A question for believers or 'OSers'....

Originally posted by ShaunHatfield
reply to post by Yankee451

 

So you don't have an answer? Typical... A truther might as well be a web bot, designed to intake information from any site with the words 9/11 and truth in it.

You can't even answer a specific question, yet you act as though everyone should entertain your questions...

Don't bother answering my question... I don't know why it took me so long to figure out, I don't care what you think... You and I both know, the main problem is lack of thinking... Dream on little dreamer

Care to answer my question?

Its inconceivable to think any human can physically show, think or believe how an ALUMINUM frame jet carrying 22,000 gallons of fuel can pulverize 500,000 tons of steel and concrete. its beyond crazy.

reply to post by dilly1


Its enough fuel to fill a couple above ground pools, but it managed to wipe out three skyscrapers and the rest of the world trade center.

We are the most lied-to people in the history of the world.

Apocalypse NOW! FFS!

reply to post by dilly1

If planes were such a hindrance to steel man made structures ,,,then the Japanese should have won the Pacific during world war 2. Not one Kamikaze attack sunk a US carrier(or auxiliary ships) nor derailed the US carrier primary mission do to a kamikaze attack. And kamikaze planes had bombs too and our carriers kept on going. (Look it up)

You are not only ignorant about 9/11, but Worls War II also...

While did not sink a large fleet carrier wasnt for lack of trying

Reference USS BUNKER HILL which lost 400 men to kamikaze attack

en.wikipedia.org...:CV09_Essex_USG-80-G-273032-.jpg

Or escort carriers

USS ST LO , BISMARK SEA

en.wikipedia.org...:SL_Exp_5.jpg

How about the Battle of Okinawa where US navy lost over 30 ships sunk and more than 300 damaged by
Kamikaze

Maybe should ask a veteran what he thought of the KamikazeS? I've talked to a few WW!! vets including our
towns retired fire chief - he told of entering burning LST to fight the fiires after kamikaze hit ...

Originally posted by dillweed
reply to post by Yankee451

 

Well said. 'They' are all as phony as a three dollar bill, and this latest thread illustates brilliantly just how pathetic they've become. When someone questions any aspect of the OS they immediately blurt out "where's your proof?". That's ironic isn't it, when that's precisely what we've been asking for, for ten years. If they worked for me, I'd fire the whole bunch for incompetence. After all that's been discovered relating to 9/11, and you take the position that Arabs with boxcutters were responsible for the events of that day, you are either on their payroll or you are retarded, and in some cases both.

So, if someone asks questions and wants proof of what you preach they are, as you put it, retarded? This is extremely hateful. or they must be a DHS/CIA/FBI disinfo agent. I think it is time to up the mg's.

There have been multiple investigations into the events of 9/11, which provides the proof you ask for, but disregard it because it does not fit your theory,idea,notion,thought or what ever you want to call your belief that there were explosives used on 9/11 or else the towers would never have come down claiming physics were suspended that day. That a missile struck the Pentagon even though 1000's of eyewitnesses saw a plane. Are they all retarded also?

Any one of these threads can and will end with one question...where is the proof of explosives? Physical proof and not dust chips or air. 2 110 story buildings collapse and there is nothing....think about it.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWAHAHAHAHAHA ... Ok picking myself up now.. I will share the humor with the world.

Lets play guess who said this:

Two missiles at glancing blows and maybe one right up the middle. That's my story.

Click here to read fantasy


Ok, it wasn't a hologram, it was 2 missiles.... right right... So we saw CGI planes on Teevee? ... right right...



Story:

Your buddy comes up to you one day... He tells you he thinks everyone is lying to him.. He goes on to say that things we think we see on teevee aren't real... they are CGI/ holograms.

Do you
a) Call the appropriate medical dept.
b) Tell his parents you think something in the basement is affecting his sanity
c) Attempt to explain to him, that his paranoia is getting out of control
d) take away his WOW and dungeons and dragons, due to the loss of sanity
e) ALL OF THE ABOVE..

You see, I did care, then realized after getting an answer, I really didn't.

Have a good day sir, you and I could never have a rational conversation... ever.

reply to post by esdad71


Actually, I'd like to see the proof of the crime.

No bodies, the murder weapon was never forensically tied to the alleged crime, and the evidence was disposed of before it could be analyzed. But trust us, they say.

reply to post by ShaunHatfield


Actually, I've revised it. The evidence supports multiple missiles fired in a cross-fire formation to form the "impact hole" of the north tower.

I invite you to the updated site. I'm sure you won't ever show your face there though, you only know how to deride, not debate.

letsrollforums.com...

Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by TupacShakur

 

planes hit the twin towers and thousands saw it. I don't think that's really up for debate, and I've always thought that the hologram theory was used to discredit the 9/11 truth movement and make us all sound insane.

I don't buy the hologram hypothesis, and I have found it is used to discredit no planes hypotheses by lumping us all together.

But I also don't buy thousands saw it. They saw it on TV, just like the rest of us. There are plenty of people who claim otherwise:

I DIDN'T SEE THE PLANE HIT,ALTHOUGH I WAS LOOKING AT THE TOWER AT

We didn't know what had happened because we didn't
see the plane, because it was so fast. Whenever I did figure out what
happened I got this weird feeling across my body that I can't describe..."

