How was there even an explosion at Shanksville (officially speaking)?, page 2

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by ATH911

---

I criticize the way it is "compiled". A little from column A and little from column B, a snippet from one newspaper, half a photograph of this, etc.

You're suggesting I quote-mined. Please show me where I did that.

Official version of what?

Don't play stupid (maybe you're not playing?!). The official version of the UA93 crash details.

Uh, why would you ask the county coroner about the dynamics of the plane impact?

Cause he was working under the FBI who told him what happened, hence "the explanation was..."

And what is it I'm making up?

You said Miller told the truthers "what he thinks he heard from the FBI." Do you know that for a fact, or are you just wildly guessing?

Working "under"? Miller is a duly elected public official.

Yes, working under. If you don't know what I mean by that, perhaps you're not smart enough to participate in this thread. It requires a certain amount intelligence.

Nope, let me put it this way, its 10 years now and if you don't know how to find photo images of the site on the internet then telling you where to find them isn't going to help.

I know how to find photos (an intelligent person would know that by seeing my OP), I just haven't seen any with fire damage to the grassy field outside the small crater. You said that "just about any of them" show fire damage to the greenish grass surrounding the crater that I asked about, consistent with the explosion from the est. 7,000 gallons of jet fuel on board at impact. I'd like to see just one, if I may.

So, according to you, the county coroner said that the first thing to hit the ground was the wing full of fuel but for some strange reason you don't think this could result in an explosion. Please explain your odd position.

Um, I did. It's in the OP. An intelligent person would have noticed that.

Btw, did UA93 crash the way Miller said the explanation was, wingtip hip/began to cartwheel/cockpit broke off into trees/rest buried?

reply to post by ATH911

---

You're suggesting I quote-mined. Please show me where I did that.

Look at your avatar, thats graphic evidence.

Don't play stupid (maybe you're not playing?!). The official version of the UA93 crash details.

As far as I know no official description of the impact dynamics has been publically released. So there is no official crash details.

Cause he was working under the FBI who told him what happened, hence "the explanation was..."

What comes after the .....?

You said Miller told the truthers "what he thinks he heard from the FBI." Do you know that for a fact, or are you just wildly guessing?

Uh, you just said the FBI told him so why am I wildly guessing when I say the same thing?

Yes, working under. If you don't know what I mean by that, perhaps you're not smart enough to participate in this thread. It requires a certain amount intelligence.

No, he was not working "under" the FBI, he was the duly elected county coroner. The Federal Bureau of Investigation does not have the authority to direct the activities of public elected officials in the their official capacity. Basic civics.

I know how to find photos (an intelligent person would know that by seeing my OP), I just haven't seen any with fire damage to the grassy field outside the small crater. You said that "just about any of them" show fire damage to the greenish grass surrounding the crater that I asked about, consistent with the explosion from the est. 7,000 gallons of jet fuel on board at impact. I'd like to see just one, if I may.

Then keep looking.

Um, I did. It's in the OP. An intelligent person would have noticed that.

No you didn't. According to you the wing full of fuel hit first.

Btw, did UA93 crash the way Miller said the explanation was, wingtip hip/began to cartwheel/cockpit broke off into trees/rest buried?

I don't know and neither do you.

Enough with the stupid and lack of intelligence stuff. You want discourse, fine. You want to call people stupid that don't agree with you than maybe you can understand why its 10 years and no one cares what you think or say.

reply to post by Shadow Herder

---

If you did any research you will learn that what looks like scars from the wings were not caused by wings at all. The marks were present before 911. Fact.

Proof? And not just some old aerial photo, we've all seen it. I want coordinates for the all the points related to the State plane coordinates. Anything other than that and its not a fact, it is, at best a guess at worse it is a lie.

reply to post by hooper

---

Hooper you and 3 others are the only 'debunkers' here and resident ones at that. You have seen all the evidence. You are no authority and have proven yourself here to have very little knowledge. Dont pretend or play stupid. Dont be a troll.

You know that the 'wing scars' were not caused by wings at all as they were present before 9/11. You know this.

