Our Leaders Are Well Aware Of The Coming 2012 Destruction And They Are Prepared To Survive

reply to post by stereologist


Describe what nibiru is to me, please. Then why you think it can't exist? And also what you think this universe is? While we're at it, are you an athiest, agnostic or do have a faith? The reason I'm asking is do you believe in a concrete material marble atom based fluke universe, or something more?

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by SystemResistor

 

Nibiru does not exist. It has been assigned impossible properties. Events claimed to be associated with Nibiru are false. Nibiru is a hoax no matter how you examine the situation.

what if nibiru is like a "death star" under intelligent control?...a gigantic mothership!....which may be able to sheild itself from our radar and satellite detection and remain unseen untill its already in orbit around earth! if so, lets hope that those who constructed it, those onboard approaching earth, are not evil. because if they are, we are in for a very rude awakening...

reply to post by blocula


So what. You have located a few well known bunkers. What does any of this have to do with 2012? The answer is nothing. These bunkers were constructed going back to the 50s before all of this 2012 hoax malarkey popped up. The link states that for Cheyenne Mtn, Raven Rock, the Moscow Metro, Iron Mtn, the Greenbrier.

BTW, the Greenbrier is not in Virginia as stated on the site you linked. The bunker is open to public tours.

The site also includes the seed vault at Svalbard. It does not hold humans and is only 1 of many seed vaults in the world.

Your link includes bunkers real and imagined in the US, Canada, and China. The Norway claim is baloney.

So is this your bet that the leaders of China, the US, and Canada are going to go take vacations to these places?

reply to post by Unity_99


Nibiru is a fictional planet dreamed up by Sitchin. He claims it is in Sumerian tablets, but the word is not Sumerian. He ascribed impossible properties to the planet such as a 3600 year highly elliptical orbit.

The rest of your questions are trash.

reply to post by blocula


If you want to make up your own fictional planet/whatever then at least make up your own name for this thing you suggest.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by blocula

 

If you want to make up your own fictional planet/whatever then at least make up your own name for this thing you suggest.

nibiru is not fiction, its a word that the ancient babylonians used > en.wikipedia.org...(Babylonian_astronomy) and maybe the nibiru "death star" will arrive and orbit earth in conjunction with our elite leaders rising up out of their blast proof bunkers and together with the evil aliens "reptilians"?,"insectoids"? who will descend from nibiru, just like they did in ancient babylonia and sumeria and completely enslave the remaining human survivors...you and me?

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Unity_99

 

Nibiru is a fictional planet dreamed up by Sitchin. He claims it is in Sumerian tablets, but the word is not Sumerian. He ascribed impossible properties to the planet such as a 3600 year highly elliptical orbit.

The rest of your questions are trash.

No its not. Its the Eye of Horus. The gateway to the abyss. The Shadow. The Destroyer. Revelations 9 11.

The home of the beings/entiteis that TPTB follow.

Its also the opposite of the sun.

What do you think the day of darkness means?

In revelatons the abyss opens and in Mayan prophecy, its the return of Quetzcoatl. In our terms things would get intense and people become polarized. Like evil being let loose in the world.

Now, one scientist saw Elenin on the edge of a magnetic field.

He didn't see a dwarf star!

9 11 means revelation 9 11.

Nibiru has a big meaning.

My personal belief is its related to the links in these posts

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.lanl.gov...

What the mission has not found is what they were expecting, that is, evidence of large-scale dynamic processes that might be analogous to storms and tornados from the collision of a cold front and a warm front. A striking result is that "our maps show structure and energy spectra that are completely different from what any model has predicted," he noted.

"The ribbon follows a circular arc of high pressure that we believe is centered on the direction of the magnetic field of the interstellar cloud through which we are moving," Funsten said. This magnetic field seems to fundamentally organize the interaction region.

The results of IBEX not only reveal fundamental properties of the heliosheath but also provide key information about the properties of the interstellar cloud through which our galaxy is moving. We will be moving out of the cloud in about 10,000 years; the IBEX results will help LANL scientists understand how the Earth's space environment might be different when this happens.

WOrmwood Express 18 - NASA in rather unsubtle block! - stereo COR2A 05 and 25-28.06.2011HD


NASA micro fibres or massive fib...errrs...


Browse Movies Upload
2012 Equation Solved - Part 4/8

Originally posted by blocula

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by blocula

 

If you want to make up your own fictional planet/whatever then at least make up your own name for this thing you suggest.

nibiru is not fiction, its a word that the ancient babylonians used > en.wikipedia.org...(Babylonian_astronomy) and maybe the nibiru "death star" will arrive and orbit earth in conjunction with our elite leaders rising up out of their blast proof bunkers and together with the evil aliens "reptilians"?,"insectoids"? who will descend from nibiru, just like they did in ancient babylonia and sumeria and completely enslave the remaining human survivors...you and me?

edit on 22-9-2011 by blocula because: (no reason given)

if this actually happened ^^^ right now....right away 90% of humanity would "flip out" and this flipping out period would be followed by mass panic and mass suicides and those who were mentally strong enough to endure and face the bitter truth would end up slaves and servants...

reply to post by blocula


Nibiru is clearly fictional. It is not a word used by the Babylonians to describe an unknown planet. Sitchin claims that he translated Sumerian tablets on astronomy.

Here is what your link states:

Nibiru, a pseudoscientific planetary object described by Zecharia Sitchin

If you went on to the Babylonian astroomy link you provided you would see that it does not refer to an unknown planet.

The fictional planet has impossible properties. It does not exist.

