It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
from the Washington Post
William Ferris was confined to a bed in a military hospital, his severed sciatic nerve reminding him of the attack on his Navy Swift boat in a Vietnamese river. A shot from a recoilless rifle had pierced the boat's pilothouse and then Ferris's body, leaving him in constant agony.
But it was what appeared on Ferris's television that really pained him. John F. Kerry, a decorated fellow Swift boat driver, was testifying before Congress about atrocities in Vietnam, throwing his medals away, speaking at antiwar rallies. Ferris, who was trying to rehabilitate himself back to active duty, felt betrayed.
"I was livid," Ferris, 57, of Long Island, N.Y., said yesterday, recalling how his dislike for the presidential candidate began in the early 1970s. "I said to myself at the time, this is someone who is using his experience for his own purposes, and this was long before he ever ran for office. I thought he was using, actually manipulating, what he had done in Vietnam. Just like he's doing now."
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
I mentioned this before, and here is an article proving it. The veterans are not so much concerned with what Kerry did during the war, it's what he did afterwards.
Washington Post Article
Senator Kerry Can Address the Substance of the Swift Vet Charges With a Form 180
Dear Senator Kerry:
Please sign the Pentagon's Standard Form 180 immediately if you are truly interested in refuting the Swift Boat Vet's charges.
If you are in fact telling the truth about your service in Vietnam, you can simply fill out a Form 180 and assure that your military records are fully public. Total transparency would help voters decide if you should become commander in chief.
You could vindicate yourself, and refute the charges of the Swift Boat Veterans, by releasing the rest of your record. If the accounts of events in your complete record refute the Swiftees charges, that would work to your advantage.
Please be brave and show America that you have nothing to hide -- sign the Pentagon's Standard Form 180 and get your side of the story out today!
Sincerely,
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Originally posted by Phoenix
1. Kerry campaign aknowedges he was NOT in Cambodia as he said.
2. Nixon was not yet president at the time of the supposed event.
3. The Khmer Rouge did not exist at the time of the supposed event.
Raise Your Democratic Voice! President Bush has ordered his most loyal and partisan supporters to contact their Senators and Representatives in Congress to pressure them to pass his irresponsible tax giveaway.
It's time to fight back.
The Democratic Party is partnering with MoveOn.org, People for the American Way, Campaign for America's Future, and dozens of other groups representing millions of Americans to organize a massive public mobilization. On Wednesday, May 14, join us by calling and emailing your representatives in Congress to let them know that the majority of Americans oppose more irresponsible tax cuts that go overwhelmingly to the wealthiest sliver of Americans.
Founded in 2001 under the leadership of Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe, and led by National Chair Ann Lewis, the DNC Women's Vote Center is dedicated to educating, engaging, and mobilizing women voters across the nation to help elect more Democrats to office at all levels of government.
The East Bay for Kerry/MoveOn House party on December 7th combined the forces of two grass-roots organizations based in San Francisco East Bay Area. We had 200 guests eating, drinking, and watching the MoveOn Documentary �Uncovered� featuring Joseph Wilson and Rand Beers from the Kerry campaign.
Originally posted by Phoenix
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
I mentioned this before, and here is an article proving it. The veterans are not so much concerned with what Kerry did during the war, it's what he did afterwards.
Washington Post Article
This is no revelation, anybody who has actually bothered to read the SBVT book and knows that nearly 1/3 of it is devoted to Kerrys after war activities - THIS IS NOT a new tack or direction For SBVT
The WAPO article is just trying to spin this as a way to misdirect the debate.
Originally posted by marg6043
Why somebody will feel outraged about talking of the horrors of war, my father is a veteran and he talks about it.
Originally posted by RANT
Slandering is just sad LadyV. And DTOM you're right it could backfire on Kerry if he can't prove Bush is directing SwiftVets, but the assumption that Kerry is directing MoveOn or that Move On IN ANY WAY is as disreputable as SwiftVets I question.
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
But all the people I knew who have been in various wars do NOT talk about it, AT ALL. My father, my uncle ( who was in the Battle of the Buldge) and various friends were mum on the subject. Some of the Viet vets I knew would not even go to the Viet-movies, such as Platoon
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
But all the people I knew who have been in various wars do NOT talk about it, AT ALL. My father, my uncle ( who was in the Battle of the Buldge) and various friends were mum on the subject. Some of the Viet vets I knew would not even go to the Viet-movies, such as Platoon