you should have addressed immediatly so that I could follow them up.
Your actions show your asurances mean absolutely nothing.
I assure you I'm not moving the goal post. Dying might be an extreme but it does get the point across.
No it is not a case of holding the goal post here just so you can cherry pick a line from my reply and ask another question (moving the goal post). It is now your turn to respond to my reply, my whole reply.
Ok lets hold the goal post here a second. What exactly do we depend on each other for.
I quoted what you wrote you foolish person. How old do you say you are. A thirteen year old townie is how you come across.
WTF. You did not just say that. They would die without us and we would die without them ???? What movie are you watching?
Which is not what you made out I said, again you being dishonest. Now in the context I wrote that line show me that I am wrong.
and in some cases we would not survive without them and they would not survive without us
Yes so it includes the house sparrow. You even admit as much in the reply from you above.
So thats fine, he found a use for man, that wasn't the question. I didn't want to know how many things found a use for man there are hundreds. I'm looking for ones that either had it from birth or would die without us.
What?? What?? How dumb are you. Go back and read it again. If this is beyond you, if you cannot understand the point being made I suggest your mental capacity would be stretched when trying to understand an episode of play school.
Either way, you allready admitted he bacame dependant, not that he always was. I missed the other part, are you trying to say we had a realtionship with him before we walked straight up.?
Well no, I just have no idea where or how far back to look.
Still avoiding the difficult questions are you? No you should have addressed the answers I gave you immediately, I already had yours. That is the way a debate works. You did not but this forum like all others offers the function to go back. So your cowering away from the question is just more of your typically dishonest behaviour.
Your actions show your asurances mean absolutely nothing.
Ok then give me a reply and I'll respond.
No it is not a case of holding the goal post here just so you can cherry pick a line from my reply and ask another question (moving the goal post). It is now your turn to respond to my reply, my whole reply.
I quoted what you wrote you foolish person. How old do you say you are. A thirteen year old townie is how you come across.
If you are quoting me then use my words
I might of changes sometimes in that. Unless you meant period, that they would die. I assumed you did a typo. How in the hell could all wolfs have died without our intervention?
Which is not what you made out I said, again you being dishonest. Now in the context I wrote that line show me that I am wrong.
Yes so it includes the house sparrow. You even admit as much in the reply from you above.
Not at all, your obviously avoiding the important grid. Which is understandable since you either don't understand the questions, or are just playing tag to avoid the questions all together. I think its the latter.
What?? What?? How dumb are you. Go back and read it again. If this is beyond you, if you cannot understand the point being made I suggest your mental capacity would be stretched when trying to understand an episode of play school.
Again I am giving you the benifit of doubt here and taking it this is more avoidance of addressing the point made which in itself is pathetic.
So are you ever intending to give an answer or do you intend to play this childish game page after page?
Originally posted by itsthetooth
I think we have however made some progress.
In the last dozen pages or so, we have established that according to colin42, apes are human.
Sanitation for drinking water is not a problem worth addressing.
Flagellum is a subject to totally ignore.
Answer questions intentionally going out of bounds of the question.
Profile others when your not able to get a leg up.
Rather than opening your eyes to the truth, nestle yourself deeper in your myth.
Mocking others by altering there account name.
Repeatly asking me to answer things that I answered a long time ago.
Yes and each page of childish excuses you make means you will have to go back further. I suggest you start now.
Well no, I just have no idea where or how far back to look.
You maintain you are a clever person. If I have been reminding you for 20 pages to answer unanswered questions try going back 21 pages. What is it with this profiling nonsense. You mate are profiling yourself. You have shown yourself to be dishonest, decietful, poorly educated and purposely ignorant. Your tantrums when cornered show you are around 13 or at least that is your mental age. You volunteered all that.
If I didn't know anybetter it sounds like you set it up to end up looking like your profiling me. There is really no point in telling me for 20 pages to answer unanswered questions when I have no idea what they are.
Great example of poorly educated. You asked a question and I answered it. Good manners alone says you address my answer. You have chosen again to cheery pick a line out of context and ask another question. So in case you still do not understand. YOUR TURN TO ANSWER. Only after that do you get the chance to ask.
Ok then give me a reply and I'll respond.
How pathetically imature. You can make the huge foundationless leap to maintain we dont fit because we have hands but cannot deduce what a townie is. How weak is that?
Now I'm going to profile you because your stereotyping me, and you must not be from the states because I have no idea what the hell a townie is.
Try reading what is written and not what you want to see so that you can win a point. You have been caught out doing this many times, too many times.
I might of changes sometimes in that. Unless you meant period, that they would die. I assumed you did a typo. How in the hell could all wolfs have died without our intervention?
You was told and shown that the house sparrow evolved from the tree sparrow and is reliant on mans buildings for nesting sites, hence the common name House Sparrow. You chose to ignore this even though it was backed up with links. So why are you playing dumb? Are you playing dumb or is it real? You are certainly lying if you maintain to be uninformed about the house sparrow. PLEASE THINK ABOUT YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS WHILST AT SCHOOL TODAY.
