It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Thread in Support of the Official Story

page: 7
7
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 08:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by Juanxlink
Guess that an aluminium plane that desintegrated upon impact with the wall went all the way through 4 more concrete walls...
Oh wait did it not dissintegrate on impact?
Wich one is it fairytalers? Vaporised on impact or through 3 rings? Cant have it both ways...

Can't have what both ways? You don't think that debris travelling at 500mph can do any damage?

Do you have a clue about what you're saying? Of course something can hit a wall and do damage while not remaining completely intact. The parts that breeched the third ring were going to be the heaviest and densest elements. Probably the front landing gear from the debris found inside the ring.

Oh, and for what it's worth, there's not 3 rings on the bottom floors. I didn't expect you to know that either.




posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 09:00 AM
link   
reply to post by exponent
 


What debris? You mean the vaporised aluminium? Or the non existant titanium engine parts? You can bicker about the 3 rings, we know what it means, but hey, try and discredit me all you can, wont make you look better...



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 09:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Juanxlink
reply to post by exponent
 


What debris? You mean the vaporised aluminium? Or the non existant titanium engine parts? You can bicker about the 3 rings, we know what it means, but hey, try and discredit me all you can, wont make you look better...


You discredit yourself by making illogical statements and by not even knowing basic facts. Aluminium didn't vaporise, it hit the building at high speed and ended up scattered all over the site. The heavier and denser steel and engine parts etc made it further in.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out what happened at the Pentagon. Just someone willing to research the information available, rather than the information that supports them.



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 11:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by hooper
Well, you asked for it. Here it is. I am providing the link to the American Society of Civil Engineers Pentagon Building Performance Study.

fire.nist.gov...

It supports the official story. Have at it.

Then we'll move on to the other reports.
No personal incredulity please!


Your link is bad.



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 01:57 PM
link   
reply to post by kidtwist
 


They are not all aerial photographs. Plus the one aerial photo he posted it was zoomed into the relevant sections to show the cameras. Did you miss that?

Plus the aerial photo you posted was much lower quality. He posted a higher quality one where you can see them. Don't try to trick people here, this is what we do. To dissect your stories.
edit on 023030p://6America/ChicagoTue, 05 Jun 2012 14:02:14 -0500 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 01:57 PM
link   
reply to post by exponent
 


Hey if the pentagon did not have anything to hide why did they not release the other camera footage?



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 02:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by exponent
 


Hey if the pentagon did not have anything to hide why did they not release the other camera footage?


A list of the videos that have been released.

Purple ---- The 2 security gate cameras.

Blue -------The 7 Citgo cameras.

Yellow ----The DEA camera.

Green ----- The 15 Doubletree Cameras.

A list of videos that have not been released.

Red -------Three pan and tilt Pentagon roof security cameras.

Are there any others you would like to add to this list ?






posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 02:23 PM
link   
reply to post by waypastvne
 


They have not released the red yet according to you. There may be others that we are unaware of.



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 02:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by waypastvne
 


They have not released the red yet according to you. There may be others that we are unaware of.


Well then point them out to us. Don't ask for evidence that is not there. Provide us with the locations of the cameras you want video for.




posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 02:35 PM
link   

edit on 6/5/2012 by ANOK because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 02:35 PM
link   
reply to post by waypastvne
 


And it isn't the least bit curious to you why there is no footage of a plane?

CJ



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 02:43 PM
link   
reply to post by waypastvne
 


We need to send inspectors in if they are not hiding anything, to make sure that all the cameras are accounted for.



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 02:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by waypastvne
 


And it isn't the least bit curious to you why there is no footage of a plane?

CJ


No not at all. With all the security cameras in NY these 2 are the best we have for Hudson landing.



Where are all the other videos ?



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 02:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by waypastvne

Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by waypastvne
 


And it isn't the least bit curious to you why there is no footage of a plane?

CJ


No not at all. With all the security cameras in NY these 2 are the best we have for Hudson landing.



Where are all the other videos ?


But there are more cameras on the pentagon than any other building so surely more conclusive footage should have been released?



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 02:50 PM
link   
reply to post by waypastvne
 


Really? Not surprised at all? Wow. Ok.

CJ



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 02:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by waypastvne
 


We need to send inspectors in if they are not hiding anything, to make sure that all the cameras are accounted for.


Will these be Truth Inspectors ? Do you think you can find any that can count ?

Do you have any other camera positions that you want added to the map ?



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 02:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mickles
But there are more cameras on the pentagon than any other building so surely more conclusive footage should have been released?


Give us their positions, I'll add them to the aerial photo.



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 05:09 PM
link   
reply to post by waypastvne
 


Yes these will be truth inspectors, but we won't have the full count until they go in.



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 05:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Juanxlink
 


One - the bottom 2 floors of the Pentagon have no internal walls between the rings. Once it punched through
the exterior E Ring would encounter no substanial objects except for some support columns until exiting
at the C Ring wall into the anterior roadway


On the first and second floors, the Pentagon has continuous interior space extending from the facade to the inner-facing wall of the C-Ring, joining the C-, D-, and E-Rings. This is because the light wells between the C- and D-Rings and between the D- and E-Rings only descend to the bottom of the third floor. The only structural elements interrupting this space are columns apparently spaced on 10-foot centers along the direction perpendicular to the facade, with each first-floor column having a square cross-section measuring 21 inches on a side.


You ask why the "titanium engines" were not found .....

They were

Check out this link which shows the engine parts recovered from Pentagon and matches them with engines
used in that model Boeing 757

www.aerospaceweb.org...

You lose....



posted on Jun, 5 2012 @ 06:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by waypastvne
 


Yes these will be truth inspectors, but we won't have the full count until they go in.


So you don't know where the cameras that you are demanding videos from are located ?

Can you give us an approximate number of how many videos you think are missing ?

Did you know that a lot of the videos that the FBI confiscated are now up for view directly on their website.


edit on 5-6-2012 by waypastvne because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
7
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join