Nine Documents From The Last 89 Years You Should Be Aware Of

page: 4
275
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 09:05 AM
link   
I might be called ignorant... but to me a one world government sounds pretty awesome. (No wars, no passports, food and quality of life for everyone) whats wrong with that??




posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 09:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by pikestaff
Knowing that stuff just makes it worse! ignorance really is bliss! Seems that the tentacles of Rome and London are everywhere, So I should not really worry about Jihad, the Jews, wall street, etc., but those mentioned in the thread.


Exactly, once you understand the smoke screens thrown up, you can see right through them and see who the real criminals are. You can then seperate yourself and help others to do the same and then move in the proper direction to help stop these physcopathic megalomaniacs from achieving world domination.

Very simple to see how easy it is fro these Elite to pull this off when the public is more concerned with reruns and ball sports and Nascar and the like. An eye on government activities is never a good thing for them.



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 09:18 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 09:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by halfmanhalfamazing
I might be called ignorant... but to me a one world government sounds pretty awesome. (No wars, no passports, food and quality of life for everyone) whats wrong with that??


Shall I be the first to say....."are you insane". And do you think you or ANY of your offspring will be allowed to live? And those who are "allowed" to live will be slaves.



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 09:19 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 09:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by halfmanhalfamazing
I might be called ignorant... but to me a one world government sounds pretty awesome. (No wars, no passports, food and quality of life for everyone) whats wrong with that??


The way and means which are used to achieve this, do you really think you can build a peacefull world government ontop of countless dead bodies?
I do not.

Sacrificing people for "the greater good" is in my humble opinion not the way humanity should choose.
There will be always people who would resist a world government which foundations are built on human sacrifices.



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 09:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by vexati0n
I know this is going to be an unpopular position, but what, exactly is wrong with a universal global government? It could be argued that the United States are a microcosm of just such a system: States have given a measure of sovereignty to the Federal Government, counties to States, cities to counties, and so on. The model is in full swing here and has been for 230 years. What is inherently wrong with expanding that model to a global scale?

I find most of the arguments against a unified world government to be a bit two-faced, at least the American arguments which are the ones I'm familiar with. On one hand, we deplore the idea of anybody telling Americans what to do, unless they are other Americans who have been rightfully elected. On the other hand, we don't seem to mind that we as Americans tell half of everyone else on the planet what they are supposed to do. It seems like most Americans would be okay with a global government, so long as it took the form of an American-ruled empire.

If the argument against global government were a morally honest one, then we would deplore equally the notion of a foreigner ruling over us and the notion of us ruling over foreigners.

But all in all, the OP was great, and really well researched. And anyone who doesn't see the steps being taken toward global government isn't paying much attention. I guess the difference between me and many on ATS is that I actually support a one-world government, because I find it deplorable that billions of people live and die in awful conditions so incompatible with Human dignity, and it's clear that there is no system of International law short of absolute federation that will ever address that problem adequately. The Westphalian System of national sovereignty, like the systems that preceded it, is only as good as the conditions it allows for. It is basically an international "honor system" that leaves billions of people out in the cold.

There is nothing inherently superior about any single nation or any single race of people. I am an American because I live in America; I am a Human because that's what I am. Global politics should reflect that.



Thanks for the response. I guess I'll post what I responded to on page one, re my position on it..
--------------------------------------------------------------

"Call me crazy, I just don't like the idea of a select few powerful elite controlling the direction things are headed in.. It's like population control. I have friends that say, "Yea, there should be something done about the expanding population".. But then you stop and think:

-who's in control of said population control?
-by what means will (or is) this being implemented?
-what percentage of this agenda will the public actually be privy to?



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 10:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by TheUniverse
reply to post by rstregooski
 


Well i read about half of it so far restregooski and i like what you have put together. This is some really damning evidence that shows the World Government has been in the making for a long time.

It seems like there is no democracy its been fascism all along.

Run by the major corporations and the 1450 CFR members who wish to profit of everything thing and the Non-winning war in Vietnam.

So i wonder were the world wars a non-winning war as well that sought to en-debt the nations to reap the profits from them for the eons, centuries.

The world has been duped.


