posted on Aug, 8 2011 @ 05:52 PM
reply to post by openminded2011
No they didnt. Clinton was a good president. Just not a moral one. He was fiscaly conservative and knew what it took to stimulate a economy. He had
some failures. Nothing that Bush couldnt have recovered from, so no blame is needed. That is what we call accountability. Most people on the right
have it, few on the left do.
However if he did have some failures. He released multiple military secrets and technology information to China, I kind of saw this as stupid. He
decrease military spending along with intelligance agencies, in the after math, kind of a big deal since we were attacked on 9/11. Started a war in
Somalia he couldnt finish and failed at. He bombed a Aspirin factory in Libya because he thought it was chemical plant. I could go on and on, but
again, it doesnt matter. These arent acts that Bush couldnt and did recover from, and nothing he could have forseen happening. I dont blame him. I
know most Republicans dont blame him. If he wants to come back and run again, over Obama, I would vote for him. To bad he cant, but I would. I think I
would vote for the next Bum on the street over Obama though, so that might not be saying much.
edit on 8-8-2011 by kellynap43 because: (no