It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Patman12
reply to post by Shadow Herder
You cited wikipedia as your source there... Thats unreliable as many "truthers" can go on and edit when they want. You need to find more reliable sources.
en.wikipedia.org...
At 10:03:11, near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, the plane crashed into a reclaimed coal strip mine in Stonycreek Township in Somerset County.[59] The National Transportation Safety Board reported that the flight impacted at 563 miles per hour (906 km/h) at a 40-degree nose-down, inverted attitude.[19] The impact left a crater eight to ten feet deep (c. 3 m), and 30 to 50 feet wide (c. 12 m).
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
I understand why you would think the description of the hole is falsified. How can a 123+ foot wide airliner leave a crater only 30 feet wide and 10 + feet deep.
The ground is not broken and is weathered.
Hooper, contribute to the discussion or bugger off.
You are revealing yourself to be an un-informative troll here at ATS.
Prove me wrong. You have yet to prove anything but blatant willful ignorance.
"I've no plans to call on you, Clarice. The world is more interesting with you in it."
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by ATH911
Skeptics, care to comment?
We have a 580 mph mostly burying plane (the 80% that houses the fuel tanks)
no burnt grass surrounding the crater
and a huge huge mushroom cloud
How can that be, skeptics?
Hooper the non-contributing troll....
....claims the plane turned into conffetti the millisecond the nose touched the ground so according to hooper the wings never hit the ground.
He says that because that there is no evidence of what ever caused the crater having wings any where near the dimensions of a Boeing 757 so he invents the most stupid idea.
Get used to it. He and 3 others are trolls here.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Shadow Herder
he wings never hit the ground, huh? Lets think about that - what choices do we have - wings never hit the ground, wings completely hit the ground and maybe some of the wings hit the ground. Think I'll go with maybe some of the wing hit the ground.
You are not well.
I think you might need to think things over before you reply as you are just confirming that your purposefully playing stupid.
Prove that any part of the wing hit the ground.
Pictures wont do.
Show us which wing hit what broke off and where did it hit the ground. Show us where the vertical stabilizer hit.
Still waiting for those official dimensions of the crater since you claim wikipedia, the county corner and others who were there are all lying when they described the hole. Hannibal
We all know here that talking to you hooper is a waste of time and everyone claims you are a 911 troll here. I dont think there is anything you can say or do to change that.
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by ATH911
Skeptics, care to comment?
You still didnt provide us with what was fake in the wiki article. Still waiting.
Originally posted by Patman12
reply to post by Shadow Herder
You cited wikipedia as your source there... Thats unreliable as many "truthers" can go on and edit when they want. You need to find more reliable sources.