Proof discovered. Israeli consipiracy against ATS. A website dedicated to..., page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 63 times
Topic started on 7-7-2011 @ 12:16 PM by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Folks I just found an amazing website where most of the links they are accusing are antisemitic and are sorted by a tag. The abovetopsecret tag comes up quite a few and it essentially is accusing the threads on there of being anti-Semitic and therefore indirectly ATS of being antisemitic. This is further proof that Israeli propaganda is gathering on the web to target anti-Israeli threads and label them as anti-semtitic

www.anti-semitism.net...

Although they do make this statement:


Do not assume because something is posted on our site it is Anti-Semitic.


It is clear that the links on their website indicate otherwise. Including their site name.

Which one of your threads has been the target of agents of the Israeli forces?

edit on 7-7-2011 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 7-7-2011 @ 12:44 PM by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by solargeddon




Well that will be due to the content of some of the threads on here being Anti-semetic.


That thread you mentioned was not anti-semitic. Not to mention every single thread that is mentioned on their website. Someone probably did not even bother to read the threads and just stuck them up there as part of their plan


reply posted on 7-7-2011 @ 12:47 PM by SkepticOverlord
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL



Thanks for the heads-up.

Go ahead and click any link to ATS on that site... and see what happens now.


reply posted on 7-7-2011 @ 12:50 PM by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by SkepticOverlord



Oh wow thank you so very much Haha, that is bloody brilliant.


reply posted on 7-7-2011 @ 12:51 PM by Misterlondon
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
reply to
post by THE_PROFESSIONAL



Thanks for the heads-up.

Go ahead and click any link to ATS on that site... and see what happens now.







reply posted on 7-7-2011 @ 12:54 PM by vermonster
reply to post by SkepticOverlord



lol, well played sir

well played



reply posted on 7-7-2011 @ 01:02 PM by SkepticOverlord
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL



The first message was quick-and-dirty.

I've upgraded the style to be more in line with the current design sensibilities of similar messages.

Click again.


reply posted on 7-7-2011 @ 01:03 PM by Curio
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
reply to
post by THE_PROFESSIONAL



Thanks for the heads-up.

Go ahead and click any link to ATS on that site... and see what happens now.


Excellent

Although you're clearly antisemitic for doing that


reply posted on 7-7-2011 @ 01:05 PM by Lysergic
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
reply to
post by THE_PROFESSIONAL



Thanks for the heads-up.

Go ahead and click any link to ATS on that site... and see what happens now.


epic


reply posted on 7-7-2011 @ 01:10 PM by ghondon
reply to post by SkepticOverlord


Thank you very much skepticoverlord for helping defend are right to free speech that is one of the most epic burns ever!!


reply posted on 7-7-2011 @ 01:15 PM by solargeddon
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL



It was hardly the poster boy for tollerance now was it !

It singled out Iraeli' (god I can never spell that), soldiers as being threatening to a child of another ethnic group, which for the most part, whether a threat was present was entirely debatable.



Though the general definition of antisemitism is hostility or prejudice against Jews


The above is taken from Wiki, potentially the thread was hostile to the Jewish community/ Iraeli's, and was most certainly predjudice, as the footage itself was Pro Palestine, and the OP presented it in such a fashion.

So I gues it also depends upon perspective too. I view it as Anti-semitic, you don't, however its quite clear that this thread, and the one stated do strive to single out the activities of the Iraeli's and portray them in a hostile light (after all your not exactly praising their actions are you .)

Of course after a while it all becomes a little too over sensitive for its own good, but then perhaps ATS can start its own sub website dedicated to the documentation of all the times it receives negative, and hostile feedback from others.

Point is If the owners of the website in question view content on here as being offensive to their sensibilities, and wish to document so, who are we to stop them from doing so.

By the way, why were you trawling their site in the first place ?


reply posted on 7-7-2011 @ 01:18 PM by nusnus
Theres a fine line between hostility and criticism isnt there?

However being hostile towards Israel isn't equal to being hostile toward Jews.

Originally posted by solargeddon
reply to
post by THE_PROFESSIONAL



It was hardly the poster boy for tollerance now was it !

It singled out Iraeli' (god I can never spell that), soldiers as being threatening to a child of another ethnic group, which for the most part, whether a threat was present was entirely debatable.



Though the general definition of antisemitism is hostility or prejudice against Jews


The above is taken from Wiki, potentially the thread was hostile to the Jewish community/ Iraeli's, and was most certainly predjudice, as the footage itself was Pro Palestine, and the OP presented it in such a fashion.

So I gues it also depends upon perspective too. I view it as Anti-semitic, you don't, however its quite clear that this thread, and the one stated do strive to single out the activities of the Iraeli's and portray them in a hostile light (after all your not exactly praising their actions are you .)

Of course after a while it all becomes a little too over sensitive for its own good, but then perhaps ATS can start its own sub website dedicated to the documentation of all the times it receives negative, and hostile feedback from others.

Point is If the owners of the website in question view content on here as being offensive to their sensibilities, and wish to document so, who are we to stop them from doing so.

By the way, why were you trawling their site in the first place ?



Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Are You Offended??? SO WHAT!!!
  Posted 9 days ago with 97 member flags
The Image of Baphomet: Upsetting Folks Since 1855.
  Posted 9 days ago with 39 member flags
New Scientific Report Destroys Global Warming!
  Posted 7 days ago with 32 member flags
Al Azif: Is The Necronomicon Real?
  Posted 8 days ago with 25 member flags
What The Hell Is This?
  Posted 5 days ago with 9 member flags
How copyright enforcement robots killed the Hugo Awards
  Posted 7 days ago with 4 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

My rant about my country.... England
  Rant: 7 hours ago, 42 replies
PROOF 9/11/01 was an inside job
  9/11 Conspiracies: 16 hours ago, 35 replies
I have a new Kitten....
  General Chit Chat: 15 hours ago, 26 replies