THIS WAS IN JEST....geese, its ok for you to call me names on multiple threads, (ive never seen your apology, i re-looked) yet when i take a poke at
you you go off the deep end....
feels good to get picked on doesnt it? Perhaps now you'll consider how it feels to have someone take cheap shots at you before you launch into
ridiculing them. You shouldnt let yourself be manipulated with words so easily, and your lack of self control is amusing. You presume to speak FOR
me? Why cant I presume to question if you would support NAMBLA?
(exact wording was MABEY, not that you did) The inferance that you DID or DID NOT was yours to make. Why didnt you infer that DID NOT was the
Im sorry if my words injured you in any way. (Sticks and stones?)
As to the rest of you...DO YOU ACTUALLY READ WHATS PRINTED OR ONLY WHAT YOU WANT TO SEE?
I was in no way endorsing NAMBLA. Except for the poke twords 27jd,
I qualified that NOONE would agree with their adgenda.
Oh but i guess you didnt READ that, only saw what you wanted to see there. Typical.
IN NO WAY DID I EVER IMPLY THAT GAYS AND NAMBLA HAD ANY RELATION OR EQUITY!!!!!!!!! Again, what kind of erronius LEAP from one brain cell to the
other mangled this idea into being? Just the TERM NAMBLA, on any gay thread makes you blind to WHAT is being said, not what you THINK is being said.
Predictable, easy to manipulate, and thanks for all the POINTS for allowing yourselves to be duped into a rant instead of actually looking at what
was being said about the ISSUE.
My EXAMPLE was supposed to show an unfavored minority special intrest group (one with no questions as to being unfavored), using subversive means to
enact their views onto the majority of the culture that wouldnt approve and has enacted laws thru the recognized deomcratic channels to prohibit such
Obviously we would all feel outrage IF NAMBLA was able to pull such a stunt...But i see why now....its more the WHAT of their position and less the
HOW they got it done that bothers you. This is just as disturbing.
Well excuse me for pointing out that DEMOCRACY is one of the founding principals in this country. ANY minority special intrest group, that can use
secret/subversive means to superimpose their "rules" upon the majority, by violating the laws and the practice of the democracy is and should be
Which minority special intrest group is next to attempt such actions?
Does it matter if id have said KKK instead of NAMBLA, or what about special intrest group A, B, C etc.....
To have allowed the gay marriaged in California to be upheld would have allowed that door to swing wide open. Our demorcacy would have been hijacked
from the majority to a select minority.
Well who selected that minority? NOT the democracy? Heck it didnt even go thru the recognised channels for enacting laws, yet you all seem so
willing to say it was FINE?
Even if you are FOR gay marriage, how can you support LIES to get it? McGreevey LIED to everyone by masquerading as a "compassionate str8" enacting
gay civil unions, yet he was secretly gay the whole time?
You all seem to think that throwing democracy out the window to get what you want for your minority group is ok,
SO i thought id test that theory by using NAMBLA in the same fashion.
You are all blinded by the WHAT of the special intrest group and not the methods used by them.
It amazes me that "bush stole the election because every vote wasnt counted" yet when the votes ARE counted in california, Its ok that a local
politician STOLE THEM ALL and tried to enact his minority position over the rest of the citizens.
How you people niether see this or understand the danger in allowing our democracy to be stolen right out from under you amazes me.
Nooo, there could never be a secret adgenda by ANY minority special interest group....yeah right.
What kind of government will special intrest group X try to install instead of democracy once they've used illegal means to get into power??
I find it amusing that mob justice rules in this thread
one pro side person recognizes a jest from another pro member
yet when a con side member jests in similar fashion, the pros rally to defense....
And you all fall together into the verbal trap. So between several of you, NOONE was able to read the point of my example thru your zeal to get the
"homophobe child molester".....laughable, i wonder how many other brain dead, follow the leader types are in the world with examples like this.
Now you know why im in the media, because soo many brains are soo open to manipulation....LMAO more brains...mmmmmm.
Amuk and james, to be clear on the off topic attempt at tying me crossthreaded...
Amuk, good point. Caz was angry about a pedo who got caught before he raped a child.
Yet on another thread he moans over the mistreatment of a childmolester who was caught before he had a chance to harm a child.
In no way shape or form do i support people convicted of sex crimes vs adults or children,
i do take exception to doling out justice in a preemptive vigilante fashion
(those that beat up a guy for j/o and peeping had no clue if this person had any convictions prior, nor did they have the right to enforce punishment
as citizens, using violence on a non violent offender)
But thats a seperat thread.
Taking the law into your own hands is no different to me that using subversive means to allow a minority special interest to hijack democratic
principals....it one and the same.
Its a violation of the cultural basis, the "glue" that we've all agreed to use to hold civilization together here.
Again people, exactly what means of governance other than democracy and the rule of law are you advocating we are using here?
Why is it ok for these basic tennants of society to be voided in order to support WHO's special interests over the culture?
[edit on 25-8-2004 by CazMedia]
[edit on 25-8-2004 by CazMedia]