It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bftroop
Every human has the right to face their accuser and defend themselves as they are accused. No matter the magnitude of the crime. This is the American way. The constitutional way.
Guilt without proof, is justice without law.
Our Country is built on a just and fair foundation according to our constitutional and moral convictions as keepers of liberty.
No, Bin Laden has not been captured yet.If he was captured they would have brought him back to the united states .There is not a single shred of evidence that he was captured.By comparison,There would be 10 million times the evidence that there is thriving bigfoot population in most parts of the united states.
Originally posted by fixer1967
Originally posted by brindle
I think when they eventually catch him,give him a trial to prove he did it .
They aleady did catch him and shoot him dead.
You statement sounds like you did not know this.
Originally posted by Imogene72
reply to post by WarminIndy
I am sorry, but you are incorrect. The trial is not a citizen's right, it's a human's right.
And a very basic one. I assure you.
Edit to correct myself: the Fair trial.edit on 16-9-2011 by Imogene72 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ka119
Originally posted by seachange
Originally posted by ka119
I stumbled upon THIS article today on MSN and it made me wonder.. Did Osama Bin Laden deserve a trial?
You don't believe in the founding ideas of America. And frankly you'd have to be a totalitarian thug. The fact that Barack the MURDERER Obama was not arrested immediately is a sign that most Americans have sick and twisted moral values.
Uhm.. I missed the part where you said what Barack THE MURDERER Obama did to deserve that title.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by WarminIndy
But Osama bin Laden was not a citizen,therefore not entitled to rights as a citizen.
That is the part that really bugs me about that side of this whole argument. Why is he not entitled to rights that we hold to be "self-evident" and "inalienable?" I understand that we don't technically have to extend those rights, but since our nation is founded upon those principles, and the wars are fought to bring these inalienable human rights to all people, then how can we say he is not entitled to them?
If he is not entitled to our inalienable rights, then our nation has no moral basis to ever condemn the human rights violations of other leaders, and we have no basis to ever "liberate" anyone ever again.
Either all people are entitled to them or not. We can't fight it both ways. We can't condemn and kill Saddam, and then say human rights are only for US Citizens?
Originally posted by GovtFlu
reply to post by nenothtu
" But a trial under WHOSE laws?"
People were murdered in New York.. New York is in the US, last I checked.. duh.
Nazis didn't like trials either.. so whats the difference between Nazis summarily killing innocent people without a trial, and bushbama doing it?.. with drones (buzz bomb?), assassin teams (Gestapo), special forces (SS). GOP & DNC party leaders / Nazi party leaders.. kill strangers the same way, only the propaganda has changed.
Change the terms & reasons.. history repeats, political "party leaders" persuade sheeple into supporting fascism... 1930s Germans refused to believe they were 1930s Germans, too..
Originally posted by WarminIndy
If you invoke the Constitution at trials, you are only given the right to a fair and speedy trial with a jury of your peers and the right not to incriminate yourself. But that is guaranteed for American citizens, hence, We the People of the United States of America.
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
Originally posted by WarminIndy
If you invoke the Constitution at trials, you are only given the right to a fair and speedy trial with a jury of your peers and the right not to incriminate yourself. But that is guaranteed for American citizens, hence, We the People of the United States of America.
I believe non-citizen nationals and aliens also have those rights in trials conducted under the Constitution. The Fifth Amendment refers to a "person," not "the people." The nationality of the person is not specified.