It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JonoEnglish
reply to post by blupblup
Im shocked that people can't see this for what it really is.
Race card playing to give some credibility to the carnage that's gone on.
The BBC reporter wasn't being racist!
I said she was a bitch and she treated DH badly.... she spoke over him, tried putting words in his mouth, basically accused him of being a rioter/troublemaker in his day.
Originally posted by JonoEnglish
It was a live interview by a journalist with someone who was supporting the rioters.
The guy is a writer and journalist fighting a cause.
Originally posted by JonoEnglish
Originally posted by ZIPMATT
Why should an tiny child, a three year old, have to witness an execution from it's pushchair ?
I am in tears here, sorry, having a strange old day.
I'm sure the Police were thinking just that at the time.
Originally posted by JonoEnglish
reply to post by blupblup
No it's damage limitation. Nothing more.
4.4.12
News in whatever form must be treated with due impartiality, giving due weight to events, opinion and main strands of argument. The approach and tone of news stories must always reflect our editorial values, including our commitment to impartiality.
Originally posted by JonoEnglish
reply to post by blupblup
I've seen many rude interviews.
Originally posted by JonoEnglish
We don't know the full facts yet. If he came out the car with his hands on his head, then they shot him, then yeah that is wrong.
Originally posted by JonoEnglish
reply to post by ZIPMATT
without the option to shoot at him if they felt threatened?
Originally posted by ZIPMATT
reply to post by JonoEnglish
You're pre-empting anything stated by IPCC > like the other user asked you > why are you defending a newsperson the bbc had to apologise for?
Why also are you defending summary executions without trial ?
Originally posted by blupblup
Originally posted by JonoEnglish
We don't know the full facts yet. If he came out the car with his hands on his head, then they shot him, then yeah that is wrong.
I missed what you were arguing about with this other member, so you're defending the police MURDERING a man on the street too?? Are you serious?
Oh man... :shk:
You do realise he didn't shoot "his gun" right? (He probably didn't even have one)
There are eye-witness reports that he was shot while lying on the ground.
The police took 5 days to interview the mini-cab driver who was driving the man shot.
Seriously, the fact that you're defending both this and the BBC news interviewer, tells me all I need to know.
Sheesh...
I'll leave you to it while I go bang my head against a brick walledit on 10/8/11 by blupblup because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by JonoEnglish
Originally posted by ZIPMATT
reply to post by JonoEnglish
You're pre-empting anything stated by IPCC > like the other user asked you > why are you defending a newsperson the bbc had to apologise for?
Why also are you defending summary executions without trial ?
Most people are pre-empting anything stated by the IPCC. We don't know what happened.
We know a guy carrying a gun, with a known history got shot in the head and died in the street.
Are you suggesting we un-arm the armed police? Armed police will shoot people.
I don't see that interview as being bad enough to need an apology, considering the others I've seen.