There was no invasion of aliens during the time of the Sumerians or Babylonians.

reply to post by Unity_99


UNity_99 your post is a lot of fiction too. No wonder there.
1. You cite the bible but Nibiru is a fiction created by Sitchin who claims it came from Sumerian sources.
2. You claim it is opposite the Sun - another impossible condition. Learn some basic astronomy to find out why
3. The day of darkness is another hoax as well
4. There is no connection with 2012 and Quetzcoatl. The 2 are not connected.
5. No one saw Elenin on the edge of a magnetic field

Many people duped by 2012 try to throw lots of rubbish on the pile in the hopes that if there is enough debris in one pile something must be right. Not the case.

reply to post by Unity_99


So now its to the video whatever. You mention the IBEX satellite. The map you show is from a report a year ago. What does that have to do with a fictional planet?

So please introduce these videos. You know I have a longstanding tradition not to watch videos that are not introduced. I do not waste my time watching pointless videos.

reply to post by blocula

if this actually happened ^^^ right now....right away 90% of humanity would "flip out" and this flipping out period would be followed by mass panic and mass suicides and those who were mentally strong enough to endure and face the bitter truth would end up slaves and servants...

Obviously there is not going to be an invasion from a planet that does not exist.

reply to post by blocula


don't worry the russian R-36m Voiveda will be more than sufficient for Cheyenne mountain.25 Mt high precision.
Will turn Cheyenne mountain to Cheyenne lake.

nibiru "is" a word translated from ancient babylonian texts describing a "planet of crossing" , "point of transition"...it probably was a gigantic mothership,a death star...the moon?...> www.crystalinks.com...

the sun may have a companion star > www.spacedog.eu...

and why does every ancient culture speak of "those who came from the sky"? a coincidence?...i don't think so...

reply to post by blocula


That's right the Babylonians used the word and so did the Akkadians who were the first to use it. The word does refer to Marduk which is Jupiter. It also refers to a point in space and the constellation at that position and it refers to known planets. It never ever refers to an unknown planet. That is Sitchin's fiction as is his claim that the word came from Sumer.

If you continue down through the link you posted you see that the idea of Nibiru comes from Sitchin, the hoaxer.

Part of his theory lies in an astronomical interpretation of the Babylonian creation myth, the Enuma Elish, in which he replaces the names of gods with hypothetical planets. However, since the principal evidence for Sitchin's claims lies in his own personally derived etymologies and not on any scholarly agreed interpretations, his theories remain at most pseudoscience to the majority of academics.

Sitchin's theory proposes the planets Tiamat and Nibiru. Tiamat supposedly existed between Mars and Jupiter. He postulated that it was a thriving world in a much differently shaped solar system, with jungles and oceans, whose orbit was disrupted by the arrival of a large planet or very small star (less than twenty times the size of Jupiter) which passed through the solar system between 65 million and four billion years ago. The new orbits caused Tiamat to collide with one of the moons of this object, which is known as Nibiru. The debris from this collision are thought by the theory's proponents to have variously formed the asteroid belt, the Moon, and the current inclination of the planet Earth.

Nowhere does your link suggest anything about a mothership or death star or whatever you are claiming.

And if you were to read up on Nibiru you'd learn that Sitchin has it returning decades from now.

The claims of Tiamat are obviously false. There is less than 4% of a small planet o mass in the asteroid belt. Toss in the Moon and there is still only a fraction of the mass needed to form a planet.

Nibiru has impossible properties. The evidence is overwhelmingly against it.

reply to post by blocula

and why does every ancient culture speak of "those who came from the sky"? a coincidence?...i don't think so...

Not every ancient culture. There are those that have those who came from below.

Just because many cultures have stories of floods does not mean that happened either. There was never a global flood. Coincidence? Obviously.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Unity_99

 

UNity_99 your post is a lot of fiction too. No wonder there.
1. You cite the bible but Nibiru is a fiction created by Sitchin who claims it came from Sumerian sources.
2. You claim it is opposite the Sun - another impossible condition. Learn some basic astronomy to find out why
3. The day of darkness is another hoax as well
4. There is no connection with 2012 and Quetzcoatl. The 2 are not connected.
5. No one saw Elenin on the edge of a magnetic field

Many people duped by 2012 try to throw lots of rubbish on the pile in the hopes that if there is enough debris in one pile something must be right. Not the case.

Truth is always truth. Most of the things released are pure fiction. But you're arguing scientific terms for terms that really are something else.

In the science department not only are there different theories, ie the homoginized limited view or the Electric Universe (yes I displayed a definitive slant there!), but there is also a body of evidence. that is ignored.

So someone brings out one bit of data or a release from NASA but there are other releases already and other information, that totally either puts a different SLANT on the conclusion one would reach OR hides what they really are following.

I know what they're following. I bet you do too.

The videos posted are facts. So is the Gravitational Lensing Effect ones. NASA themselves released a video to show how they use this to discover dark masses that are hard to see.

Well, that is demonstrated clearly in their NASA behind photos.

Stop trying to put people in boxes and start to either open your own mind or SAY NO to bad orders.

anyone feel that its wierd that THE USA is going to Defcon 1 and placving the president underground this weekend? and this happens today?


connect the f-ing dots people!

reply to post by Unity_99

In the science department not only are there different theories, ie the homoginized limited view or the Electric Universe (yes I displayed a definitive slant there!), but there is also a body of evidence. that is ignored.

False. Evidence is not ignored by scientists. It is ignored by fringe proponents.

The videos posted are facts.

Consider the first video. It shows an error on the lens. This is a well known artifact. So what?

Only a doofus would think it is an actual object since the crescent would be on the wrong side of the object.

Stop trying to put people in boxes and start to either open your own mind or SAY NO to bad orders.

Stop trying deceive people.