It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
reply to post by TinfoilTP
I love how because you can't dig up any dirt on him you have to pull this 'racism card' again. He didn't write it, it was apart of Ron Paul Newsletters in which he would submit the occasional piece. He didn't even know what was written in the article until 10 years later when he ran for congress and the media brought it up to attack him. Right now you're just making things up with no proof trying to discredit Ron Paul like you've always been.
Here is Nelson Linder, NAACP District leader in Austin Texas in an interview backing Ron Paul that he is NOT a racist.
www.youtube.com...
Ron Paul himself on this particular subject, not like you'd believe it since you're trolling.
www.youtube.com...
You'd think of 30 years being in the public light a true racist would show himself. One incident taken completely out of context proves you're a racist? lol you're foolin yourself boy.
TinFoilTP quit trolling and look for facts, not pre-made clipped videos put together for conveniently attacking those you already don't like.
edit on 20-8-2011 by eLPresidente because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
The Ron Paul Newsletters were not only Ron Paul's his family made money from it.
This is the most glaring set of facts and evidence pertinent to his character out there.
When some supporter such as yourself comes along and downplays them to the point that other people will think they will be a non issue, it is doing a diservice to any voter unfamiliar with the game of politics, and that makes up a very large portion of Ron Paul supporters. Kids who just got their voting cards and wheened off momma's breast ready to throw their votes down the proverbial toilet.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
In commanding fashion, and as everyone expected, Ron Paul won the first-ever ATS Republican Straw poll with a staggering 83.2% of the 17,783 votes (12,865 from non-members) received in 48 hours.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
reply to post by TinfoilTP
Now you're just getting desperate, I pulled apart your argument that he was a racist and gave you several examples of how he isn't. You couldn't debate any of my points so you try to attack me and change the topic and misdirect your failures.
You have a history of attacking Ron Paul and when people actually stand up to point out your empty accusations you back down because you have no proof other than things taken out of context.
I know it is hard to attack Ron Paul's character...I know...
TinFoilTP, you accused Ron Paul of being a racist, please provide proof or you're just straight up trolling. So I wonder, what is your next post going to say?edit on 21-8-2011 by eLPresidente because: (no reason given)
You're lying, he says that he did not write it, he does not know who wrote it, and says that racism goes against his Constitutional views and everybody who knows him knows he would not write that because it is nothing like his mentality. Where did you see him say "no", then "yes" about writing it?
Wow, I provided the proof and then you ask for it again. The Newsletter. It would be used by the Obama team. Focusing on attacking me won't change the cards that are out there on the table.
Ron Paul never explained the Newsletter. He said no, then he said yes, then he said it was a ghostwriter and that he knowingly lied previously from advise he took from his campaign advisers. His chronology.
"Supported racism", how? Did he publically endorse that article? Did he say "I did not write it, but I agree with the message"? No, he didn't support it, that's just another pathetic attempt of yours to slander Ron Paul.
At worst he supported racism in his newsletter, midrange bad his negligence in running the newsletter allowed it to happen, at best he is an admitted liar from his explanation. None of those speak positively about his character.
He doesn't know who wrote it, and doesn't want to give it the attention that it doesn't deserve because it's such a non-issue.
In the end it has been four years since the last time he was challenged on the issue and he nor his team ever supplied the guilty party who really wrote them if it wasn't him. He doesn't seem to care to try to clear his name diffinitively.
How is he flawed, because of what somebody else wrote? Give that garbage a rest dude, that is such an irrelevant piece of history, and I am struggling to understand why you see it as the factor which people should judge Ron Pauls presidential candidacy on.
Again my point is, Obama's team would slay Ron Paul with his own Newsletter. They have a history of shouting racism against opposition and winning. He is a flawed candidate, damaged goods.
And when that happens, our Constitutional rights will also "go back to obscurity".
Personally I think the Ron Paul campaign will fall apart long before this issue would ever be used. As a third party candidate he will be mostly ignored by the media. Once the GOP nominates someone else he will go back to obscurity.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
reply to post by TinfoilTP
Don't forget, this 76 year old congressman has tons of fans all across the world.
Originally posted by xavi1000
Ohoooo , hi TinfoilTP ...you are very active against Ron Paul as i was expecting ..it was a long summer ... RP is exploding and you are nervous ....you love wars,you love big goverment,you love death ...you love everything RP is opposing.RP will change the history and you will be buried with that history you imperialistic warlover.
Despite multiple requests, you still have not told us what issues you disagree with Ron Paul on, and what candidate you will vote for and why we should vote for them instead of him.