It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The moment Hurricane Irene was sweeping through New York, Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul was calling for additional spending cuts before funding disaster relief.
The Texas congressman doubled down comments he made Friday that the nation was better off in the 1900s, before the existence of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
“Congressman, you would really at this point, do away with FEMA and all the things it’s doing to help hundreds of thousands of people along the East Coast?” Fox News Chris Wallace asked Paul.
“Have you ever read the reports that came out of New Orleans [after Hurricane Katrina]?” Paul laughed. “It’s a system of bureaucratic central economic planning, which is a policy that is deeply flawed.”
“So, no. You don’t get rid of something like that in one day… I propose we save a billion dollars from overseas war mongering, bring half of that home, put it against the deficit and yes, tide people over until we come to our senses and realize that FEMA has been around since 1978. It has one of the worst reputations for a bureaucracy ever.”
Originally posted by HauntWok
Soo, let's see if I get this straight.
The messiah of the TEA Party is saying that if you are in a natural disaster, he wants to give you the finger. Basically it's your fault for being in a natural disaster and to bad so sad.
And you all want to make this guy president? Remember this if some horrible act of god happens to you. The guy that you stump for, and prey to, and worship like a god, will if elected, not help you out in any way shape or form.
Not saying that FEMA is perfect, we all know they have problems in that organization, but I think it would be far worse if State governments were required to handle any disasters that happen to come along.
What happens if you all get your wish and there's 0% federal funding for anything and 0% tax and the state has to pick up the check for everything? Are you all going to start complaining that state tax is too high? It sure as hell will be if there's a natural disaster and there's no federal help coming your way. I can imagine property and state taxes go through the roof.
Originally posted by HauntWok
Soo, let's see if I get this straight.
The messiah of the TEA Party is saying that if you are in a natural disaster, he wants to give you the finger. Basically it's your fault for being in a natural disaster and to bad so sad.
And you all want to make this guy president? Remember this if some horrible act of god happens to you. The guy that you stump for, and prey to, and worship like a god, will if elected, not help you out in any way shape or form.
Not saying that FEMA is perfect, we all know they have problems in that organization, but I think it would be far worse if State governments were required to handle any disasters that happen to come along.
What happens if you all get your wish and there's 0% federal funding for anything and 0% tax and the state has to pick up the check for everything? Are you all going to start complaining that state tax is too high? It sure as hell will be if there's a natural disaster and there's no federal help coming your way. I can imagine property and state taxes go through the roof.