It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yes COP, it is a crime to film LEO's in Mass, however, hiding being the law like that is nothing but cowardice. I started reading this thread waiting to see your insane posting and you didnt fail me. Its also a crime to steal and kidnap people, but im sure you find a way to do it everyday. I stand firm, the only people who are cops are sociopaths, any normal person couldn't stomach the filth that is the modern LEO.
Originally posted by kro32
Has anyone bothered to see if there is a law about this? You can yell for snipers all day but if there is a law and this individual broke it than the police officer has a right to file charges.
Complaing on a website won't change that fact in a court so if it bothers you than move to the State and petition to have the law changed.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by NuroSlam
It is not a crime to film cops there. You have been misinformed.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Wow. You're way off mark. You can record a cop to your hearts content without any permissions from them. You should perhaps look this stuff up
Because federal law permits the recording of in-person conversations with the consent of only one of the parties (see 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d)), it's likely the officer had instead meant to cite state law. The Massachusetts wiretapping statute, MGL Ch. 272 § 99, makes it a crime to secretly record an in-person conversation without the consent of all parties to the conversation. Because the statute only addresses secret recordings, those made with a camera in plain sight fall outside the restriction. A 2001 decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court made clear that recording police openly does not violate the wiretapping law, and lower courts consistently have recognized that exception. Still, Massachusetts police are charging individuals under the statute despite their cameras being in what most would agree is plain view.
Damon's camera was secured to the side of his helmet. "I said that I was not being secretive since the camera [was] in plain view, right next to my face," Damon said."He demanded that I turn off the camera and hand it to him so he could hold it as evidence." The officer, he said, “continued to talk to me about how serious a crime I had committed with the camera.”
A Massachusetts man is facing five years in prison after secretly recording an argument between himself and a police officer who had pulled him over for a traffic infraction.
Robert E. Mansfield was charged with felony wiretapping after he walked into the police station asking police to rescind the citation for having an obstructed license plate because of a tinted cover.
The Massachusetts wiretapping statute, MGL Ch. 272 § 99, makes it a crime to secretly record an in-person...
Originally posted by PsykoOps
The Massachusetts wiretapping statute, MGL Ch. 272 § 99, makes it a crime to secretly record an in-person...
Does not apply if you're in public and there is no expectation of privacy. Illinois is the only state that hasn't decided this to be the case. That is currently being fought on federal level. Also a protip: just because cops arrest you for something doesn't mean that you have done anything wrong.
Originally posted by cripmeister
They? One officer, Michael Sedergren, has decided to file charges against the woman videotaping.
Originally posted by NuroSlam
Originally posted by PsykoOps
The Massachusetts wiretapping statute, MGL Ch. 272 § 99, makes it a crime to secretly record an in-person...
Does not apply if you're in public and there is no expectation of privacy. Illinois is the only state that hasn't decided this to be the case. That is currently being fought on federal level. Also a protip: just because cops arrest you for something doesn't mean that you have done anything wrong.
Tell that to the person who gets arrested, sits in jail, goes to court, and has a permanent arrest record.
Not to mention passing over the second example.edit on 17-8-2011 by NuroSlam because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by NuroSlam
Originally posted by PsykoOps
The Massachusetts wiretapping statute, MGL Ch. 272 § 99, makes it a crime to secretly record an in-person...
Does not apply if you're in public and there is no expectation of privacy. Illinois is the only state that hasn't decided this to be the case. That is currently being fought on federal level. Also a protip: just because cops arrest you for something doesn't mean that you have done anything wrong.
Tell that to the person who gets arrested, sits in jail, goes to court, and has a permanent arrest record.
Not to mention passing over the second example.edit on 17-8-2011 by NuroSlam because: (no reason given)
Both your examples contained a very specific stipulation.
"secretly."
Hopefully that helps.