Ok so now your trying to tell me he has always been dependant on us, why are you lying, you had first told me that he had become dependant on us. So which is it, has he always been or became.
Oh please dont tell me that you think, there is no evidence for it.
Not at all, your obviously avoiding the important grid. Which is understandable since you either don't understand the questions, or are just playing tag to avoid the questions all together. I think its the latter.
You: The key word here is "become" he became reliant on humans, in other words, he wasn't always reliant. So man did something to cause this. He was a non fitting example for what I'm looking for.
My reply: No the key word here is 'DUMB'. We became reliant on walking upright, we wasnt always. Modern society has become reliant on electricity, it wasnt always. The house sparrow was not always a house sparrow and the evidence of that has also been explained to you. As always though your argument never holds any water and is from a point of purposeful ignorance.
Your Dumb Reply: Either way, you allready admitted he bacame dependant, not that he always was. I missed the other part, are you trying to say we had a realtionship with him before we walked straight up.?
My Response: What?? What?? How dumb are you. Go back and read it again. If this is beyond you, if you cannot understand the point being made I suggest your mental capacity would be stretched when trying to understand an episode of play school.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
I think we have however made some progress.
In the last dozen pages or so, we have established that according to colin42, apes are human.
Sanitation for drinking water is not a problem worth addressing.
Flagellum is a subject to totally ignore.
Answer questions intentionally going out of bounds of the question.
Profile others when your not able to get a leg up.
Rather than opening your eyes to the truth, nestle yourself deeper in your myth.
Mocking others by altering there account name.
Repeatly asking me to answer things that I answered a long time ago.
Warned you of this I did. Great danger in the training of this young padawan there was. The pull of the dark side is strong I said. The future is no longer clear, a disturbance in the force there is.
Originally posted by flyingfish
Originally posted by itsthetooth
I think we have however made some progress.
In the last dozen pages or so, we have established that according to colin42, apes are human.
Sanitation for drinking water is not a problem worth addressing.
Flagellum is a subject to totally ignore.
Answer questions intentionally going out of bounds of the question.
Profile others when your not able to get a leg up.
Rather than opening your eyes to the truth, nestle yourself deeper in your myth.
Mocking others by altering there account name.
Repeatly asking me to answer things that I answered a long time ago.
itsthespooth, you do not yet realize your importance. You have only begun to discover your power. Join me, and I will complete your training. With our combined strength, we can end this destructive conflict and bring order to the galaxy.
Originally posted by colin42
Warned you of this I did. Great danger in the training of this young padawan there was. The pull of the dark side is strong I said. The future is no longer clear, a disturbance in the force there is.
Originally posted by flyingfish
Originally posted by itsthetooth
I think we have however made some progress.
In the last dozen pages or so, we have established that according to colin42, apes are human.
Sanitation for drinking water is not a problem worth addressing.
Flagellum is a subject to totally ignore.
Answer questions intentionally going out of bounds of the question.
Profile others when your not able to get a leg up.
Rather than opening your eyes to the truth, nestle yourself deeper in your myth.
Mocking others by altering there account name.
Repeatly asking me to answer things that I answered a long time ago.
itsthespooth, you do not yet realize your importance. You have only begun to discover your power. Join me, and I will complete your training. With our combined strength, we can end this destructive conflict and bring order to the galaxy.
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by HappyBunny
This very post is what I meant by "moving the goal post".
First you say he never said it.
I show that he did.....
And you move the goal post to exclude private conversation.
The fact is, he did say it and thought about it. You were wrong and can not admit it.
Childish.
Look at what Mr. XYZ said. By his definition on page 157 or 158.
I proved by his own definition that evolution was wrong.
Did I think that I actually proved the entire theory wrong?
Of course not.
I did, however, prove it wrong by the definition that was given by XYZ.
Did he say good job and we have a good laugh over it?
No he moved the goal post and attacked. Kinda like your doing.
Childish
It would probably surprise you the amount of information the theory of evolution has sucked into itself that I actually do agree with.
I never claimed to be a young earther. I do however see similarities in the Creation story and what science has to say on the matter.
Go back and read the back and forth between colin and I.
It makes since using biology that plants were the first complex life. Then life in the oceans and birds (yes birds, look back to our discussion), then life on land. Lastly humans.
This is also the order of life in the Creation story.
You don't find the fact that this order was written down more than 2500 years ago just alittle curious?
In a earlier post you chided me about assuming something about your "intellectual beliefs" .
I would appreciate it if you would follow your own advice.
Quad
This very post is what I meant by "moving the goal post".
First you say he never said it.
I show that he did.....
And you move the goal post to exclude private conversation.
The fact is, he did say it and thought about it. You were wrong and can not admit it.
I never claimed to be a young earther. I do however see similarities in the Creation story and what science has to say on the matter.
You don't find the fact that this order was written down more than 2500 years ago just alittle curious?
In a earlier post you chided me about assuming something about your "intellectual beliefs" .
I would appreciate it if you would follow your own advice.