... and soon bow down to your leaders



Since one of your links was Jordan Maxwell i thought this would be appropriate.
edit on 26-6-2011 by TheUniverse because: (no reason given)



Thanks for that, I've seen that video many times and it's dead on!...



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 10:00 AM
link   
By looking at our current administration and their actions, we can clearly see that the NWO is accomplishing what they set out to do.



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 10:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by tim3lord


thats one hell of a post.

its too bad the JBS failed in its attempts to stop the infiltration of America. I suspect they themselves were infiltrated and taken over.


"mother of God".... Perfect.. "You boys like Mexico, Wheeeewwwwww!"



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 10:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by rstregooski
 

Here are the two parts to the interview in its entirety. The up-loader of the videos has the right idea.


There was another thread in which they posted documents claiming to have been entered into the Congressional record. It would be that much more compelling if someone could obtain physical copies of these docs. Seems that it would have to be in person as the online catalog only goes as far back as 1994:

www.gpoaccess.gov...

What's difficult is to reconcile is the fact that so many ATS members seem to appreciate and understand the true agenda and who's behind it and yet they continue to buy into this fake war on terror...



Which documents in the congressional record are you referring to? I can find pretty much anything on microfilm at my local University library....



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 10:15 AM
link   
Fantastic post! The video with Larry McDonald was amazing.

Did everyone notice the difference between this interview (common for it's day) and the content, format and respect that is afforded during interviews today?

What a difference. The moderator was even taking notes, he quoted how many times one individual had used the term conspiracy, while very intelligently moderating a debate and asking intelligent questions with comprehension and insight.

And today's interviews are "What magazines do you read" and "Are you against terrorism?".



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 10:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by sdocpublishing
Fantastic post! The video with was amazing.

Did everyone notice the difference between this interview (common for it's day) and the content, format and respect that is afforded during interviews today?

What a difference. The moderator was even taking notes, he quoted how many times one individual had used the term conspiracy, while very intelligently moderating a debate and asking intelligent questions with comprehension and insight.

And today's interviews are "What magazines do you read" and "Are you against terrorism?".



Good point.. If you look at the shows these days with Bill Oreilly or Sean Hannity, it's nothing more than a slam factory..



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 10:40 AM
link   
I'd like to take a second and thank everyone for their participation in this thread, whether for or against the point. The google search results for this thread's title have grown from 9 results to 3030 results overnight!



Proof...
edit on 26-6-2011 by rstregooski because: link



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 11:02 AM
link   
reply to post by rstregooski
 

I just realized it was another one of your threads:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

The link to the Jordan Maxwell page is here: www.jordanmaxwell.com...

If you could somehow obtain copies of the original, I think that would make it extremely difficult for the nay sayers to debunk.



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 11:31 AM
link   
A great post, thank you. I joined ATS for this type of post.

We are sleepwalking into the into something, NWO call it what you will, which will take every liberty we have left, although from my own experience more are waking up.

Socialist, Capitalist government doesn't matter what they call themselves imho, they are all puppets to the grand masters, and most probably 'sold their souls' to get where they are.

A very informative man is Max Igan who advises to fight the NWO with peacefull global Non Compliance, he is definately worth a Google.



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 12:00 PM
link   


50% of the WORLD lives off of or under $2.00 a day and work for wages we would not think twice about turning down. Even our own industry knows this, and replaced like 60% of the manufacturing jobs with robots, or moved them overseas where they can get people to work for $0.03 a shoe they make.
reply to post by Jrocbaby
 


I guess you are trying to compare apples and oranges here. Compare us to countries like us, not to the third world. And blame the victim while you're at it. Americans' greed is what caused our jobs to be shipped overseas and roboticized out of existence? Really? Not corporate greed but workers' greed in NOT being willing to work for $2.00 a day?

