reply to post by TinfoilTP
Wow, I provided the proof and then you ask for it again. The Newsletter. It would be used by the Obama team. Focusing on attacking me won't change the
cards that are out there on the table.
Ron Paul never explained the Newsletter. He said no, then he said yes, then he said it was a ghostwriter and that he knowingly lied previously from
advise he took from his campaign advisers. His chronology.
You're lying, he says that he did not write it, he does not know who wrote it, and
says that racism goes against his Constitutional views and everybody who knows him knows he would not write that because it is nothing like his
mentality. Where did you see him say "no", then "yes" about writing it?
Can you actually convince yourself that the presidential candidate who is so committed to following the Constitution would completely ignore the "all
men are created equal" part of the Declaration of Independence and be a secret racist? Even if that slanderous trash you are posting was true, what
would he do as president? Would he bring back slavery? Would he deport all black people Africa?
At worst he supported racism in his newsletter, midrange bad his negligence in running the newsletter allowed it to happen, at best he is an
admitted liar from his explanation. None of those speak positively about his character.
"Supported racism", how? Did he publically endorse
that article? Did he say "I did not write it, but I agree with the message"? No, he didn't support it, that's just another pathetic attempt of yours
to slander Ron Paul.
In the end it has been four years since the last time he was challenged on the issue and he nor his team ever supplied the guilty party who
really wrote them if it wasn't him. He doesn't seem to care to try to clear his name diffinitively.
He doesn't know who wrote it, and doesn't
want to give it the attention that it doesn't deserve because it's such a non-issue.
But to you, it's a HUGE deal, because it speaks about his "character"! Because you know, a guy with a 30 year long, perfectly consistent voting record
who has always been about following the Constitution and protecting Americans liberties is a closet racist who one day wanted to vent his hatred on a
newsletter, and then deny writing it for the rest of his life
Again my point is, Obama's team would slay Ron Paul with his own Newsletter. They have a history of shouting racism against opposition and
winning. He is a flawed candidate, damaged goods.
How is he flawed, because of what somebody else wrote? Give that garbage a rest dude, that
is such an irrelevant piece of history, and I am struggling to understand why you see it as the factor which people should judge Ron Pauls
presidential candidacy on.
I say you're either a paid internet shill, or somebody who hates their Constitutional rights, loves a big federal government, loves having a private
bank handle our money, loves fighting trillion dollar wars at the taxpayer expense, loves thumping others with a Bible, and loves trying to discredit
Ron Paul by pitifully posting whatever propaganda you can dig up, and spinning it to look like a HUGE deal that we should all judge him and not elect
him based on.
Personally I think the Ron Paul campaign will fall apart long before this issue would ever be used. As a third party candidate he will be
mostly ignored by the media. Once the GOP nominates someone else he will go back to obscurity.
And when that happens, our Constitutional
rights will also "go back to obscurity".
Despite multiple requests, you still have not told us what issues you disagree with Ron Paul on, and what candidate you will vote for and why we
should vote for them instead of him.
Tell me, what do you do when you're not posting propaganda on internet forums?
edit on 22-8-2011 by TupacShakur because: To edit my