Wait, what? I thought when I went to Implosion World.com, a website devoted to controlled demolitions, that those videos would be of buildings falling due to fires! [/sacrasm]
You do realize that they used explosives?
99% is nothing and means nothing.
If your DNA was 99% right and 1% wrong you would be a retard so that 1% means everything.
Nice try!! but more biased rhetoric with NO facts!
What makes you say that? I wasn't posting, but I read the conversation.
You did not know what Darkwing and I were talking about
Well yeah, you said something that was wrong, so I wanted to clear that up. Correct me if I'm wrong, but we are interested in the facts here, right?
you decided to quote mine a single piece of random text and react to it. Very engaging.
Darkwing suggested that the jets eject the mass
The mass that is creating those jets can not both create those jets and be ejected at the same time.
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by ANOK
So you also can not explain what force ejected the mass so you decided to bring up some irrelevant points. Look, oh noos, the top four floors crushed the lower 9 ones: www.youtube.com...edit on 31-7-2011 by -PLB- because: (no reason given)
You claim that the majority of the mass would eject which would lead to arrest, but you completely fail to explain how.
Originally posted by Darkwing01
No I don't, why do I have to explain it?
That is what happens in collapses of this type in reality ALWAYS and EVERY TIME.
Reality is what reality is independent of my ability to make you comprehend the blindingly obvious.
You fail to appreciate that science doesn't have to ask WHY things happen, we don't know WHY gravity works, and we shouldn't care much from a scientific perspective. All that we know and all that we need to know is THAT it works consistently within a well-defined range of parameters.
If you don't get that you don't get science. Simple as that.
Here were your exact words:
Then you jump in and say I am wrong and also explosions can make those jets. You really nailed it.
So, since the debate is over whether or not it was a natural collapse or a controlled demolition, I think providing evidence that controlled demolitions can cause those jets that you claim can only occur during a mass of debris falling, which would be consistent with the official story, is completely reasonable.
You do realize that these jets can only happen when a great mass of debris is falling right?
No it does not, I showed you a Verinage demolition where it didn't happen.
I don't really expect you to understand what the word context means so its all fine with me.
Originally posted by Darkwing01
Verinage is a demolition, and yes, material is ejected sideways, but it is limited BY DESIGN. It is possible that a natural collapse can happen on the mechanism, but it is also possible for monkeys hitting typewriter keys at random to type out the collected works of Shakespeare.
It is NOT gravity that causes things to go sideways, at least not directly. The force responsible for causing the acceleration in this case is the electromagnetic force. Gravity is involved but not the ultimate cause, you are correct.
I apologize for my foolish oversight.
I get what context doesn't mean: It doesn't mean that you can claim that the dust is causing the dust jets in one context and then play dumb as to the mechanism of material being ejected during a gravitational collapse as if elastic collisions are a new and hitherto undescribed phenomenon or something in another context.
So you think they design those buildings so that they could use the Venirage collapse technique on them? Seriously? But at least you acknowledge that "That is what happens in collapses of this type in reality ALWAYS and EVERY TIME." is complete nonsense.
So how is the electromagnetic force going to push out the majority of the mass? It will be fun read what fantasy you are going to make up this time.
So where exactly do I say that material is not ejected? (hint: I don't, your mind in making up things).