Hogwash. And more to the point, the OP has done a great service compiling these documents all in one place where they tell a compelling story...not only is the average American too busy to have read these documents already, why should they have known they exist? I'm sick of ats elitists blaming average Americans for our common predicament. I would argue, we, as the conspiracy educated fringe, have failed our fellow countrymen rather than vice-versa. Blame the media for force-feeding them trivia, rather than the truth. Even blame sites such as this one for promulgating the notion that people who believe in conspiracies like this also believe in lizard people from the center of the earth. (No offense to the those folks, but c'mon, the average guy isn't apt to give that a fair listen)

I have been reading threads on ats for several years now, and I haven't seen a "one-world conspiracy" thread so well documented and presented. What that means is that to expect the average American to have read this information already is ludicrous. We don't get anywhere disparaging our fellow man as sheeple. How many people have you personally shared this information with? Ask yourself if YOU are doing everything YOU can before blaming the average American.
edit on 26-6-2011 by joechip because: spelling
edit on 26-6-2011 by joechip because: clarification



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 12:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Shura

The way and means which are used to achieve this, do you really think you can build a peacefull world government ontop of countless dead bodies?
I do not.

Sacrificing people for "the greater good" is in my humble opinion not the way humanity should choose.
There will be always people who would resist a world government which foundations are built on human sacrifices.


Thanks for the reply.

I think that whatever "they" have planned (OWG) is better than the system we have now. Our governments are not peaceful, they are built on top of "countless bodies" and counting...

Don't you think that resisting a one world government is pointless? It is inevitable.

My point is that a One World Government sounds great... I just hope those at the top have hearts and actually care about advancing mankind.

Would be interesting to weigh up the pros and cons though.





posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 12:27 PM
link   
Wonderful post. Will have to read it bit by bit and watch as my pc will let me. Thank you for sharing.

Ainge



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 12:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by rstregooski

Originally posted by vexati0n
I know this is going to be an unpopular position, but what, exactly is wrong with a universal global government? It could be argued that the United States are a microcosm of just such a system: States have given a measure of sovereignty to the Federal Government, counties to States, cities to counties, and so on. The model is in full swing here and has been for 230 years. What is inherently wrong with expanding that model to a global scale?

I find most of the arguments against a unified world government to be a bit two-faced, at least the American arguments which are the ones I'm familiar with. On one hand, we deplore the idea of anybody telling Americans what to do, unless they are other Americans who have been rightfully elected. On the other hand, we don't seem to mind that we as Americans tell half of everyone else on the planet what they are supposed to do. It seems like most Americans would be okay with a global government, so long as it took the form of an American-ruled empire.

If the argument against global government were a morally honest one, then we would deplore equally the notion of a foreigner ruling over us and the notion of us ruling over foreigners.

But all in all, the OP was great, and really well researched. And anyone who doesn't see the steps being taken toward global government isn't paying much attention. I guess the difference between me and many on ATS is that I actually support a one-world government, because I find it deplorable that billions of people live and die in awful conditions so incompatible with Human dignity, and it's clear that there is no system of International law short of absolute federation that will ever address that problem adequately. The Westphalian System of national sovereignty, like the systems that preceded it, is only as good as the conditions it allows for. It is basically an international "honor system" that leaves billions of people out in the cold.

There is nothing inherently superior about any single nation or any single race of people. I am an American because I live in America; I am a Human because that's what I am. Global politics should reflect that.



Thanks for the response. I guess I'll post what I responded to on page one, re my position on it..
--------------------------------------------------------------

"Call me crazy, I just don't like the idea of a select few powerful elite controlling the direction things are headed in.. It's like population control. I have friends that say, "Yea, there should be something done about the expanding population".. But then you stop and think:

-who's in control of said population control?
-by what means will (or is) this being implemented?
-what percentage of this agenda will the public actually be privy to?


The Status Quo is hardly a better option. The world is still controlled by elites, the people are still told nothing, and as for population control, it would seem that the Human drive to reproduce like rabbits is currently overpowering the best poverty, war, genocide, and disease we can throw at it. A one-world government would be hard-pressed to make life more miserable for most people on Earth than it already is.

Or is it just that under a balanced system, Americans would be at just as great a risk as Ethiopians?

Life on planet Earth, thanks to the system of international independence we have now, is terrible for billions of people. Just because the extravagant living standards in the West would have to be clipped a bit under a one-world system (and only a bit; for example, to end world hunger it would take about half of what America spends in Afghanistan in one year), is no justification for the continued subjugation, repression, murder and effective enslavement of half of our species.





top topics
 
275
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join