It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LadyV
I have learned a lot here.......but I don't really understand in our modern time, why it's an all male club, but I don't really care either...I just find it puzzling.
Originally posted by RANT
Actually, it was strictly in the anatomical sense I used the word "penis" as that is the defining factor it seems that forbids LadyV from joining anything but an offshoot of the fraternal order of Freemasonry.
Originally posted by AlexKennedy
Originally posted by LadyV
I have learned a lot here.......but I don't really understand in our modern time, why it's an all male club, but I don't really care either...I just find it puzzling.
Why? You're a Wiccan -- have you ever heard of Dianic Wicca? It's all women, after all... does that make it bad?
How about the National Organisation of Women?
How about the "W" channel for women? (I don't know if you have that down in the states... it's up here in Canada?)
How about sororities on college campuses?
Is it OK to have women-only societies, but not men-only societies?
Originally posted by AlexKennedy
Originally posted by Jamuhn
So, I was curious about the inclusion Thoth's supposed works in Masonry, because it seems that the pyramid thing comes from somewhere...
What pyramid thing? Sorry, Jamuhn, but can you blame me for being irritated when you repeatedly refer to things you "know" about Freemasonry that aren't actually, you know, true?
I agree with this!!!
Another reason would be people dislike what they don't know, almost as jealousy. They feel they are excluded and react negatively.
I mean, can you blame people? Plus, there's a difference between fearing something and staying away from it and being excluded by not meeting certain expectations.
So, wait, are you saying there's something wrong with the requirements of being a Freemason, namely a belief in a supreme being and upright morals? So no society has a right to determine who can and cannot become a member?
the pyramid appears in the ritual as a representation of the great builders of the past
Originally posted by LadyV
I also don't feel in the year 2004 there are needs to have male female segregation.
Originally posted by AlexKennedy
Originally posted by LadyV
I also don't feel in the year 2004 there are needs to have male female segregation.
-- I think time for male bonding (or female bonding) is a good thing.
[edit on 18-8-2004 by AlexKennedy]
Originally posted by Jamuhn
Well, it seems Alex Kennedy that I was right about Hermes Trismegistus.
the pyramid appears in the ritual as a representation of the great builders of the past
www.masonicinfo.com...
What is wrong with you man, all of a sudden you are trolling this board and flaming everyone who isn't a Mason.
And to your second statement, I was talking in a general sense. And even if I was, what of it? I am no more of an authority on what is "right" than you are. *Mockingly*So, wait, I don't have a right to question the requirements of masonry.
And I think what RANT was talking about was the fact that Masonry has to set up a seperate organization from its own for women and then call it equal, you know, like segregation.
Originally posted by AlexKennedy
As I said before, I've never encountered any reference to a pyramid anywhere in any ritual I've encountered. Certainly not in Craft Lodge. And I stand by that. I don't know what Ed King is talking about there... it's weird.
Originally posted by Jamuhn
But, I wish you or another Mason would take my comments seriously and let me know if there is any more specific mention of Egyptian mysticism in the teachings.
Originally posted by LadyV
I do respectfully disagree however, I think it's time for human kind to bond together un segregated.
Originally posted by Jamuhn
I didn't say American segregationalism....I said segregation, seperate but equal. In fact, in of your above posts, you said segregation as well. EDIT: Never mind, it's not there anymore.
Umm... I haven't edited any of my posts to remove anything, so if it's not there now, it never was.
I would let women and non-believers of God in my secret club, it would foster more diversity of opinion IMO.
Several problems here:
i) First, we're not talking about a "secret club." Masonry is not a social club nor is it a civic club. It is a fraternity, bound by what is sometimes referred to as a "mystic tie." Its teachings are sacremental inasmuch as they speak to man's relationship with God (although they are not religious, as they do not inculcate any specific religious dogma). What would be the point of atheists joining such an organisation? Do many atheists want to understand their relationship with God better?
ii) Second, Masonry isn't yours. Nor is it mine. Nor is it even the Grand Master's. Masonry is a set of traditions, rituals, rules, etc. If you change those rituals and traditions in a violent way, then it's not Masonry anymore. If you're so eager to have a "secret club" that allows in atheists, why don't you make one? For goodness sake, it's not very hard, and I promise you I won't make fun.
Because we are all after all, just making assumptions about philosophy and religion and spirituality.
Sorry, no. I mean no offense to atheists, and I certainly don't deny them the right to believe (or disbelieve) as they wish, but as far as I'm concerned, I know God exists. Now, when we talk about religious doctrines, I agree, we are maybe not making assumptions, but certainly none, or few of us have perfect knowledge.
LOL.....yeah pretty typical, someone mentions something and someone else grabs it and so on and so on and so on ............
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Has anyone else ever noticed that once a thread reaches about 3 pages, it usually goes off topic?
Originally posted by Masonic Light
unless one includes the Egyptian Rite of Memphis and Oriental Rite of Mitzraim, both of which have been tabled by regular Masonry.
Originally posted by AlexKennedy
Originally posted by Jamuhn
But, I wish you or another Mason would take my comments seriously and let me know if there is any more specific mention of Egyptian mysticism in the teachings.
Boy oh boy, I'd be yelling this if we were face-to-face...
I have told you several times that no, there is no specific mention of Egyptian mysticism in the first three degrees. There is one brief mention of Egypt in one of the lectures... but the gist of the explanation is that Masonry is heiroglyphic, i.e. symbolic, and meant to be interpreted. There is NO FURTHER MENTION of Egypt or Egyptian mysticism.
Now, I'm not saying that the study of the Ancient Egyptian religions is not a good direction of study for the Mason -- on the contrary, I think it is an excellent thing to study. But the ritual does not mention it.
Originally posted by Khonsu
As ML and AK have both stated there are really no connections in our degrees to Egypt or ancient Kemet. Yet many Masons such as myself have long felt there is a connection of some sort to the mystery systems of Kemet, and have gone through great lenghts to prove them.