It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I think that there is one still photo where you can see a plane that clearly looks like a United paint job.
It was painted in United colors, and the markings in the pictures from the videos match the United paint scheme used in 2001.
I don't know how you could know that.
There was no program to test fly commercial aircraft remotely.
I don't know, again, how you could know that.
The commercial aircraft that were used that way (the 707 and 727) were purpose used for specific reasons. The military doesn't have a program to remotely fly commercial aircraft.
Wait another 40 years.
And my comment is if they're dying anyway, what do they care? And if they were, as so many say, true patriots, why would they care if they were killed as long as the truth got out.
Like I said to Warminindy, I would be interested to hear about this since you would be the first person to describe this to me.
I remember watching it live, and there was no doubt in my mind then, and no doubt in my mind now that it was a United plane.
Some of his coworkers at the station knew at least one crew member on that flight.
What I am saying about there not being an actual flight 175 scheduled is not something that I found out myself, but what has been presented by other researchers who supposedly discovered this themselves.
jmdewey60
reply to post by Zaphod58
Some of his coworkers at the station knew at least one crew member on that flight.
That would be the sort of thing that I would be interested in finding out more about.
The one person who I know who was familiar with one of the 911 characters, knew Mohammad Atta, since he lived right here in my area, in Sarasota County. And from what she has told me, he was right here, at least up to around 3:00 PM on the tenth, the day before 911, and acting perfectly normal and following his regular routine.edit on 21-9-2013 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
An active, in-service, United Airlines plane was not used. Again, not a theory, but what I saw on TV as mentioned above.
There was no so-called "flight 175", that just happens to be a fact. Mainstream media said that there was such a flight but that was only a cover story to explain where the plane came from that hit the south WTC tower as mentioned above.
The plane did exist but it came from an old military airport, where the signal changed coming from the plane, supposedly changed by the "hijackers". This would be a "theory" but based on the reality that there was no actual hijackers, as mentioned in an earlier post.
There was an actual plane that crashed into the WTC south tower, just not one accurately described by the mainstream media.
I don't know what you mean by repeatedly saying "random".
OK, you said you were sitting in your home, watching a "special feed" of some random camera that you say was set up in Battery Park.
Now you seem to be going back to another thread where I made a post prior to the most recent posts on this thread.
But then you say you used a high zoom device that you could see the plane was not United 175.
The other thread was on video games, so I did not want to go into detail and posted a link to this thread where I did go into detail, saying that I saw the plane throgh the lens of a camera with a zoom lens, which is, in case you don't know, a magnifying device.
I actually saw it very up close and through a magnifying device to where I could see that no one was in the cockpit to fly it, and no one was visible through the passenger windows, so it was instantly obvious to me that it was flown remote controlled.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
You are talking about flight 11.
That information was relayed from them to the ground, Betty Ong was telling AA what seat she was in and what seats the terrorists were in.
You are just throwing that out there without supporting it.
So to say that United 175 didn't exist is pure rubbish.
jmdewey60
reply to post by WarminIndy
I don't know what you mean by repeatedly saying "random".
OK, you said you were sitting in your home, watching a "special feed" of some random camera that you say was set up in Battery Park.
The only people who could have been the source of that feed was the military.
That is not "random", it's very specific and has to have been pre-planned.
That video is probably in the same place where the video is from the plane hitting the Pentagon and the yellow Ryder truck at Oklahoma City.
Not only do we know the seats they were in because they bought tickets that designated their seats, but they were also on the security cameras as they boarded the planes. That's how we know who they were. They checked-in, and it was then put on the planes' manifests. Flight attendants on United 175 checked the manifest as the men boarded, so don't even play that it was remote controlled.
This is completely irrelevant speculation since it obviously could never happen, no matter what.
What would be more interesting is if she saw him on September 12. If he were just a regular guy doing his regular thing, then he should have been doing his regular thing on September 12 as well.