From an amateur camera clip, camera positioned on both towers:
"...we just saw another explosion (TV comment)...."
Person 1 in room: "...Another explosion Kate..."
Kate: "...i know, i know..." (noone of both refered to any plane)
www.911closeup.com...

You really are totally DELUDED in that clip above the South Tower wasn't in the field of view of the camera at impact!!!!!

reply to post by kaya82


Page 10, 3rd post from the bottom, this thread.

reply to post by wmd_2008


Dear readers.

Do you see a pattern here?

All of the OS faithful spend most of their time ridiculing. Go back over this thread...look at the constant mocking.

Think for a moment how the truth would be treated if someone did stumble upon it.

Would they be ignored? Ridiculed?

I'm not saying my hypotheses are correct, but I am saying that if they were correct, this is the sort of treatment I"d expect to receive. I guess I might be on the right track.

reply to post by esdad71
Could you clarify that a bit? What 'multiple investigations providing proof' have I missed? Besides, there are'nt enough milligrams to treat the likes of me. Truth is the only remedy for what troubles me. That's something you obviously know very little about.

reply to post by dilly1


And it didnt have to "pulverize" it to make the building come down. Just disrupt the integrity of the buildings.

reply to post by Yankee451


Have you completely lost your mind? I can see saying this joking around with friends... But to invest a substantial amount of time, is beyond absurd.

Were these invisible missiles? Were these invisible explosions? Nobody saw these missiles? What were the planes we all saw? What were they fired from?

How can you make such a leap in logic?

There is so much wrong with this theory, that I would have to assume that no logical person with a "full deck" would really believe this.

The fact that someone believes, that 2 missiles hit the WTC, is proof that the gene pool has been compromised.

reply to post by ShaunHatfield


Naudet was in place to stage the first impact shot, as proven by Leslie Raphael, linked to in my 911 for Psychos thread.

Raphael is not a no planer, and he proved the shot was staged.

If Naudet was in place to stage the first strike, he was in place to take video BEFORE the first strike, making it an easy thing to use layering techniques to make a composite video sans missiles.

I invite you to 911 for Psychos for the link to Raphael's work, and the work of others.

reply to post by plube

i did say that he had called for a structural Engineer.....after seeing the damage on the 78 floor lift shaft......do you not ask yourself why.....cause i certainly do....to me it would mean the integrity of the central core was comprimized

And since the people that were IN those areas of the building at the time of impact told us, that in one Tower, all three stairwells were blocked and in the other two of them, from the impact area UP. We KNOW that the core was compromised. And we ALSO know that since NONE of those people showed injuries consistant with being exposed to the shockwave from an explosion (as a result of a chemical explosive i.e. C-4, Semtex, TNT etc) we know that there were not any bombs in place in the impact areas either. (cue the silly thermite claims)

Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by wmd_2008

 

Dear readers.

Do you see a pattern here?

All of the OS faithful spend most of their time ridiculing. Go back over this thread...look at the constant mocking.

Think for a moment how the truth would be treated if someone did stumble upon it.

Would they be ignored? Ridiculed?

I'm not saying my hypotheses are correct, but I am saying that if they were correct, this is the sort of treatment I"d expect to receive. I guess I might be on the right track.

Well answer this WAS THE SOUTH TOWER in the field of view at impact simple question?
You want to debate so what's answer.

Now I reckon you will try to ignore this although its obvious that the tower wasn't in view at the moment of impact anyone watching the video can see that, so what will they think of you and your ideas!

reply to post by wmd_2008


Videos can be faked, and witnesses can lie, but planes cannot disappear into buildings like hot knives through butter, no matter how much you sputter.

reply to post by dillweed


Let's start with PENTTBOM. Are they all in on it? All of the people that work for or were interviewed. This was a criminal investigation and why certain pieces of evidence were not allowed under the FOIA till trials were over.It was and is the largest criminal investigation in the history of the US. This is a start. Use FOIA to get what you want now. Most truther sites still hold out dated video. Lots of new video has been released in just the last year or so.

www.washingtonpost.com...

There is also the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. It is actually a very good read and what you take away is why no one lost their job after 9/11. No one. If you read it, is tells you that the FBI and CIA let down not only GW2 but Clinton in being provided accurate information to make decisions that could have affected 9/11. It does not exonerate anyone but it is shown as that plenty in these forums because it is easier to dismiss than research.

If you want a conspriacy, look into the NORAD tapes, Cheney and Mineta. There is your smoking gun. The WTC is disinfo to keep strong minds from what is really hidden in plain sight.

Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by dilly1

 

And it didnt have to "pulverize" it to make the building come down. Just disrupt the integrity of the buildings.

But it was pulverized . You say "just to disrupt the integrity of the buildings" ,then why so many small pieces(and I mean small enough to conveniently be hauled away in such a short amount of time ).

Educate your self on how things collapse with the idea of "disrupt integrity" that are natural and artificial. Big freaken difference. Your in denial.



Ps- and that short amount of time ,I meant in 8 months of cleaning ground zero.. Which is extremely convenient freaken fast for 1,200,000(including WTC7) tons of steel and concrete