posted on Jul, 11 2011 @ 10:55 AM
Does anyone find it odd that it's publicized as protests, and then it's documented as attacks? To me it seems like these so called protests are
very well organized acts of terrorism.
It seems like these protestors are able to bring down nations, yet we are told they do not brandish weapons. I've seen the videos and these
protestors are clearing brandishing weapons.
I am a non-supporter of Gaddafi, yet I find it amazing that he tries to protect his country by using his resources (Military) to fight off the
"protestors". The same protestors that are brandishing weapons, burning buildings down and attacking people on the streets. Doesn't Gaddafi have
the right to protect his country? What right does NATO have to say you don't have the right to protect your country?
What if it was happening here is the U.S.? Do you think Obama would just let a group of "protestors" with weapons storm the White House, The
Capital Building and The Pentagon to seize power of the U.S.? No, I don't think so. He would position our military with the orders to use force if
necessary and stop the attack, sorry, protest.
And, when people are hurt because of their stupidity, by our military; does that give Russia and China, or any other country that is part of the
United Nations the right to attack the U.S.?
I think more time should be spent on what organization is organizing these so called "protests" and fix it before it spreads across the world.