Originally posted by Shadow Herder
reply to post by hooper

---

Hooper you and 3 others are the only 'debunkers' here and resident ones at that. You have seen all the evidence. You are no authority and have proven yourself here to have very little knowledge. Dont pretend or play stupid. Dont be a troll.

You know that the 'wing scars' were not caused by wings at all as they were present before 9/11. You know this.

edit on 21-9-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)

edit on 21-9-2011 by Shadow Herder because: (no reason given)

Sorry, simply repeating over and over and over again that the wing scars were there before 9/11/2001 doesn't make it true. Prove it with numbers. Or just admit you have no way to prove it and you're lying.

reply to post by hooper

---

I dont have to prove the wings never hit the ground. The evidence shows that the wings scars were present before 911 therefore there is no evidence to suggest an aircraft with wingspan at over 123 feet wide ever hit the ground in Shanksville.. Aka Flight 93.

Are you saying the wings hit the ground?

reply to post by Shadow Herder

---

I dont have to prove the wings never hit the ground.

You don't have to do anything. I don't care and neither does anyone else. You want people to start listening and paying attention - then yes you have to provide proof for your claims.

The evidence shows that the wings scars were present before 911 therefore there is no evidence to suggest an aircraft with wingspan at over 123 feet wide ever hit the ground in Shanksville.. Aka Flight 93.

Again, there is no evidence. Simply repeating the same thing over and over is not evidence.

Are you saying the wings hit the ground?

Well, its been ten years, I don't think they're still flying around up there.

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Shadow Herder

---

over and over is not evidence.

Are you saying the wings hit the ground?

Well, its been ten years, I don't think they're still flying around up there.

Well get your bull stories straight before you try to troll here on ATS.

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Shadow Herder

---

You know the plane exploded within milliseconds of making of impact.

You know the entire plane never made it to the ground.

This is your insane response as to how the plane's wings never struck the ground as you agreed that the "wings scars" werent caused by wings on 911 or by a Boeing 757.

You should find something else to do other than sit here on ATS on the 911 forum and troll. Really.

reply to post by waypastvne

---

I never said that the scar that was present in the 90's was the exact scar that the crater was made on 911 but thanks for bringing it up. Look at that.

It is in the exact location but not the exact same scar but both are natural and weathered and not caused by a Boeing 757.

Your image just shows what really caused the 'wing scar' illusion was NOT made by a Boeing 757 on 911. Thanks.

reply to post by Shadow Herder

---

This is in response as to how the plane's wings never struck the ground as you agreed that the "wings scars" werent caused by wings on 911 or by a Boeing 757.

No it wasn't, it was in response to a discussion about the crater size. The entire or whole plane never made it, as a unit, to the ground.

You should find something else to do other than sit here on ATS on the 911 forum and troll. Really.

You really hate being called out on your little fabrications, don't you? Just puts your panties in a bunch, I can see you sitting there thinking that maybe you're about to hook some young, gullible "thinker" into your world when along comes the spoiler asking you to prove your propositions. So, any tangilble proof yet those wing scars were there before 9/11/2001 or are you just going with the old post, repeat, post, repeat?

reply to post by hooper

---

I will give you one last chance.

Without out injecting your double speak or nonsensical responses please provide us and enlighten us with official description, dimensions, trajectory of the plane and crater. We are eagerly waiting.

Show one official source that claims the old weathered trenches were caused by a Boeing 757 on 9/11. Good luck.

Originally posted by Shadow Herder
reply to post by hooper

---

I will give you one last chance.

Without out injecting your double speak or nonsensical responses please provide us and enlighten us with official description, dimensions, trajectory of the plane and crater. We are eagerly waiting.

Show one official source that claims the old weathered trenches were caused by a Boeing 757 on 9/11. Good luck.

Thank you for admitting that you have nothing to back up your proposition with regard to the location of the "old weathered trenches" (pulled that one out of your * :lol and the impact crater. So do you have anything else?

Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 13 days ago with 48 member flags

9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 5 days ago with 45 member flags

9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 15 days ago with 43 member flags

WTC7, the smoking gun that just will not go away until the traitors are rounded up
  Posted 6 days ago with 40 member flags

What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 9 days ago with 17 member flags

Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 17 days ago with 13 member flags

Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 19 days ago with 9 member flags

British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 9 days ago with 8 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: