It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neo96
why dont you people starting thinking about the 74 million americans who pay no tax whatsoever before you start trying to make others pay more.
Originally posted by Hiasyouwant
It is a very very easy term to understand, and its simply "Corporate America" AKA "Capitalism". Need I say more? Say what you want about Socialism, we'd be 10x better off.
5. What has happened to tax rates in America over the last several decades?
They’ve fallen. In the early 1960s, the highest marginal income tax rate was a stunning 91 percent. That top rate fell to 70 percent after the Kennedy-Johnson tax cuts and remained there until 1981. Then Ronald Reagan slashed it to 50 percent and ultimately to 28 percent after the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Although the federal tax rate fell by more than half, total tax receipts in the 1980s doubled from $517 billion in 1981 to $1,030 billion in 1990. The top tax rate rose slightly under George H. W. Bush and then moved to 39.6 percent under Bill Clinton. But under George W. Bush it fell again to 35 percent. So what’s striking is that, even as tax rates have fallen by half over the past quarter-century, taxes paid by the wealthy have increased. Lower tax rates have made the tax system more progressive, not less so. In 1980, for example, the top 5 percent of income earners paid only 37 percent of all income taxes. Today, the top 1 percent pay that proportion, and the top 5 percent pay a whopping 57 percent.
Originally posted by cloaked4u
the buisness of the rich and ELITE will ALWAYS pass the buck on to you. so, if the rich get taxed, they pass that tax onto the products that they make and that gets passed on to you the consumer. SO, who cares. WE the LOWELY will always flip the bill. WE always have. I always loved to hear congress say they are raising taxes for the rich. The statement is so dumb. They are still taxing us poor. don't you sheeple get it.:
Originally posted by BomSquad
I think this might say it best...
This is from 2007, but the principle still applies...
5. What has happened to tax rates in America over the last several decades?
They’ve fallen. In the early 1960s, the highest marginal income tax rate was a stunning 91 percent. That top rate fell to 70 percent after the Kennedy-Johnson tax cuts and remained there until 1981. Then Ronald Reagan slashed it to 50 percent and ultimately to 28 percent after the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Although the federal tax rate fell by more than half, total tax receipts in the 1980s doubled from $517 billion in 1981 to $1,030 billion in 1990. The top tax rate rose slightly under George H. W. Bush and then moved to 39.6 percent under Bill Clinton. But under George W. Bush it fell again to 35 percent. So what’s striking is that, even as tax rates have fallen by half over the past quarter-century, taxes paid by the wealthy have increased. Lower tax rates have made the tax system more progressive, not less so. In 1980, for example, the top 5 percent of income earners paid only 37 percent of all income taxes. Today, the top 1 percent pay that proportion, and the top 5 percent pay a whopping 57 percent.
www.american.com...
Raising taxes may, in the short term, raise your tax revenue, but in the long term it stifles investment. Without investment, jobs are not created. If jobs are not created, more people collect assistance from the government. If more people collect assistance, fewer people pay taxes to pay for that assistance.
Originally posted by BomSquad
I think this might say it best...
This is from 2007, but the principle still applies...
5. What has happened to tax rates in America over the last several decades?
They’ve fallen. In the early 1960s, the highest marginal income tax rate was a stunning 91 percent. That top rate fell to 70 percent after the Kennedy-Johnson tax cuts and remained there until 1981. Then Ronald Reagan slashed it to 50 percent and ultimately to 28 percent after the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Although the federal tax rate fell by more than half, total tax receipts in the 1980s doubled from $517 billion in 1981 to $1,030 billion in 1990. The top tax rate rose slightly under George H. W. Bush and then moved to 39.6 percent under Bill Clinton. But under George W. Bush it fell again to 35 percent. So what’s striking is that, even as tax rates have fallen by half over the past quarter-century, taxes paid by the wealthy have increased. Lower tax rates have made the tax system more progressive, not less so. In 1980, for example, the top 5 percent of income earners paid only 37 percent of all income taxes. Today, the top 1 percent pay that proportion, and the top 5 percent pay a whopping 57 percent.
www.american.com...
Raising taxes may, in the short term, raise your tax revenue, but in the long term it stifles investment. Without investment, jobs are not created. If jobs are not created, more people collect assistance from the government. If more people collect assistance, fewer people pay taxes to pay for that assistance.
Originally posted by lildaddy985
reply to post by Jezus
I am actually on your side in this discussion. I was (I guess, unsuccessfully) attempting to highlight the hypocrisy of their argument. The day when it was the lazy and shiftless who were poor has long since passed. There are no success guarantees in America. There are degreed minimum wage workers everywhere.
I am also tired of hearing that millionaires work hard for their money, THEY DON'T!!! Poor people work hard. Sometimes 70 or more hours a week for 400-something dollars a week in take-home, no medical benefits, sweating (sometimes bleeding) and toiling the entire time. These people aren't stupid or lazy (many are college graduates). They are doing what they can and being productive citizens...
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
Originally posted by macman
Why does it matter?
To raise taxes is to take away from some to give to others.
If I go from say $150k a year, taxed at 40%, only to go to $300k a year and then taxed at 50%, then why move up in life? It is punishment.
Very plain and simple.
$150,000 taxed at 40% leaves you with $90,000 per year. $300,000 taxed at 50% leaves you with $150,000 per year. I would think the extra $60,000 would still be a pretty nice motivator.
Originally posted by Janky Red
reply to post by macman
It very well could be called class warfar, at this rate there will
Be billionaires and their servants. You constantly bring up the class warfare,
I think in, an attempt to paint anyone questioning your rallying
For an oligarchy, as communist??! For me there is a practical matter,
Which is the well being of Americans across the land. For thirty years America
Has pursued the conservative tax agenda. As a result this country is not doing as
Well, we work harder, longer hours and are bound by private contracts for the most
Basics of needs. The conversion of trickle down never pans out, it only goes to raise
The earnings bar for management, which is achieved by lowering the bar
For the cogs across the board. A whole lot of you are acting as defenders
Of the very oligarchy and system you claim to hate. It is not a romantic position, not
After I see what it creates in action, "freedom" seems to be pursued for the elite, I don't
Hear you brigade promoting anything but concepts that conserve the power that corrupts America.
No campaign to possibly make street vending easier, no... It is all oil wells, nuclear time bombs and
Making corporate extortion easier. Your need to condense this discussion into an issue of envy,
Why?
edit on 1-7-2011 by Janky Red because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Janky Red
reply to post by macman
It very well could be called class warfar, at this rate there will
Be billionaires and their servants. You constantly bring up the class warfare,
I think in, an attempt to paint anyone questioning your rallying
For an oligarchy, as communist??! For me there is a practical matter,
Which is the well being of Americans across the land. For thirty years America
Has pursued the conservative tax agenda. As a result this country is not doing as
Well, we work harder, longer hours and are bound by private contracts for the most
Basics of needs. The conversion of trickle down never pans out, it only goes to raise
The earnings bar for management, which is achieved by lowering the bar
For the cogs across the board. A whole lot of you are acting as defenders
Of the very oligarchy and system you claim to hate. It is not a romantic position, not
After I see what it creates in action, "freedom" seems to be pursued for the elite, I don't
Hear you brigade promoting anything but concepts that conserve the power that corrupts America.
No campaign to possibly make street vending easier, no... It is all oil wells, nuclear time bombs and
Making corporate extortion easier. Your need to condense this discussion into an issue of envy,
Why?
edit on 1-7-2011 by Janky Red because: (no reason given)
Go ahead, raise the taxes on success. It's one more reason for people to not bother trying, or to leave the USA altogether.
To raise taxes is to take away from some to give to others.
People earn it. they should do what they want with it. And it is ridiculous and selfish to think that those who have more should dish it out to those who have less.
you people and this government is not entitled to money they didnt earn.
stop with the freaking robbing hood deal.
yeah 74 millions americans are not paying there share but go after the ones who do pay.
does the us constitution mean nothing to you people you can not tax or steal from a minority to pay for the majority.
If you keep putting the tax burdens on the successful then this is going to turn into a Galt's Gulch scenario.
How does a tax on being successful make any kind of sense?
I just love that line, “The rich are greedy because they don’t want us to take their money!” Why would someone be angry that they actually worked hard and succeeded just to have a government supported by the envious masses come and take their earned wealth by force?
my biggest beef in this thread is they have no problems telling other people how much money they can have but when someone turns the table on them its a big NO you dont.